The Interactive Role of Human and Environmental Dimensions inl the Desertification Debate
95 / 80
Abstract
We summarize a new synthetic framework for understanding and responding. to desertification that emerged from the 88th Dahlem workshop on "An Integrated Assessment of the Ecological, Meteorological and Human Dimensions of Global Desertification". We refer to this framework as the Dahlem Desertification Paradigm. This paper then examines one thread through this framework - the chain of logic that runs from the assertion that simultaneous consideration of both the human and environmental aspects of desertification if critical for any advances on dealing with desertification and degradation at all scales; that the coupled human and environmental parts or the system change over time;' in ways that may be more or less dysfunctional; to emphasize the critical importance of assisting the rate of development of appropriate local environmental knowledge (LEK) in minimizing dysfunction. Given the increasing rates of change being imposed on our worlds, and the particular difficulties in developing experiential knowledge quickly in variable arid environments, we conclude that support for better integration of LEK with the scientific method is one critical pillar in creating a learning society in dry landsDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Submitted
15-12-2016
Published
15-12-2016
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Arid Zone Research Association of India

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Smith, M. S., & Reynolds, J. F. (2016). The Interactive Role of Human and Environmental Dimensions inl the Desertification Debate. Annals of Arid Zone, 42(3-4). https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v42i3 & 4.65574






