Evaluation of Super Napier (Pennisetum purpureum × P. glaucum) as Ruminant Feedstuff by In vitro and In situ Methods
630 / 40
Keywords:
Chemical composition, In vitro digestibility, In situ degradability, Super NapierAbstract
ABSTRACT
In India, the ruminant animal production faces challenges due to insufficient availability of feedstuffs and low-quality of forage crops. To address these issues, cultivating high-yielding, nutritious varieties like Super napier (Pennisetum purpureum × P. glaucum) and conserving them is vital to sustain ruminant farming. Hence, an attempt was made to assess Super Napier (SN) hay as ruminant feedstuff byin vitro and in situ methods. Initially, SN hay was subjected to rumen in vitro gas production study (RIVGP), with cumulative gas production measured at various time intervals up to 96 h post incubation. Subsequently, invitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD) were determined using a modified two-stage in vitro technique. Further, SN hay was subjected to a 96 h ruminal incubation to evaluate dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) degradability using in situ method. The chemical analysis of SN hay revealedthat it contains organic matter (OM)- 87.23%, CP - 9.96%, NDF - 72.75% and ADF - 47.44% on dry matter basis. In the rumen kinetics study, the potential gas production (D) was 56.96 mL, with the rate of gas production (c) 0.035 h-1. The IVDMD and NDFD of SN hay were 68.66% and 40.52%, respectively. The potential in situ degradability and degradation rate for DM, CP, and NDF of SN hay were 68.47 % at 0.049 h-1, 73.04% at 0.048 h-1 and 62.03% at 0.044 h-1, respectively. Further, the estimated metabolizable energy (ME) of SN hay was 7.22 MJ/kg DM. Thus, SN hay with good amount of gas production, in vitro DM and NDF digestibility and in situ DM, CP and NDF degradability can be considered as a good source of basal fodder feedstuff for ruminant production.
References
AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th Edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Bergman, E.N. 1990. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiological Reviews. 70(2):567-590.
Bhatta, R., Saravanan, M., Baruah, L., Malik, P. and Sampath, K. 2016. Nutrient composition, rate of fermentation and in vitro rumen methane output from tropical feedstuffs. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 155(1):171-183.
Blummel, M. 2000. Predicting the partitioning of fermentation products by combined in vitro gas volume and true substrate degradability measurements: opportunities and limitations. In: Proceedings of British Society of Animal Science on gas production: Fermentation kinetics for feed evaluation and to assess microbial activity. 48-58.
Blummel, M., Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. 1997. In vitrogas production-a technique revised. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 77: 24–34.
Cherdthong,A., Rakwongrit, D., Wachirapakorn, C., Haitook, T., Khantharin, S., Tangmutthapattharakun, G. and Saising, T. 2015. Effect of Leucaena silage and Napier Pakchong 1 silage supplementation on feed intake, rumen ecology and growth performance in Thai native cattle. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal. 43(Suppl. 1):484–490
Chiou, P.W.S., Chen, K.J., Kuo, K.S., Hsu, J.C. and Yu, B. 1995. Studies on the protein degradabilities of feedstuffs in Taiwan. Animal Feed Science Technology. 55: 215–226
Diriba, G. and Vaars, R. 2000. Productivity of Panicum coloratum under varying stages of harvest, low level of nitrogen fertilizer and in combination with Stylosanthes during establishment year. M.Sc. thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.
Filípek, J. and Dvoøák, R. 2009. Determination of the volatile fatty acid content in the rumen liquid: comparison of gas chromatography and capillary isotachophoresis. Acta Veterinaria Brunensis. 78: 627–633.
Garg, M.R., Kannan, A., Shelke, S.K., Phondba, B.T. and Sherasia, P.L. 2012. Nutritional evaluation of some ruminant feedstuffs by in vitro gas production technique. Indian Journal of Animal Science. 82(8):898-902.
Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications). Agriculture Handbook. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
ICAR. 2013. Nutrient Requirements of Cattle and Buffalo. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, India
Jagadeesh, C.H., Reddy, R.Y., Nagalakshmi, D., Mahender, M., Kumari Nalini, N., Sridhar, K. and Devi Suneetha, K.B. 2017. Effect of stage of harvest on the yield, chemical composition, in vitro and in sacco digestibility of hybrid napier (Penniserum purpureum) variety APB N1. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 51(1): 116-120.
Krishnamoorthy, U., Soller, H., Steingass and Menke, H.K.1995. Energy and protein evaluation of tropical feedstuffs for whole tract and ruminal digestion by chemical analyses and rumen inoculum studies in vitro, Animal Feed Science and Technology. 52: 177-188.
Liangco, N.C., Reyes, J.L., Gaffud, O.M., Pascua, E.M., Jamsawat, V and Seatung, C. 2019.Study on chemical composition of Super Napier grass silage treated with Lactobacillus Buchneri and Lactobacillus Plantarum. Journal of Mycology and Mycological Science. 2(2): 000109.
Licitra, G., Hernandez, T.M. and Van Soest, P.J. 1996. Standardisation of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Scienceand Technology. 57:347e58.
Licitra, G., Van Soest, P.J., Schadt, I., Carpinoc, S. and Sniffen, C.J. 1998. Influence of the concentration of the protease from Streptomyces griseus relative to ruminal protein degradability. Animal Feed Science andTechnology. 77: 113
Menke, K.H. and Steingass, H. 1988.Estimation of the energetic feed value from chemical analysis and in vitrogas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development. 28:7–55.
Molla, E.A., Wondimagegn, B.A. and Chekol, Y.M. 2018. Evaluation of biomass yield and nutritional quality of oats–vetch mixtures at different harvesting stage under residual moisture in Fogera District, Ethiopia. Agriculture and Food Security. 7:88.
Nelson, B.D., Ellzey, H.D., Montgomery, C. and Morgan, E.B. 1972. Factors affecting the variabilityof an in vitro rumen fermentation technique forestimating forage quality. Journal of Dairy Science. 55:358.
Ningal, N. 2020. Napier grass rumen degradability in sacco in goats (Capra hircus aegagrus) supplemented with different sources and amount of dietary fats. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment. 9:177-194.
Okoruwa, M.and Igene, F. 2014. Comparison of fermentation kinetics (in vitro) of Napier grass and fruit peels for ruminants: The pattern of organic matter degradability, volatile fatty acids concentration, estimated methane and microbial biomass production. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 7:21-28.
Orskov, E.R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The Estimation of Protein Degradability in the Rumen from Incubation Measurements Weighed According to Rate of Passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 92:499
Ravindra, D., Ramachandra, B., Thirumalesh, T., Shrikant, K.,Suranagi, M.D., Vivek, M.P. and Jaishankar, N. 2021. Dry matter intake, nutritive value and digestibility of Super Napier fed to adult Kenguri sheep. Journal of Experimental Zoology, India. 25:279- 282.
Roy, A.K., Agrawal, R.K., Bhardwaj, N.R., Mishra, A.K. and Mahanta, S.K. 2019. Revisiting National Forage Demand and Availability Scenario. In: Indian Fodder Scenario: Redefining State Wise Status (eds. A. K. Roy, R. K. Agrawal, N. R. Bhardwaj). ICAR- AICRP on Forage Crops and Utilization, Jhansi, India, pp. 1-21.
Sarian, Z.B. 2013 ‘A super grass from Thailand.’ Available at http://zacsarian.
Com/2013/06/01/a-super-grass-from-thailand/ [Verified 2 June 2023]
Singh, C.K., Robinson, P.H. and Mc Niven, M.A. 1995. Evaluation of raw and roasted lupin seeds as protein supplement for lactating cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 52: 63-76.
Sravani, B., Raja Kishore, K., Srinivas Kumar, D.and Kalyana Chakravarthi, M. 2021. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of ram lambs fed concentrate mixture containing varyinglevels of cashew nut kernel meal. Journal of Animal Research. 11(3): 471-476.
Tilley, J.M. and Terry, R.A. 1963. A two stage step for in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society. 18: 104.
Turano, B., Tiwari, U.P.and Rajesh, J. 2016. Growth and nutritional evaluation of napier grass hybrids as forage for ruminants. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales. 4. 168. 10.17138/TGFT(4)168-178.
Van Soest, P.J. 1982. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. O&B Books, Cornallis, OR.
Van Soest, P.J. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of Ruminants. Second Edition, Cornell University Press, London, p. 476.
Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergentfiber, and non-starch polysaccharides inrelation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74:3583–3597.
Wadi, A., Ishii, Y. and Idota, S. 2004. Effect of cutting interval and cutting height and dry matter yield and overwintering ability at the established year in Pennisetum species. Plant Production Science. 7: 88-96.
Weerathunga, D., Udagama, D., Campbell, S.,Barber, D. and Weerasinghe, P. 2023. Performance of the Napier Hybrid Cultivars CO-5 (Pennisetum glaucum × P. purpureum schumach) and Sampoorna (Pennisetum pedicillatum × P. americanum) harvested at five intervals. Grasses. 2(3): 156-167.
Weiss, W.P., Conrad, H.R. and Pierre, N.S. 1992. A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 39(1–2):95–110.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright remains with the society and author jointly. However, material can be used for research, teaching and to achieve goals of the society.