Effect of Time of Sowing, Seed Rate, and Cultivar onOat Green Fodder, Dry Matter and Crude Protein Yield


179 / 18

Authors

  • B. Murali AICRP on Forage Crops & Utilization, AgriculturalResearchInstitute,ProfessorJayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University,Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 500030, India
  • R. Susheela, AICRP on Forage Crops & Utilization, AgriculturalResearchInstitute,ProfessorJayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University,Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 500030, India
  • M. Shanti AICRP on Forage Crops & Utilization, Agricultural Research Institute, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 500030, India
  • T. Shashikala AICRP on Forage Crops & Utilization, Agricultural Research Institute, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 500030, India

Keywords:

Cultivar, Fodder oat, Sowing time, Seed rate

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to find out suitable sowing time, optimum seed rate, and right cultivar of fodder oat for Telangana. The treatments consisted of 16 combinations with four times of sowing (first fortnight of October, second fortnight of October, first fortnight of November, and second fortnight of November), two seed rates (80 and 100 kg/ha), and two fodder oat cultivars (JHO 822 and Kent). The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design and replicated thrice in sandy loam soil. Two-year (2016-17 & 2017-18) pooled data analysis results revealed that green fodder yield, dry matter yield, and crude protein yields recorded were significantly (p<0.05) higher with the crop sown during the first fortnight of November followed by the second fortnight of October. Plant height and tiller number per meter row length also responded similarly. No significant difference was observed among the two seed rates for plant height, the number of tillers/meter row, green, and dry fodder yields except crude protein where 100 kg/ha seed rate recorded higher crude protein yield than 80 kg/ha seed rate. Cultivars significantly differed in plant height and crude protein yield only. All the interaction effects were found to be non-significant. The best sowing window for obtaining higher fodder yield and quality of oat in Telangana was found to be from the second fortnight of October to the first fortnight of November.

 

 

References

Dar, N.A., Singh, K.N., Ahmad. L., Sofi, J.A., Bhat, M.E. andKotru, R. 2014. Influence of dates of sowing, cultivars and different fertility levels on fodder oat (Avens sativa L.) under temperate conditions of Kashmir valley. Range Manag.Agrofor. 35: 51-55.

Droushiotis, D.N. 1990. Effect of variety, seed rate and cutting stage on the forage yield of oats (Avena sativa).Agricultural Research Institute Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources Nicosia. Technical Bulletin 118 September 1990. pp.1- 9.

Erega, Y.,Nigusie, F. andAnimut, G. 2020. Effects of seed rate and nitrogen fertilizer rate on growth and biomass yield of oat (Avena Sativa L.).World J. Agric. Soil Sci.4:1-8.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A.1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons Publishers, New York. pp.97-107.

Jehangir, I.A., Khan, H.U., Khan, M.H., Ur-Rasool, F., Bhat, R.A.and Mubarak, T.2013. Effect of sowing dates, fertility levels and cutting managements on growth, yield and quality of oats (Avena sativa L.) African J. Agric. Res.8:648-65.

Kadam, S.S., Solanki, N.S., Arif, Md., Dashora, L.N., Mundra, S.L. and Upadhyay, B. 2019. Productivity and Quality of Fodder Oats (Avena sativa L.) as influenced by Sowing Time, Cutting Schedules and Nitrogen Levels. Indian J.Anim.Nutr. 36: 179-186.

Kumar, G.V.S., Sukanya, T.S., Jayaramaiah, R., Somashekar, K.S. and Pratima, N. M. 2021. Green fodder yield and quality of fodder oats (Avena sativa) as influenced by dates of sowing and nitrogen levels in Southern transition zone of Karnataka. J.Pharmacog.Phytoch. 10: 1475-1479.

Kumar, S., Agrawal, R.K., Dixit, A.K., Rai, A.K. and Rai, S.K. 2012. ForageCrops and Their Management. Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi UP India Technology Bulletin No. 02/2012; 19-21.

May, W.E., Mohr, R.M., Lafond, G.P., Johnston, A.M. and Stevenson, F.C. 2004. Effect of nitrogen, seeding date, and cultivar on oat quality and yield in the eastern Canadian prairies. Canadian J.Plant Sci. 84: 1025–103.

Sharma, V., Singh, P. and Sharma, S. 2017. Effect of sowing dates and initial cutting time on forage yield and quality of oat in mid hills of North West Himalayas. Int. J. Sci. Env. Technol. 6:2030 – 2035.

Shekara, B.G. and Lohithaswa, H.C. 2012. Effect of time of sowing, seed rate and planting geometry on greenforage yield and quality of fodder oat. Forage Res. 38:122-124.

Sheron, O.P., Tonk, D.S., Kaushik, L.S., Hasija, R.C. andPannu, R.S.1998.Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. OPSTAT. (http://14.139.232.166/opstat/)

Sidhu, M.S., Sharma, G.D., Kumar, N., Chahal, A., Rana, M.C. and Sharma, R.P. 2020. Herbage yield, nutritive value and soil properties of annual ryegrass (Loliummultiflorum Lam) as affected by sowing time and varying levels of nitrogen. Forage Res. 46: 163-167.

Singh, S., Singh, K. and Kaur, T. 2021.Effect of Different Sowing Dates and Timings of Last Cut on Yield Attributes and Seed Yield of Berseem (Trifolium alexandrinumL.). Legume Res. 44:574-578.

Singh, T.R.V., Singh, A., Singh, S.K., Sahu, D.S., Chandra S. andDhyani, B.P. 2018. Influence of seed rate and nitrogen levels on yield, major nutrients content in forage oat crop (Avena sativa L.) and available NPK status of soil after harvest. Bull. Env., Pharmacol. Life Sci.7: 61-66.

Sood, B.R., Singh, R.and Sharma, V.K. 1992. Effect of sowing dates and cutting management on forage yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa). ForageRes. 18:130-134.

Downloads

Submitted

02-05-2022

Published

31-12-2021

Issue

Section

Ruminant

How to Cite

Murali, B., Susheela, R., Shanti, M., & Shashikala, T. (2021). Effect of Time of Sowing, Seed Rate, and Cultivar onOat Green Fodder, Dry Matter and Crude Protein Yield. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 38(4). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAN/article/view/123535