Standardization of Electric and Magnetic Field Intensities on Germination Behavior, Seedling Performance, and Physiological Attributes of Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
18 / 13
Keywords:
Proso millet, Panicum miliaceum, Magnetic field, Electric field, Seed germination, Seedling vigour, Nutritional compositionAbstract
Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) is a nutritionally rich, climate-resilient cereal cultivated in semiarid regions, yet its seedling establishment is often constrained by poor germination and weak early growth. This study evaluated the effects of magnetic and electric field treatments on seed germination, early seedling growth, and nutritional attributes of proso millet under controlled laboratory conditions during the 2024–2025. Eleven treatments, including a non-treated control, six magnetic field intensities (25–150 mT), and four electric field intensities (50–125 mA), were imposed in a Completely Randomized Design with four replications. Seeds were exposed to magnetic fields using cylindrical coil generators and to electric fields via electrolyte-based electrodesystems, followed by germination assessment using the Top of Paper method. Data were recorded for germination
percentage, germination energy, shoot and root length, seedling length, fresh and dry weight, and seedling vigour indices I and II. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects of treatments on all parameters. Magnetic field treatment at 125 mT produced the highest germination (95.58%), germination energy (35.55), shoot (9.23 cm) and root length (10.43 cm), seedling length (19.65 cm), fresh (9.65 g) and dry weight (2.58 g), and vigour indices (1877.94 and 246.07). Electric field treatments enhanced these traits moderately, with maximum improvement observed at 125 mA. Nutritional analysis of seeds exposed to 125 mT showed elevated protein (95.58 g/100 g), fat (35.55 g/100 g), fiber (9.23 g/100 g), and mineral content. These findings indicate that electromagnetic stimulation, particularly magnetic field exposure, significantly enhances germination, seedling vigour, and nutritional quality, providing a sustainable, non-chemical approach to improving proso millet establishment and seed quality.
Downloads
References
1. CALAMAI A, A MASONI, L MARINI, M DELL’ACQUA, P GANUGI, S BOUKAIL, S BENEDETTELLI AND E PALCHETTI (2020). Evaluation of the
agronomic traits of 80 accessions of Panicum miliaceum L. under Mediterranean pedoclimatic conditions. Agriculture, 10(12): 578.
2. ZHANG P, B WANG, Y GUO, T WANG, Q WEI, Y LUO, H LI, H WU, X WANG AND X ZHANG (2024). Identification of droughtresistant
response in Panicum miliaceum L. roots through physiological and transcriptomic analysis. Plants, 13(12): 1693.
3. NEMATPOUR A, HR ESHGHIZADEH AND M ZAHEDI (2019). Drought tolerance mechanisms in foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and proso
millet (Panicum miliaceum) under different nitrogen supply and sowing dates. Crop and Pasture Science, 70(5): 442–452.
4. HARIPRIYA A, PK RAI AND PA JAIN (2022). Pre-sowing seed treatments of magnetic field, electric field and chemicals on seedling
characters of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) variety Super Green. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 28(May Suppl. Issue): S115–
S119.
5. SARRAF M, S KATARIA, LO SANTOS, RD MENEGATTI AND S LIU (2020). Magnetic field (MF) applications in plants: An overview. Plants,
9(9): 1139.
6. PATHAK S, PK RAI AND SK RAI (2024). Effect of different doses of gamma rays on Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) genotypes. J.
Oilseeds Res., 41(3 & 4): 136–140.
7. HAQ Z, Y JAMIL AND J NISAR (2016). Pre-sowing seed magnetic field treatment influence on germination, seedling growth and
enzymatic activities of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 6: 133–138.
8. PODLEŒNA A, D KULUS AND J KOŒCIELNIAK (2019). Effect of pre-sowing magnetic field treatment on some biochemical and
physiological processes in faba bean (Viciafaba L. ssp. minor). J. Plant Growth Regul., 38: 1153–1160.
9. RADHAKRISHNAN R (2019). Magnetic field regulates plant functions, growth and enhances tolerance against environmental stresses.
Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants, 25(5): 1107–1119.10. ABDUL-BAKI AA AND JD ANDERSON (1973). Vigor determination in soybean seed by
multiple criteria. Crop Sci., 13(6): 630–633.
11. AOAC INTERNATIONAL (2005–2012). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th–20th ed. AOAC International,
Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
12. NWEZE BC, EN EZEH AND C ODOLI (2022). Proximate and mineral composition of selected cereals and legumes. Afr. J. Food Agric.
Nutr. Dev., 23(7): Article 22950.
13. SIKDER MM AND MM HOSSAIN (2014). Proximate, mineral and antinutrient composition of underutilized pulses: Effect of roasting
and boiling on nutrients. J. Food Sci. Technol., 51(9): 1901–1906.
14. BELOSHAPKA AN, PR BUFF, GC FAHEY AND KS SWANSON (2016). Compositional analysis of whole grains, processed grains and other
carbohydrate sources with applicability to pet food and human nutrition. Foods, 5(2): 23.
15. VASHISTH A AND DK JOSHI (2017). Growth characteristics of maize seeds exposed to magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics, 38: 151–157.
16. ANAND A, A KUMARI, M THAKUR AND A KOUL (2019). Hydrogen peroxide signaling integrates with phytohormones during the
germination of magnetoprimed tomato seeds. Sci. Rep., 9: Article 8814.
17. SARI ME, I DEMIR, KC YILDIRIM AND N MEMIS (2023). Magnetopriming enhances germination and seedling growth parameters of
onion and lettuce. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Food Sci., 7(3): 468–475.