Effect of Different Methods of Biofertilizer Application in Tomato Seed Production


39 / 0

Authors

  • SATESH KUMAR Department of Vegetable Crops, Dr.Y.S.Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Solan-173 230 Author
  • S.K. SHARMA Department of Vegetable Crops, Dr.Y.S.Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Solan-173 230 Author

https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v34i1.166359

Keywords:

Biofertilizers, Azotobacter, Azospirillium, Pseudomonas, Vesicular arbuscular mycorrihiza, tomato seed yield.

Abstract

An investigation using four biofertilizers namely Azotobacter, Azospirillium, Pseudomonas and Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM) was undertaken during summer season of 2002 and repeated in 2003, to study their role on various aspects of tomato seed production. Application of these biofertilizers was done with three methods ie nursery soil treatment, seedling treatment and field soil treatment, tried individually and in combinations thereof. Basal application of FYM (25t/ha) was given to all the plots except control where only recommended dose of NPK (100,75 and 55 kg/ha) was applied. The study revealed that Azotobacter when applied to nursery, seedling and field soil, resulted in maximum values with respect to number of fruits per plant(19.23), fruit yield per plant(1109g), per hectare (356.9q) 1000 seed weight (3.63g), seed yield per plant (4.58g), per hectare (152.70kg) along with C:B ratio (1:1.45). However, the results with respect to germination percentage of seeds remained non-significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. SHARMA,S.K. & K.S.THAKUR; (2002). Effect of biofertilizers and nitrogen nutrition on the yield and quality of tomato seed. Seed Res.30 (2):243-246.

2. SENGUPTA, S.K. Y.C.DWIVEDI&S.S.KUSHWAH, (2002). Response of tomato (Lycopercicon esculentum Mill.) to bioinoculants at different levels of nitrogen. Veg.Sci.29:186-188,

3. MARTINEZ, R., B.DIBUT, & R.GONZALEZ (1993). Stimulation of tomato development and yield by inoculation of red ferrallitic soils with Azotobacter chroococcum. Memorias 11th Congresco-latino-Americano-de-la-Ciencia-del- Suelo.2nd Congres Cubano-de-la-Ciencia-del- Suelo. Volume 5, Conferencias- Y- Simposios-11-17. Marzo-1990.La-Habana, Cuba.

4. AZCON,R. & J.M.BAREA (1975). Synthesis of auxins, gibberellins and cytokinins by Azotobacter vinelandii and Azotobacter beijerinckii related to effects produced on tomato plants. Plant and Soil 43(3):609-619.

5. Mohandas, S.(1987). Final response of tomato(Lycopercicon esculentum Mill. cv. Pusa Ruby) to inoculation with a VA mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) and with Azotobacter vinelandii. Plant and Soil. 98(2):295-297.

6. MAHMOUD, H.A.F. & M.A.T.AMARA (2000). Response of tomato to biological and mineral fertilizers under calcareous soil conditions. Bull. Fac. Agric., University of Cairo.51(2):151-174.

7. VERMA, T. S., P.C. THAKUR & AJEET SINGH (1997). Effect of biofertilizers on vegetable and seed yield of cabbage. Veg. Sci. 24 (1): 1-3.

8. TILAK,K.V.B.R. & GEETA SINGH. (1994). Biofertilizers: research gaps and future needs.Fert. News. 39(4):11-17.

9. VASISHT,K.D, B.N.SHARMA, & V.P.S. CHAHAL (1979).Influence of Azotobacter on the germination of okra seeds. Punjab. Agric. Univ.J.Res. 16:487-489.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-03-25

Published

2025-03-27

How to Cite

SATESH KUMAR, & S.K. SHARMA. (2025). Effect of Different Methods of Biofertilizer Application in Tomato Seed Production. Seed Research, 34(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v34i1.166359