Growth Performance of Different Tree Species in Agroforestry Systems in IGNP Command Area in Western Rajasthan

Bilas Singh; Dhana Ram; Om Prakash; Deepak Kumar; Bhawana Sharma; Mana Ram Baloch

doi:10.56093/aaz.v63i4.152799

Authors

Bilas Singh ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India
Dhana Ram ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India
Om Prakash ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India
Deepak Kumar ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India
Bhawana Sharma ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India
M R Baloch ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v63i4.152799

Keywords:

Arid region, agroforestry, growth, survival, tree-crop interaction

Abstract

Tree integration in agriculture lands is climate resilient land use system traditionally practiced for improved productivity in arid regions. It enhances land productivity and improves livelihoods of rural dwellers. Four agroforestry models that includes block plantations of Prosopis cineraria (Khejri), Tecomella undulata (Rohida), grafted Zizyphus mauritiana (Ber) and Cordia myxa (Gunda) and boundary plantations of Dalbergia sissoo (Shisham), Carissa carandas (Karonda) and Cordia myxa were assessed at two sites within 500 m distance involving two farmers. Seedlings were planted in September 2021. Different crops were cultivated during kharif and rabi seasons of 2021 and 2022. Plants were measured for height and collar diameter and crop yields recorded. After two years of establishment, P. cineraria and T. undulata seedlings exhibited 99.0% survival, whereas seedlings of Z. mauritiana and C. myxa showed survival of 93.0% and 95.0%, respectively. Survival was relatively greater under block plantation as compared to the boundary plantations. Height and collar diameter growth of T. undulata was greater (p<0.05) by 87.0% and 37.0% than P. cineraria seedlings in agri-silvi model. Z. mauritiana exhibited 30.0% greater height, whereas C. myxa showed 22.7% greater collar diameter in agri-horti system. In boundary plantation, survival and growth was greater (p<0.05) in D. sissoo than C. carandas and C. myxa seedlings. Yield of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba was lesser than Plantago ovata and it was higher in 2022-23 than in 2021-22. However, dry matter and grain yields of both C. tetragonoloba and P. ovata were almost similar (p>0.05) in control as well as tree integrated plots. This indicated least competitive effect of trees on crops during initial 2 years. Conclusively, T. undulata and Z. mauritiana in agroforestry and D. sissoo in boundary plantation appeared suitable in initial years. However, recording of data for long term is suggested for effectual conclusion and recommendation based on tree crop interaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dhana Ram, ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India

Extension Division

Assistant Chief Technical Officer
Om Prakash , ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India

Extension Division

Technical Assistant
Deepak Kumar, ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India

Silviculture and Forest Management Division

Scientist-B
Bhawana Sharma, ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India

Forest Ecology and Climate Change Division

Scientist-E
M R Baloch, ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India

AFRI

Director

References

Armbrust, D.V. and Retta A. 2000. Wind and Sandblast damage to growing vegetation. Annals of Arid Zone 39(3): 273-284.

Bhadouria, R., Singh R., Srivastava P. and Raghubanshi A.S. 2016. Understanding the ecology of tree seedling growth in dry tropical environment. Energy Ecology Environ DOI 10.1007/s40974-016-0038-3

Cadotte, M.W., Carscadden, K. and Mirotchnick, N. 2011. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 1079-1087. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x.

Gupta, G.N., PremLal, Mishra, A.K. and Kacchawaha, G.R. 1995. Irrigation water management in Dalbergia sissoo during its establishment in the Indian desert. Indian Forester 2: 143-152.

Harsh, L.N., Tewari, J.C., Burman, U. and Sharma, S.K. 1992. Agroforestry in arid regions. Indian Farming 42: 32-37.

Islam, S., Reza, M.N., Ahmed, S., Samsuzzaman, Cho Y.J. and Chung, S. 2024. Seedling growth stress quantification based on environmental factors using sensor fusion and image processing. Horticulturae 10(2): 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/ horticulturae10020186

IWMI (International Water Management Institute) 2007. Groundwater Externalities of Large Surface Irrigation Transfers: Lessons from Indira Gandhi Nahar Pariyojana, Rajasthan, India. pp 107-121. https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H042689. pdf.

Jodha, N.S. 1997. Trends in tree management in arid land use in Western Rajasthan. In: Farms, Trees and Farmers: Response to Agricultural Intensification (Eds. J.E.M. Arnold and P.A. Dewees), pp. 43- 64. Earthscan Publications Ltd. London

Kaushik, N., Kumari, S., Singh, S. and Kaushik, J.C. 2014. Productivity and economics of different agri-silvi-horti systems under drip irrigation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 84 (10): 1166-1171.

Kaushik, N., Tikkoo, A., Yadav, P.K., Deswal, R.P.S. and Singh, S. 2017.Agri–Silvi–Horti systems for semiarid regions of North-West India. Agricultural Research 6(2): 150-158.

Livesley, S., Gregory, P. and Buresh, R. 2000. Competition in tree row agro-forestry systems. 1. Distribution and dynamics of fine root length and biomass. Plant and Soil 227: 149-161. https:// doi.org/10.1023/A:1026551616754

Luedeling, E., Smethurst, P.J., Baudron, F., Bayala, J., Huth, N.I., van Noordwijk, M., Ong, C.K., Mulia, R., Lusiana, B., Muthuri, C., Sinclair, F. 2016. Field-scale modeling of tree–crop interactions: Challenges and development needs. Agricultural System 142: 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. agsy.2015.11.005

Masek, J., Tumajer J., Rydval M., Lange J. and Treml V. 2021. Age and size outperform topographic effects on growth-climate responses of trees in two Central European coniferous forest types. Dendrochronologia 68: 125845.

Mertia, R.S., Prasad, R., Gajja, B.L., Samra, J.S. and Narain, P. 2006. Impact of Shelterbelts in arid Region of Western Rajasthan. Central Arid Zone research Institute, Regional Research Station, Jaisalmer. pp 13-15.

Odhiambo, H.O., Ong C., Wilson J., Deans J.D., Broadhead J. and Black C. 1999. Tee-crop interaction for below-ground resources in drylands: Root structure and function. Annals of Arid Zone 38(3): 221-238.

Ong, C.K., Corlett J.E., Singh R.P. and Black C.R. 1991. Above and below ground interactions in agroforestry systems. Forest Ecology Management 45(1-4): 45-57.

Primicia, I., Camarero J.J., Janda P., Cada V., Morrissey R.C., Trotsiuk V., Bače R., Teodosiu M. and Svoboda M. 2015. Age, competition, disturbance and elevation effects on tree and stand growth response of primary Picea abies forest to climate. Forest Ecology Management 354: 77-86.

Rizvi, R.H., Ram N., Chaturvedi O.P., Prasad R., Handa A.K. and Badre A. 2019. Carbon sequestration and CO2 absorption by agroforestry systems: An assessment for Central Plateau and Hill region of India. Journal of Earth System Science, doi: 10.1007/s12040-019-1071-3.

Sileshi, G.W., Mafongoya P.L. and Nath A.J. 2020. Agroforestry systems for improving nutrient tecycling and soil fertility on degraded lands. In: Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes (Eds. J.C. Dagar, S.R. Gupta, and D. Teketay), pp. 225-253. Springer, Singapore. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-981-15-4136-0_8.

Singh, B. 2020. “Project concluding Report” of the project entitle “ Study on the effects of tree on soil fertility and crop production in Rajasthan” submitted to Rajasthan Forest Department, Jaipur, India. pp. 224.

Singh, B. and Singh G. 2003. Biomass partitioning and gas exchange in Dalbergia sissoo seedlings under water stress. Photosynthetica 41(3): 407-414.

Singh, B., Bishnoi M., Baloch M.R. and Singh G. 2014. Tree biomass, resource use and crop productivity in agri-horti-silvi systems in the dry region of Rajasthan, India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Sci, 60 8,1031- 1049,DOI:10.1080/03650340.2013.864386.

Singh, B., Bishnoi M., Chouhan A.S., Parihar K.L. and Singh G. 2024. Climatic variations influenced distribution and productivity of different agroforestry systems in Rajasthan, India. Annals of Arid Zone 63(3): 1-18.

Singh, G. 2004. “Project concluding Report” of the project entitle “Agroforestry research for sustainable production in arid and semi-arid region of Rajasthan. AFRI, Jodhpur, India. pp. 43.

Singh, G. 2010. Rainfall dependent competition effected productivity of V. radiata in Hardwickia binata agroforestry in Indian Desert. Indian Forester 136: 301-315.

Singh, G., Gupta, G.N. and Kuppusamy V. 2000. Seasonal variations in organic carbon and nutrient availability in arid zone agroforestry system. Tropical Ecology 41: 17-23.

Stahl, L., Nyberg G., Hogberg P. and Buresh R.J. 2002. Effects of planted tree fallows on soil nitrogen dynamics, above-ground and root biomass, N2- fixation and subsequent maize crop productivity in Kenya. Plant and Soil 243: 103-117.

Swieter, A., Langhof M. and Lamerre J. 2021. Competition, stress and benefits: Trees and crops in the transition zone of a temperate short rotation alley cropping agroforestry system. Journal of Agronomy and Soil Science. https://doi. org/10.1111/jac.12553

Syano, N.M., Nyangito M.M., Kironchi G. and Wasonga O.V. 2023. Agroforestry practices impacts on soil properties in the drylands of Eastern Kenya. Trees, Forests and People 14: 100437.

Tewari, J.C., Ram, M., Roy, M.M. and Dagar, J.C. 2014. Livelihood improvements and climate change adaptations through agroforestry in hot arid environments. Agroforestry systems in India: Livelihood Security and Ecosystem Services (Eds. J. C. Dagar et al. (eds.), Advance in Agroforestry, 10, DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1662- 9_6, _ Springer India 2014

Toky, O.P. and Bisht R.P. 1992. Observations on the rooting patterns of some agroforestry trees in an arid region of north-western India. Agroforestry Systems 18: 245-263.

Tumber-Davila, S.J., Schenk H.J., Du E. and Jackson R.B. 2022. Plant sizes and shapes above – and belowground and their interactions with climate. New Phytologist 235: 1032-1056. doi: 10.1111/ nph.18031

Udawatta, R.P., Walter, D. and Jose, S. 2023 Carbon sequestration by forests and agroforests: A reality check for the United States. Carbon Footprints 2: 2. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cf.2022.06

Upadhyaya, A.K., Soni, R.G. and Mathur, S.P. 1991. Initial growth rate of irrigated plantation in Stage-II area of Indira Gandhi Nahar Project. Current Agriculture 15: 15.21.

Upadhyaya, K., Ram, A., Dev, I., Kumar, N., Upadhyaya, S., Gautam, K. and Arunachalam, A. 2021. Above- and below-ground interactions in teak-barley agroforestry system in the Bundelkhand region of Central India. Ind J Agrofor 23(1): 41-47.

van Noordwijk, M., Lawson, G., Hairiah, K. and Wilson, J. 2015. Root distribution of trees and crops: Competition and/or complementarity. In: Tree-crop Interactions: Agroforestry in a Changing Climate (Eds. C.K. Ong, C. Black and J. Wilson), pp. 221-257. CAB International.

Varghese, N. and Singh, N.P. 2016. Linkages between land use changes, desertification and human development in the Thar Desert Region of India. Land Use Policy 51: 18-25.

Yadav, R.S., Yadav B.L. and Chhipa B.R. 2008. Litter dynamics and soil properties under different tree species in a semi-arid region of Rajasthan, India. Agroforty System 73: 1-12.

Yadava, N.D., Soni M.L., Nathawat N.S. and Birbal 2013. Productivity and Growth Indices of Intercrops in Agri-Horti-Silvi System in Arid Rajasthan. Annals of Arid Zone 52(1): 61-65.

Yadava, N.D., Soni M.L., Rathore V.S. and Nathawat N.S. 2018.Agri-horti-silvi system. for production stability in arid zone. Indian Farming 68(09): 33- 37.

Zhang, J., Gou, X., Alexander, M.R., Xia J., Wang, F., Zhang, F., Man, Z. and Pederson, N. 2021. Drought limits wood production of Juniperus przewalskii even as growing seasons lengthens in a cold and arid environment. CATENA 196, Article104936.