The Interactive Role of Human and Environmental Dimensions inl the Desertification Debate


95 / 80

Authors

  • Mark Stafford Smith Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre, PO Box 2111, Alice Springs, NT 0871 Australia
  • James F Reynolds Department of Biology & Division of Environmental Science and Policy, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 USA

https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v42i3%20&%204.65574

Abstract

We summarize a new synthetic framework for understanding and responding. to desertification that emerged from the 88th Dahlem workshop on "An Integrated Assessment of the Ecological, Meteorological and Human Dimensions of Global Desertification". We refer to this framework as the Dahlem Desertification Paradigm. This paper then examines one thread through this framework - the chain of logic that runs from the assertion that simultaneous consideration of both the human and environmental aspects of desertification if critical for any advances on dealing with desertification and degradation at all scales; that the coupled human and environmental parts or the system change over time;' in ways that may be more or less dysfunctional; to emphasize the critical importance of assisting the rate of development of appropriate local environmental knowledge (LEK) in minimizing dysfunction. Given the increasing rates of change being imposed on our worlds, and the particular difficulties in developing experiential knowledge quickly in variable arid environments, we conclude that support for better integration of LEK with the scientific method is one critical pillar in creating a learning society in dry lands

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Submitted

15-12-2016

Published

15-12-2016

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Smith, M. S., & Reynolds, J. F. (2016). The Interactive Role of Human and Environmental Dimensions inl the Desertification Debate. Annals of Arid Zone, 42(3-4). https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v42i3 & 4.65574
Citation