Morphological and Phenotypic Variability of Olive Varieties (Olea europaea sativa L.) in Algeria : Implications for Cultivation in Semi-Arid Regions

Bahlouli  Fayçal; Salamani  Amel; Chourghal  Nacira; Maamri  Khelifa

doi:10.56093/aaz.v65i3.175490

Authors

Bahlouli Fayçal Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Earth Sciences of the Universe, Mohamed El Bachir El Ibrahimi University of Bordj Bou Arréridj, Algeria
Salamani Amel Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Earth Sciences of the Universe, Mohamed El Bachir El Ibrahimi University of Bordj Bou Arréridj, Algeria
Chourghal Nacira Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Earth Sciences of the Universe, Mohamed El Bachir El Ibrahimi University of Bordj Bou Arréridj, Algeria
Maamri Khelifa Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Earth Sciences of the Universe, Mohamed El Bachir El Ibrahimi University of Bordj Bou Arréridj, Algeria

https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v65i3.175490

Keywords:

Olive tree, variety, characterization, behaviour, semi-arid

Abstract

The olive tree (Olea europaea L.) exhibits considerable genetic diversity, while environmental factors such as soil and microclimate contribute to phenotypic variation among varieties. This study evaluated the phenotypic and morphological characteristics of six olive varieties : Azeradj, Frontoio, Neb Djemel, Limli, Sigoise, and Chemlal cultivated under the semi-arid conditions of Bordj Bou Arréridj, Algeria. The objective was to characterize key morphological traits, including leaf, flower, and fruit characteristics, following the guidelines of the International Olive Council. The results showed that all varieties exhibited medium vegetative growth and elliptical-lanceolate leaves, with a floral formula of Z(4S) +(4P) + (2E) + 1C. Significant differences were observed among the varieties, particularly in tree width, trunk or main branch thickness, and leaf dimensions. Frontoio and Chemlal exhibited the highest numbers of flowers per branch and higher fruit-setting rates, indicating greater reproductive potential. Fruit size also varied among varieties, with Azeradj and Sigoise producing the largest fruits, whereas Chemlal produced the smallest. These differences may be associated with varietal characteristics and environmental conditions, particularly water availability. Overall, Frontoio and Chemlal showed superior reproductive characteristics under the study conditions. The findings highlight the importance of appropriate irrigation and soil management practices for improving olive productivity in semi-arid regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdessemed, S. 2017. Contribution to the characterization and identification of olive tree ecotypes (Olea europaea L.) in the Aurès region. Doctoral Thesis, University of Batna. 131 p.

Achour, A. 1995. Olive oil, 1st Edit, Ain M’lila Book House. 110 p.

Badr, S.A. and Hartmann, H.T. 1971. Effect of diurnally fluctuating and constant temperatures on flower induction and sex expression in olive (Olea europaea L.). Physiologia Plantarum 24: 40-45.

Barranco, D., Fernández-Escobar, R., and Rallo, L. 2017. Olive growing: The cultivation of olive trees. Madrid, Spain: Mundi-Prensa.

Barranco, D. and Rallo, L. 2000. Olive Growing (El cultivo del olivo) (2nd ed.). Madrid, Spain: Mundi- Prensa.

Barranco, D., Trujillo, I. and Rallo, P. 2000. Are oblonga and frantoio olive the same cultivar. Horticultural Science 35: 6.

Belaj, A., Trujillo, I., de la Rosa, R. and Rallo, L. 2001. Polymorphism and discrimination Capacity of randomly amplified polymorphic markers in an olive germplasm bank. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 126: 64-71.

Boukhari, R. 2014. Contribution to the genetic and characteristic analysis of some olive tree varieties and the influence of the environment on their yields in the wilaya of Tizi-Ouzou. Master’s Thesis in Agronomy. Univ. Tlemcen, Algeria. 120 p.

DSA 2021. Directorate of Agricultural Services of Bordj Bou Arreridj. Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria. Publisher: Directorate of Agricultural Services, 15 p.

Fernández, J. E. 2014. Understanding olive adaptation to abiotic stresses. Acta Horticulturae 1057, 25-42.

Fernández, J.E. and Moreno, F. 2015. Water use in olive orchards: A review of plant and soil water relations. Agricultural Water Management 155: 1-14.

Green, P.S. 2002. A revision of Olea L. (Oleaceae). Kew Bulletin 57: 91-140. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/4110824. Accessed 4 Aug. 2026.

IOC 1997. Methodology for Primary Characterization of Olive Varieties, Project RESGEN-CT (67/97), EU/ IOC, International Olive Council (IOC).

IOC 2011. Descriptors for olive varieties (Olea europaea L.). Madrid, Spain: IOC.

Lavee, S. 2010. Biology and physiology of the olive tree. In Proceedings of olive research reviews (various publications). Israel: Volcani Center.

Mendil, M. and Sebai, A. 2006. The olive tree in Algeria, overview of the indigenous genetic heritage. Technical Institute of Fruit Arboriculture and Vine, 99p.

Oreggia, O. and Marinelli, T. 2018. Flos OleIi. Del tribunal Di Roma. Italy.

Ouazzani, N., Lumaret, R. and Villemur, P. 1995. Contribution of Alloenzymatic polymorphism to the varietal identification of the Olive tree (Olea europaea L.). Agronomy 15: 31-37 pp.

Rugini, E. and Lavee, S. 2014. The Olive Tree: Biology and Production. Wallingford, UK: CABI.

Saad, D. 2009. Study of endomycorrhizas of the Sigoise olive variety (Olea europaea L.) and testing of their application to semi-woody cuttings. Doctoral Thesis, University of Ahmed Ben Bella, Oran 1, Algeria, 155p.

Villa, P. 2003. Olive Cultivation. Ed. De Vecchi, Paris, 143 p.