Studies on Stigma Receptivity and Pollen Viability in Parental Lines of Phule Aadishakti Hybrid of pearlmillet as Affected by Different Seasons
132 / 59
Keywords:
Pearl millet, stigma receptivity, pollen viability, seasonsAbstract
Stigma receptivity and pollen viability are critical determinants of successful hybrid seed production
in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.), particularly in male-sterility–based hybrid breeding systems. The
present investigation was undertaken to study the effect of seasons on stigma receptivity and pollen viability in
parental lines of the Phule Aadishakti pearl millet hybrid during Kharif and summer seasons. The experimental
material comprised the male-sterile line DHLB-8A (female parent), the maintainer line DHLB-8B, and the restorer
line DHLB-967 (male parent). Stigma receptivity was evaluated under six starvation interval treatments (0, 1, 2, 3,
4, and 5 days), while pollen viability was assessed at six pollination intervals (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours). Seed set
percentage, number of seeds per earhead, seed weight per earhead, and 1000-seed weight were recorded to
assess reproductive success. Results revealed that both stigma receptivity and pollen viability were significantly
influenced by season, with superior performance observed during the Kharif season compared to the summer
season. Higher seed set and yield attributes in Kharif indicated more favorable environmental conditions for
reproductive processes. The findings highlight the importance of optimizing season-specific flowering
synchronization and pollination timing for efficient hybrid seed production. This study provides valuable insights
for improving seed yield and quality in pearl millet hybrid breeding and commercial seed production programs.
Downloads
References
1. MENON PM (1959). Occurrence of cytoplasmic male sterility
in pearl millet. Curr. Sci., 28(4): 165-167.
2. BURTON GW (1958). Cytoplasmic male sterility in pearl millet.
Agron. J., 50(4): 230.
3. GODBOLE SV (1927). Studies on bajara: Morphology of
Pennisetum typhoideum. Ministry Dep. Agric. India, Botanical
Series, 14: 247-268.
4. AYYANGAR GRC, C VIJIARAGAVAN AND VG PATIL (1933).
Studies on Pennisetum typhoideum (Rich) the pearl millet.
Part I. Anthesis. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 3: 688-694.
5. KULKARNI GN AND MK RAJARAO (1987). Flowering stability
and stigma receptivity in MS 5141A line of bajra under
Bangalore conditions. Seed Res., 15(2): 119-121.
6. SURYAVANSHI YB (1989). Stability of the natural seed setting
of newly developed male sterile lines of pearl millet
(Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis,
M.P.K.V., Rahuri.
7. ANONYMOUS (2000a). Annual Report of Research Work
submitted by Seed Technology Research Unit (N.S.P.),
Hyderabad, Parbhani, Rahuri and Akola. pp. 95-96.
8. SHARMA SP, DC DUBE AND AN AHUJA (1981). Study of
blooming process and stigma receptivity in male sterile lines
and its maintainer in pearl millet. Seed Res., 9(2): 148-153.
9. KHAIRWAL IS AND S SINGH (1987). A study on pollen–stigma
compatibility, flowering and pollination in pearl millet. Seed
and Farms, 13: 14-16.
10. ANURADHA G, F JABEEN AND BM REDDY (1994). Stigma
receptivity and pollen viability in parental lines of two pearl
millet hybrids. Seed Tech. News., 24: 33.
11. SHELAR VR AND RB PATIL (1993). Synchronization studies
in sorghum. Seed Res., 21(2): 86-88.
12. PATIL PA (1985). Stigma receptivity and pollen viability in
different parental lines of sorghum hybrids. M.Sc. (Agri.)
Thesis, M.P.K.V., Rahuri, Maharashtra.
13. POKHRIYAL S AND KS MANGTH (1979). Effect of pollen
storage on seed set in pearl millet. Seed Res., 7(2): 131-135.
14. KUMAR A AND BM CHAUHAN (1993). Effects of phytic acid
on protein digestibility (in vitro) and HCl extractability of
minerals in pearl millet sprouts. Cereal Chem., 70(5): 504-
506.