Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Microbes and Enzyme Activity in the Rumen of Buffaloes
174 / 45
Keywords:
Buffalo, Enzymes, Microbes, Rumen Content Fractions, Real Time PcrAbstract
Information about abundance of rumen microbes is a prerequisite to assess the fermentation in rumen during any dietary intervention. However, conventional techniques are not able to enumerate majority of microbes as majority of rumen microbes are uncultivable. Real time PCR (qPCR) has successfully been used for quantification of various rumen microbes like rumen cellulolytic bacteria, protozoa, fungi, methanogens etc. In this experiment, the whole rumen content (WRC) was squeezed to particulate matter (PM) and squeezed rumen liquor (SL), whereas, the fourth fraction, strained rumen liquor (SRL) of rumen content was obtained by filtering through a probe with double layer of muslin cloth. The population of total bacteria, fungi, Ruminococcus albus, R. flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes, total methanogens, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and protozoa were estimated in different fractions of rumen content at 0, 4 and 8 h post-feeding by real time PCR using specific primers. The numbers of these microbes were significantly (P<0.001) higher in WRC and PM as compared to SRL and RL. The activities of carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase), avicelase, amylase, xylanase, β-glucosidase and urease were significantly (P<0.05) higher in WRC and PM as compared to SRL and RL. The activities of CMCase and urease were higher (P<0.05) at 4 and 8 h post feeding, whereas, rest of the enzymes were not affected. There was no effect of time of sampling on the population of rumen microbes explored in this experiment. It appeared that WRC or PM fraction provided true picture of microbial and enzyme profiles responsible for fibre degradation in the rumen. The increase in enzyme activity at a particular time of sampling was not associated with population size of the specific microbes or specific activity of enzymes.
References
Agarwal, N., Agarwal, I., Kamra, D.N. and Chaudhary, L.C. 2000. Diurnal variations in the activities of hydrolytic enzymes in different fractions of rumen contents of Murrah buffalo. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 18: 73–80.
Bowen, J.M., McCabe, M.S., Lister, S.J., Cormican, P. and Dewhurst, R.J.2018. Evaluation of microbial communities associated with the liquid and solid phases of the rumen of cattle offered a diet of perennial ryegrass or white clover. Front. Microbiol. 9:2389.
Brock, F.M., Frosberg, C.W. and Buchanan-Smith, J.G. 1982. Proteolytic activity of rumen microorganisms and effect of proteinase inhibitors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44:561–569.
Chen, J. and Weimer, J.P. 2001. Competition among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in the absence or presence of non-cellulolytic bacteria. J. Microbiol. 147: 21-30.
Chen, X.L., Wang, J.K., Wu, Y.M. and Liu, J.X. 2008. Effects of chemical treatments of rice straw on rumen fermentation characteristics, fibrolytic enzyme activities and populations of liquid- and solid-associated ruminal microbes in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 141:1-14.
Dai, X., Tian, Y., Li, J., Su, X. and Wang, W. 2015. Metatranscriptomic analyses of plant cell wall polysaccharide degradation by microorganisms in the cow rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81:1376-1386.
de Mulder, T., Goossens, K., Peiren, N., Vandaele, L., Haegeman, A., de Tender, C., Tom Ruttink, T., de Wiele, T.V. and De Campeneere s. 2017. Exploring the methanogen and bacterial communities of rumen environments: solid adherent, fluid and epimural. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93: 251.
Denman, S.E. and McSweeney, C.S. 2006. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 58:572–582
Flint, H.J., Bayer, E.A., Rincon, M.T., Lamed, R. and White, B.A. 2008. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 121-131.
Hristov, A.N., McAllister, T.A. and Cheng, K.J. 1999. Effect of diet, digesta processing, freezing and extraction procedure on carboxy-methyl cellulase, xylanase and amylase activities of rumen contents. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 73–81.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research. 2013. Nutrients Requirement for Livestock and Poultry, ICAR, New Delhi
Lengowski, M.B., Zuber, K.H.R., Witzig, M., Möhring, J., Boguhn, J. and Rodehutscord, M. 2016. Changes in rumen microbial community composition during adaption to an in vitro system and the impact of different forages. PLoS ONE. 11: e0150115.
Kala, A., Kamra, D.N., Agarwal, N. and Chaudhary, L.C. 2020. Effect of a blend of commercial Ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi) oil and nitrate on the fermentation and microbial profile of buffalo rumen. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol. 20: 141-153.
Kala, A., Kamra, D.N., Agarwal, N. and Chaudhary, L.C. 2017a. Effect of a blend of essential oils on buffalo rumen microbial and enzyme profiles and in vitro feed fermentation. Anim Nutr Feed Technol. 189-200.
Kala, A., Kamra, D.N., Kumar, A., Agarwal, N., Chaudhary, L.C. and Joshi, C.G. 2017b. Impact of levels of Total digestible nutrients on microbiome, enzyme profile and degradation of feeds in buffalo rumen. PLoS ONE. 12: e0172051.
Kamra, D.N. 2005. Rumen microbial ecosystem. Curr. Sci. 89:124-135.
Kamra, D.N. and Pathak, N.N. 1996. Nutritional Microbiology of Farm Animals, 1– 224. Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi,
Klieve, A.V. and Bauchop, T. 1988. Morphological diversity of ruminal bacteriophages from sheep and cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:1637–1641.
Kobayashi, Y. 2006. Inclusion of novel bacteria in rumen microbiology: need for basic and applied science. Anim. Sci. J. 77:375–385
Koike, S. and Kobayashi, Y. 2001. Development and use of competitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolytic bacteria: Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 204:361–366
Li, M., Penner, G.B., Hernandez-Sanabria, E., Oba, M. and Guan, L.L. 2009. Effects of sampling location and time, and host animal on assessment of bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in the bovine rumen J. Appl. Microbiol. 107:1924–1934.
Malmuthuge, N., Li, M., Chen, Y., Fries, P., Griebel, P.J., Baurhoo, G.B., Zhao, X. and Guan, L.L. 2012. Distinct commensal bacteria associated with ingesta and mucosal epithelium in the gastrointestinal tracts of calves and chickens. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 79: 337–347.
Miller, G.L. 1959. Use of dinitrosalisylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analyt. Chem. 31:26–428.
Ritalahti, K.M., Amos, B.K., Sung, Y., Wu, Q. and Koenigsber, S.S. 2006. Quantitative PCR targeting 16S rRNA and reductive dehalogenase Genes simultaneously monitors multiple Dehalococcoides strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:2765-2774.
Shewale, J.G. and Sadana, J.C. 1978. Cellulase and b-glucosidase by a basidomycete species. Can. J. Microbiol. 24:1204-1216.
Sylvester, J.T., Karnati, S.K., Yu, Z., Morrison, M. and Firkins, J.L. 2004. Development of an Assay to Quantify Rumen Ciliate Protozoal Biomass in Cows Using Real-Time PCR. J. Nutr. 134:123378-3384.
Tajima, K., Nagamine, T., Matsui, H., Nakamura, M. and Aminov, R.I. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA libraries from the rumen suggests the existence of a novel group of archaea not associated with known methanogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 200:67–72.
Wanapat, M., and Cherdthong, A. 2009. Use of real-time PCR technique in studying rumen cellulolytic bacteria population as affected by level of roughage in swamp buffalo. Curr. Microbiol. 8:294–299.
Weatherburn, M.W. 1967. Phenol hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analyt. Chem. 39:971–974.
Yu, Z. and Morrison, M. 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from .digesta and fecal samples. Bio Techniques. 36:808-812.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright remains with the society and author jointly. However, material can be used for research, teaching and to achieve goals of the society.