Disease Incidence and Severity of Paddy Bunt in Punjab during 1996-2004


26 / 0

Authors

  • R.C. SHARMA Seed Technology Centre, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141004 Author
  • GURMIT SINGH Seed Technology Centre, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141004 Author
  • NAVRAJ K. SARAO Seed Technology Centre, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141004 Author
  • MONIKA A. JOSHI Seed Technology Centre, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141004 Author

https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v34i1.166428

Keywords:

Grain markets, kernel smut, Neovossia horrida, paddy bunt, Tilletia barclayana

Abstract

Under the disease monitoring programme in Punjab, 218, 1049, 1759, 1155, 889, 1286, 1252, 1052 and 936 samples of paddy (Oryza sativa L.) were collected, respectively, for the years 1996-2004 for analysis of paddy bunt (kernel smut) caused by Tilletia barclayana (Neovossia horrida). The disease incidence (per cent infection) and disease severity (coefficient of infection) were worked out for the last nine years. The average disease severity was lowest (0.33) in 2004 and highest (0.47) in 2001 and 2003 as compared to the previous years when the severity remained almost constant at (~0.41). Three clear-cut zones of the disease have emerged in Punjab, The South-western districts of the state like Bhatinda, Faridkot, Ferozepur, Moga and Sangrur have been identified as areas of high disease severity/infection per cent (0.63/9 1.0), respectively, while Central and North-western districts like Kapurthala, Patiala, Ludhiana, Amritsar and Jallandhar had moderate disease severity/infection per cent (0.36/87.0), North-eastern parts of the state viz. Hoshiarpur, Fatehgarh Sahib, Gurdaspur, Nawanshehar and Ropar represented the areas of low (0.26/78.8) disease severity/infection per cent. Among the prevalent varieties in Punjab, PR 108 was observed to be most susceptible to bunt as it had maximum severity (2.32) as well as per cent infection (93.59) followed by PR 113 (0.57/89.92) and PR 111 (0.50/87.20).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. TAKAHASHI, Y. (1996), Ustilago virens cke. and a new species of Tilletia parasitic on rice plant. Tokyo. Bot. Mgt. 10: 16-20.

2. PADWICK, G.W. & A. KHAN (1944). Notes on Indian fungi 2. Mycol Pap. Imp. Myco. Inst. 10: 17.

3. SINGH R.S. (1987). Plant Diseases. Oxford and IBH publishing co., New Delhi.

4. CHOWDHARY, S. (1946), Mode of transmission of the bunt of rice. Curr. Sci. 15: 11.

5. ΝΕΜΑ, K.G. (1983). Seed borne disease and seed certification. Paper presented at the second workshop on All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Seed borne Diseases held at Gujarat Agricultural University Anand, India from September 20-22.

6. SINGH, D.K. & R.C.RAI (1994). A view on seed certification standards for rice bunt. Seed Res. 22: 50-53.

7. KUMAR, I., M.S. KANG & S.S. SAINI (1978). Fertilizers levels and incidence of bunt disease of rice in India. International Rice Research News 3: 5.

8. SHARMA, R.C. & S.S.GILL (1997). Status of kernel smut of paddy in Punjab and its control. Seed Res. 25: 68-73.

9. AGGARWAL, V. K. & A. K. SRIVASTAVA (1981). A simple technique for routine examination of rice seed lot for rice bunt. Seed Tech. News 11: 11-20.

10. CHAHAL, S.S., B.S. SIDHU & K.S. AULAKH (1990). Rating scale for assessment of kernel smut of rice. Plant Disease Research 5: 194-97.

11. AUJLA, S.S., INDU SHARMA & B.B. SINGH (1989). Rating scale for identifying wheat varieties resistant to Neovossia indica. Indian Phytopath 42: 161-62.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-03-26

Published

2025-03-27

How to Cite

R.C. SHARMA, GURMIT SINGH, NAVRAJ K. SARAO, & MONIKA A. JOSHI. (2025). Disease Incidence and Severity of Paddy Bunt in Punjab during 1996-2004. Seed Research, 34(1), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v34i1.166428