On-Farm Evaluation of Seed Biopriming Technology for Enhancing Germination and Seed Yield of Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)
6 / 11
Keywords:
front-line demonstration, seed biopriming, cumin, technology index, benefit–cost ratio, Bacillus paramycoides; Pseudomonas aeruginosaAbstract
Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) suffers from small seed size, low seed vigour and poor, non-uniform field establishment, which constrains productivity in the arid and semi-arid tracts of Rajasthan. A seed-biopriming technology combining the soaking agent chitosan with a two-strain rhizobacterial consortium (Bacillus paramycoides and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) was earlier standardised and validated at the institute level. To assess its performance under real farming conditions, ten front-line demonstrations (FLDs) were conducted under SCSP on farmers' fields across seven villages of Ajmer district during the 2025 Rabi season. In each demonstration the bioprimed technology and the prevailing farmers' practice (non-bioprimed seed) were raised in adjacent, paired plots on the same field. Biopriming increased mean germination from 70.22% to 82.08% (16.9% gain) and mean seed yield from 426.0 to 516.0 kg ha⁻¹ (21.1% gain); both differences were significant (paired t-test, p < 0.01, n = 10) and every demonstration recorded higher germination and yield than its paired control. The extension gap was 90.0 kg ha⁻¹, the technology gap 12.3 kg ha⁻¹ and the technology index 2.33%, showing that farmers realised almost the full yield potential of the technology. Economic analysis showed that the bioprimed technology, at a marginal additional cost of Rs 900 ha⁻¹, raised the benefit–cost ratio from 2.24 (farmers' practice) to 2.66 and generated an additional net return of Rs 24,297 ha⁻¹, a return of Rs 28 for every rupee invested in biopriming. The on-farm yield advantage (21.1%) closely reproduced the station-level advantage (20.8%), confirming that the technology is robust and transferable. Seed biopriming with chitosan and the B. paramycoides–P. aeruginosa consortium is therefore recommended as a low-cost, profitable and sustainable intervention for improving cumin establishment, yield and farm income.
Downloads
References
Ashraf M, Foolad MR. 2005. Pre-sowing seed treatment—a shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non-saline conditions. Adv Agron. 88:223–271.
Madhukeshwara BP, Sajjan AS. 2017. Influence of bio-priming on field performance and yield in maize hybrid. Acta Sci Agric. 1(1):16–19.
Mahdavi B, Rahimi A. 2013. Seed priming with chitosan improves the germination and growth performance of ajowan. Eurasian J Biosci. 7:69–76.
Mirshekari B, Hokmalipour S, Sharifi RS. 2012. Effect of seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield and dry matter accumulation of spring barley. J Food Agric Environ. 10:314–320.
Mishra BK, Jangir CK, Saxena SN, Sharma YK, Kant K, Mahatma MK, Bhardwaj V. 2026. Improving seed germination indices and yield in cumin through organic biopriming with microbial consortia and soaking agents: laboratory and field investigations. Biol Agric Hortic. doi:10.1080/01448765.2026.2635965.
Piri R, Moradi A, Balouchi H, Salehi A. 2019. Improvement of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) seed performance under drought stress by seed coating and biopriming. Sci Hortic. 257:108667.
Samui SK, Maitra S, Roy DK, Mandal AK, Saha D. 2000. Evaluation of front line demonstration on groundnut. J Indian Soc Coastal Agric Res. 18(2):180–183.
Sarkar D, Singh S, Parihar M, Rakshit A. 2021. Seed bio-priming with microbial inoculants: a tailored approach towards improved crop performance, nutritional security and agricultural sustainability for smallholder farmers. Curr Res Environ Sustain. 3:100093.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Seed Spices

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



