Response of Integrated Weed Management and Planting Patterns on Seed Productivity of Pea


27 / 11

Authors

  • PARMINDER SINGH Department of Vegetable Crops, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004 Author
  • J.S. KANWAR Department of Vegetable Crops, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004 Author
  • KULBIR SINGH Department of Vegetable Crops, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004 Author

https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v35i2.165194

Keywords:

Weed control, herbicides, planting patterns, pea seed production

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted in split plot design with two planting methods i.e. Bed Planting (60 cm and two rows in each beds) and flat planting with 30 cms row to row spacing in main plot and six weed control treatments namely Pendimethalin 0.75 kg. a.i./ha, Pendimethalin 0.75 kg. a.i./ha+ hand weeding 30 days after sowing, Trifluralin 1.25 kg a.i./ha, Trifluralin 0.75 kg a.i./ha + hand weeding 30 days after sowing, hand weeding at 30 days interval and unweeded in sub plot in pea cv. Matar Ageta-6. The application of Pendimethalin 0.50 kg. a.i./ha + hand weeding and Trifluralin 0.75 kg a.i./ha + hand weeding were found suitable for the effective weed control and for increasing seed yield. Bed planting system is the best for getting maximum seed production (17.7 q/ha) due to its congenial environment for root development and ultimately helping better crop stand, hence resulting in more productivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. SANDHU, K.S., S. SINGH, J.S. KOLAR & A.P. SINGH (1978). Weed control studies in pea (Pisum saitvum L). J. Res Punjab agric. Univ., 15: 236-40.

2. SINGH, J.S., V.M. BHAN & R.S. BALYAN (1991). Crop weed competition studies in pea (Pisum sativum). Ind J. Weed Sci., 23(1&2): 67-68.

3. SHARMA, J. (1993). Evaluation of herbicides in pea (Pisum satvum) in Mid Hills of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Weed Sci., 25(3&4): 36-39.

4. ZHAO, Z.M. (1991). A study of mechanized cultural techniques for low wetland using platform field methods. Soybean Sci., 10:139-44.

5. BORREL, A., A. GARSIDE & S. FUKΑΙ (1997). Improving efficiency of water use for rice in semi and tropical environment. Filed Crop Res., 52: 241-48.

6. RANDHAWA, B.S. (1994), The influence of production variables on the growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). M.Sc. thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India

7. RANA, S.S. (2002). Integrated weed management in Pea (Pisum sativum L) under Sangla Valley conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Ind. J. Weed Sci., 34: 204-07.

8. KUMAR, R., S. SINGH & R.S. BALYAN (2005). Effect of various treatments on weeds in soybean (Glycine max L.). Annals of Biology, 21: 29-32.

9. KUMAR, S. & C.M. SINGH (1994). Integrated weed management in vegetable pea (Pisum sativum) under dry temperate conditions. Indian J. Weed Sci., 26(3&4): 40-44.

10. BUTTER, G.S. & C.S. AULAKH (2004). Trifluralin for weed control in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). J. Res. Punjab agric. Univ., 41:317-19.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-02-21

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

PARMINDER SINGH, J.S. KANWAR, & KULBIR SINGH. (2025). Response of Integrated Weed Management and Planting Patterns on Seed Productivity of Pea. Seed Research, 35(2), 164-167. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v35i2.165194