Effect of Combination of Physical Pretreatment on Toxic Factors and Nutritional Value of Canola Meal


127 / 19

Authors

  • Neeti lakhani Assistant Professor, GADVASU
  • Amit Sharma Associate Professor, GADVASU
  • Anand Prakash Assistant Professor
  • Priya
  • J.S.Hundal
  • Yashwant Singh

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijan.v42i3.

Keywords:

Anti Nutritional Factors, Canola meal, Erucic acid, Glucosinolate, Soaking

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of combination of soaking in water with heat treatment on nutritional characteristics of canola meal and certain anti nutritional factors. In a 2 X 2 X 2 factorial design, canola meal was soaked in water for 12 and 24 hours (h) followed by heating at 80 and 100oC for 30 min and 60 min respectively. Crude protein and fat content of canola meal increased significantly (P<0.05) with soaking for 24 h followed by heating at 100oC. NDF content reduced with increasing soaking time and heat treatment. Glucosinolate and erucic acid content reduced significantly (P<0.05) with soaking at 24 h followed by heat treatment for 60 min irrespective of the temperature. Results of this study indicate that combination of high temperature heating (100 °C for 60 min) and soaking (24 h) may be necessary to reduce the toxic compounds and improve nutritional characteristics of canola meal.

Author Biographies

  • Neeti lakhani, Assistant Professor, GADVASU

    Assistant Professor, dept of Animal Nutrition, COVS Rampura Phul

  • Amit Sharma, Associate Professor, GADVASU

    Associate Professor, Dept of LPM

  • Anand Prakash, Assistant Professor

    Assistant Professor, Poultry science

References

Alireza S. 2010. Effect of frying process on fatty acid composition and iodine value of selected vegetable oils and their blends. International Food Research Journal. 17(2): 295–302.

Baenas, N., Cartea, M. E., Moreno, D. A., Tortosa, M., Francisco, M., in: C. M. Galanakis, (Ed.), Glucosinolates: Properties, Recovery, and Applications, Academic Press, Cambridge 2020, p. 181.

Bau, H. M., Villlaume, C., Nicolas, J. P., Mejean, L. 1997. Effect of germination on chemical composition, biochemical constitutents, and antinutritional factors of soya bean (Glycine max) seeds. Journal Science Food Agriculture. 73: 1–9.

Bell, J. M. 1993. Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal: A review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 73: 619-697.

Burakowska, K., Górka, P., Kent-Dennis, C., Kowalski, Z. M., Laarveld, B and Penner, G, B. 2019. Effect of heat-treated canola meal and glycerol inclusion on performance and gastrointestinal development of Holstein calves. Journal Dairy Science.103(9): 7998-8019.

Cartea, M. E and Velasco, P. 2008. Glucosinolates in Brassica foods: Bioavailability in food and significance for human health. Phytochemical Review. 7: 213–229.

Chopra, A.K., Malik, N.S., Makker, G.S. andIchhponani, J.S. 1971. Evaluation of poultryfeeds available in India. 1. Proximate analysis, energy values and basic amino-acid contentsof feed ingredients. Journal of Research-Punjab Agricultural University. 8(2): 232

Dawodu, M. O., Olutona, G. O and Obimakinde, S. O. 2015. Effect of temperature on the chemical characteristics of vegetable oils consumed in Ibadan, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal Nutrition. 14(10): 698

Ghazalah, A. A., El-Kaiaty, A. M., Hady, F. A. and Radwan, A. S. 2022. Chemical And Biological Evaluation Of Egyptian Canola Meal For Chickens Diets. Journal of Animal & Plant Science. 32(4): 934-944.

Jensen, S. K., Yong-Gang, L. and Eggum, B.O.1995.The effect of heat treatment on glucosinolates and nutritional value of rapeseed meal in rats. Animal Feed Scienceand Technology. 53(1): 17-28.

Khajali, F. and Slominski, B. A. 2012. Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry. Poultry Science. 91(10): 2564-2575.

Mansour, E. H., Dworschák, E., Lugasi, A., Gaál, O., Barna, E. and Gergely A. 1993.Effect of processing on the antinutritive factors and nutritive value of rapeseed products. Food Chemistry. 47(3): 247-252.

Mawlong, I., Sujith, K. M. S., Gurung, B., Singh, K. H, and Singh, D. 2017. A simple spectrophotometric method for estimating total glucosinolates in mustard de-oiled cake. International Journal Food Properties. 20(12): 3274–3281.

Mohamadzadeh, J., Sadeghi-Mahoonak, A., Yaghbani, M. and Aalami, M. 2009. Effect of Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Canola Seeds on Dehulling Efficiency and Oil Quality. World Journal Dairy & Food Science. 4(1): 14-18.

Piotr, M., Katarzyna, S. and Paweł, G. 2020. Effect of heat treatment and heat treatment in combination with lignosulfonate on in situ rumen degradability of canola cake crude protein, lysine, and methionine. Canadian Journal Animal Science. 100(1): 165-174.

Ravichandiran, S., Sharma, K., Dutta, N., Pattanaik, A. K., Chauhan, J. S. and Agnihotri, A. 2008. Comparative assessment of soybean meal with high and low glucosinolate rapeseed–mustard cake as protein supplement on performance of growing crossbred calves. Journal Science Food and Agriculture. 88(5): 832-838.

Russo, M., Yan, F., Stier, A., Klasen, L. and Honermeier, B. 2021. Erucic acid concentration of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) oils on the German food retail market. Food science & nutrition. 9(7): 3664–3672.

Sharma, A. and Nagra, S. S. 2009. Evaluation of canola and mustard meal as a partial replacement of soybean meal for feeding to broiler chicks. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 26 (1):77-82.

Sinha, S., Kumar, A., Sohane, R. K. and Kumar, R. 2020. Breeding of oilseeds: a challenge for self-sufficiency. Proceedings-cum-Abstract Book.

Sønderby, I. E., Geu-Flores, F. andHalkier, B. A. 2010. Biosynthesis of glucosinolates–gene discovery and beyond. Trends Plant Science. 15: 283–290.

The Energy and Resources Institute, NATP on Sustainable Management of Plant Biodiversity: Chemical Characterization of Rapeseed–mustard for Glucosinolate Content. 2003. TERI project report no. 993364. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, ICAR, New Delhi, p. 58.

Tripathi, M. K. and Mishra, A. S. 2007. Glucosinolates in animal nutrition: A review. Anim. Feed Science and Technology. 132(1–2): 1-27.

Widharna, R. M. 2012. Evaluation Of Means of Reducing Glucosinolate In Canola Meal. JurnalMedika Planta. 1(5): 24-35.

Woyengo, T. A., Beltranena, E. andZijlstra, R. T. 2014. Nonruminant nutrition symposium: Controlling feed cost by including alternative ingredients into pig diets: A review. Journal Animal Science. 92: 1293–1305.

Downloads

Submitted

12-10-2024

Published

07-01-2026

Issue

Section

Ruminant

How to Cite

lakhani, N., Amit Sharma, Anand Prakash, Priya, J.S.Hundal, & Yashwant Singh. (2026). Effect of Combination of Physical Pretreatment on Toxic Factors and Nutritional Value of Canola Meal. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijan.v42i3.