Reassessing the Validity Period of Certified Seeds in Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)
185 / 218
Keywords:
Proso millet, seed certification standards, cloth and HDPE bags, storageAbstract
Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) is gaining renewed importance as a climate-resilient and
nutritionally rich cereal capable of supporting food and nutritional security under marginal and rainfed conditions.
With increasing emphasis on millet-based cropping systems, ensuring the availability of high-quality seed throughout
the planting season has become critical, necessitating a re-examination of existing seed certification validity
norms. The present study evaluated the storability and revalidation requirements of certified Proso millet seed
varieties GPUP-25 and GPUP-28 stored under ambient conditions in cloth and high-density polyethylene (HDPE)
bags for nine months. The investigation was conducted during 2024–2025 at the Notified State Seed Testing
Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, SHUATS, Prayagraj. Progressive declines in germination
percentage, seedling dry weight and vigour indices were observed with increasing storage duration, irrespective
of packaging material. However, seeds stored in HDPE bags consistently maintained superior physiological quality
compared to those stored in cloth bags. By the ninth month of storage, germination in cloth bags declined below
the Indian Minimum Seed Certification Standards (IMSCS) minimum of 75% (72.63%), whereas HDPE-stored
seeds retained acceptable germination (83.05%). Higher moisture content and electrical conductivity values in
cloth bags indicated accelerated seed deterioration. The findings demonstrate that packaging material significantly
influences seed longevity and suggest that uniform certification validity periods may not adequately reflect cropand storage-specific seed behaviour. HDPE bags are recommended for medium- to long-term storage of Proso
millet seeds under ambient conditions, while seeds stored in cloth bags require revalidation beyond eight months.
The study provides empirical evidence to support the need for revisiting and refining seed certification and
revalidation standards for Proso millet based on storability performance.
Downloads
References
1. FAO (2023). https,//www.fao.org/millets-2023.
2. RAGHUPATI KP, K SUJATHA, V PARAMASIVAM AND AS
AHMAED (2017). Seed development and maturation studies
in Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). American
(Abelmoschus moschatus), 1-3.
3. SAMINENI S, S GUMMADI, S THUSHAR, DN KHAN, A
GKANOGIANNIS, LA BECERRA LOPEZ-LAVALLE AND RK
SINGH (2025). Exploring Proso Millet Resilience to Abiotic
Stresses: High Yield Potential in Desert Environments of the
Middle East. Agronomy, 15(1): 165.
4. VETRIVENTHAN M, VCR AZEVEDO, HD UPADHYAY AND
D NARESH (2019). Variability in the global proso millet
(Panicum miliaceum L.) germplasm collection conserved at
the ICRISAT genebank. Agriculture, 9(5): 112.
5. GOMASHE SS (2017). Proso millet, Panicum miliaceum (L.):
Genetic improvement and research needs. In Millets and
Sorghum: Biology and Genetic Improvement; Patil, J.V., Ed.;
John Wiley and Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, pp. 150-179.
6. TONAPI VA, BV BHAT, N KANNABABU, M ELANGOVAN,
AV UMAKANTH, R KULKARNI AND TGN RAO (2015). Millet
seed technology, seed production, quality control and legal
compliance. Hyderabad, India, Indian Institute of Millets
Research. Pp. 120-130.
7. GUPTA N, C MANIMURGAN, PM SINGH AND R KUMAR
(2019). Standardization of seed germination testing protocol
in Moringa oleifera Lam. Vegetable Science, 46(1-2): 148-151.
8. SEED ACT (1966). Retrieved from https://seednet.gov.in/
PDFFILES/Seed_Act_1966.pdf
9. INDIAN MINIMUM SEED CERTIFICATIONS STANDARDS
(2013). The Central Seed Certification Board, Department of
Agriculture and Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture and
Farmers Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi.
10. INTERNATIONAL SEED TESTING ASSOCIATION (2022).
International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and
Technology, 27: 25-30.
11. ABDUL BAKI AA AND JE BAKER (1973). Changes in cellular
organelles for membranes related to vigour loss in seed. Seed
Science and Technology, (1): 89-125.
12. MANJUNATHA UB, BASAVEGOWDA, SR DODDAGOUDAR,
IM SANGEETA AND N SUSHILA (2024). Effect of packaging
materials on pigeon pea Seeds stored under ambient
conditions. Seed Research, 47(1): 59-64.
13. SINHA JP, HCS NEGI, SK JHA, SK JAIN AND MANOJ
VISHWAKARMA (2025). Effect of Packaging Materials on
Paddy (Oryza sativa) Seed Quality. Seed Research, 38(1):
31-35.
14. ELLIS RH AND TD HONG (2007). Seed longevity-moisture
content relationships in hermetic and open storage. Seed
Science Research, 7(1): 63-73.
15. FAO (2018). Seed storage of agricultural crops. Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
16. MCDONALD MB AND LO COPEL (1997). Seed Production:
Principles and Practices. Chapman and Hall.
17. RAO NK, S BHASKER AND K SUSHMA (2020). Seed storage
behavior: A review. Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science
and Technology, 7(1): 1-14.
18. XIAO Y, S LV AND X ZHANG (2020). Advances in polymerbased materials for seed coating and pelleting. Frontiers in
Materials, 7: 1-11.
19. WALTERS C, LJ WHEELER AND JM GROTENHUIS (2020).
The biology of aging seed. New Phytologist, 226(4): 1230-
1236.
20. SMITH D, M JOHNSON, K BROWN, S WILSON, R
ANDERSON AND P THOMPSON (2023). Effectiveness of
packaging materials in preserving seed quality during storage:
a review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 10(2): 123-135.
21. ELLIS RH, M NASEHZADEH AND J HANSON (2019). Seed
longevity-what do we know and what should we do? Seed
Science Research, 29(3): 245-252.
22. KUMAR V, S CHAUHAN AND R GUPTA (2021). Seed storage:
Understanding the role of temperature and moisture content.
Journal of Stored Products Research, 92: 101778.