Agro-morphological and Seed Trait Characterization of DUS-Tested Wheat Varieties for Central India


167 / 222

Authors

  • DK VERMA ICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Regional Station, Daly College Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh-452001, India Author
  • RAVINDRA PANWAR ICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Regional Station, Daly College Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh-452001, India Author

https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v53i2.15

Keywords:

DUS testing, Seed traits, Wheat genotypes, Morphological characterization, Grain weight

Abstract

Agro-morphological and seed trait characterization of wheat genotypes is a prerequisite for varietal
identification, DUS testing, and maintenance of genetic purity in seed production systems. The present investigation
was carried out at ICAR–IARI Regional Station, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, during the rabi seasons of 2022–23
and 2023–24 to characterize eight promising wheat genotypes along with two check varieties (DBW-187 and HD2967). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Significant
variation was observed among genotypes for major quantitative traits, including plant height, days to heading,
peduncle length, ear length, awn length, and thousand grain weight, while most qualitative seed and plant descriptors
remained stable across years. Absence of coleoptile anthocyanin coloration, uniform amber grain colour, and
consistent awn presence contributed to varietal distinctness and seed identity. Early heading and maturity were
recorded in genotypes 22BRHI3304 and 22BRHI3305, whereas 2889/2139 and 22BRDP5001 were late maturing.
The stability of qualitative traits coupled with significant differences in yield-related seed traits highlights the suitability
of these genotypes for DUS testing and seed certification. The study underscores the importance of integrating
agro-morphological and seed characters for varietal registration, seed purity maintenance, and wheat improvement
under Central Indian conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. AGRAWAL PK (1995). Cultivar purity test in Techniques in

Seed Science and Technology (eds) A BOERNER, E

SCHUMANN, A FUESTE, H COESTER, B LEITHOLD, MS

ROEDER AND WE WEBER (2002). Mapping of quantitative

traits loci determining agronomic important characters in

hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) Theoretical and Applied

Genetics, 105: 921-936.

2. ARIYO OJ (1993). Genetic diversity in West African okra

(Abelmoschus caillei) – Multivariate analysis of morphological

and agronomic characteristics. Genetic Resources and Crop

Evolution, 40(1): 25-32.

3. HALJAK M, R KOPPEL, A INGVER AND V RUZGAS (2008).

Variation in morphological characteristics of winter wheat

(Triticum aestivum L.) Latvian Journal of Agronomy, 11: 54-

60.

4. PAUKENS J (1975). Methods of determining cultivar trueness

and purity in maize (Zea mays L.). Grain Sci. Technol., 3: 176-

181.

5. GAUTAM RK, DK. JAIN AND AN SHRIVASTAVA (2015).

Genetic diversity analysis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using

principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis. The

Bioscan, 10(1): 171-176.

6. PELTONEN-SAMIO P, A KANGAS SL JAUHIAINEN (2007).

Grain dominated grain weight in temperate cereal yield

determination: Evidence based on 30 years of multi-location

trials. Field Crops Research, 100: 179-188.

7. CHANDRA S AND NS BAINS (2000). Genotype × environment

interactions and stability analysis for grain yield in bread wheat

(Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant

Breeding, 60(1): 77-81.

8. SMITH, JSC AND OS SMITH (1989). The description and

assessment of distance between lines of maize. II. The utility

of morphological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and a

scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines.

Maydica, 34: 151-161

9. LUITEL BP, KH GHIMIRE, BK JOSHI, KY RYU, SJ SOOK, J

RHEE, SG KIM, HC KO, HJ BAEK, MS YOON AND OS HUR

(2016). Current Status of Plant Genetic Resources, Their

Research and Management in the Gene bank of Nepal, J.

Korean Soc. Int. Agric., 28(2): 143-151, 2016.

10. BURTON GW (1952). Quantitative Inheritance in Grasses.

Proceedings of the 6th International Grassland Congress, 1:

277-283.

11. GOMEZ-BECERRA HF (2010). Grain zinc and iron

concentrations in a worldwide collection of durum wheat.

Journal of Cereal Science, 52(3): 342-349.

12. REYNOLDS M (2009). Raising yield potential in wheat. Journal

of Experimental Botany, 60(7): 1899-1918.

13. SHARMA V (2021). Genetic analysis and selection parameters

for yield and its components in wheat. Indian Journal of

Genetics, 81(2): 259-265.

14. SINGH RK AND BD CHAUDHARY (2016). Biometrical

Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers,

Ludhiana.

15. UPOV (2011). Guidelines for the conduct of tests for

distinctness, uniformity and stability in wheat. International

Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, TG/3/12

16. BORNER A, E SCHUMANN, A FÜRSTE, H CÖSTER, B

LEITHOLD, MS RÖDER AND WE WEBER (2002). Mapping

of quantitative trait loci determining agronomic important

characters in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Downloads

Submitted

2025-12-31

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

DK VERMA, & RAVINDRA PANWAR. (2025). Agro-morphological and Seed Trait Characterization of DUS-Tested Wheat Varieties for Central India. Seed Research, 53(2), 196-201. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v53i2.15