Evaluation of clinical outcomes following conventional right flank and laparoscopic ovariectomy in female dogs
60 / 48
Authors
-
Vilas D.
Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bikaner- 334001(Rajasthan)
-
Mahendra Tanwar
Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bikaner- 334001(Rajasthan)
-
Sakar Palecha
Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bikaner- 334001(Rajasthan)
-
K. Kachwaha
Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bikaner- 334001(Rajasthan)
-
M.L. Sharma
Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bikaner- 334001(Rajasthan)
-
P. Bishnoi
Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bikaner- 334001(Rajasthan)
Keywords:
Dog, Laparoscopic ovariectomy, Pain, Right flank ovariectomyAbstract
A study was conducted on 12 female dogs to compare the outcomes of conventional and laparoscopic ovariectomy techniques. The animals were randomly divided into two equal groups: group A underwent conventional right flank ovariectomy, while group B underwent laparoscopic ovariectomy using a threeport technique. All procedures were performed under a standardized anaesthetic protocol. No significant differences were observed in vital parameters such as heart rate, respiratory rate, and rectal temperature between the groups. In both groups, no significant changes were seen in blood glucose levels pre- and postoperatively. Postoperative serum cortisol levels and pain scores increased non-significantly in both groups; however, group A consistently demonstrated higher cortisol concentrations and pain scores than group B. The duration of surgery was significantly (P<0.05) shorter in group A (65.50±6.11 min) compared to group B (105.30±8.42 min). Complications such as haemorrhage, difficulty in ovarian resection, and wound dehiscence were recorded in both groups. Although laparoscopic ovariectomy was more time consuming, it was associated with reduced postoperative discomfort, indicating a potential welfare advantage over the conventional approach.
Downloads
References
Afshar, F.S., Shekarian, M., Baniadam, A., Avizeh, R., Najafzadeh, H. and Pourmehdi, M. 2017. Comparison of different tools for pain assessment
following ovariohysterectomy in bitches. Iranian J. Vet. Med. 11: 255-265.
Austin, B., Lanz, O.I., Hamilton, S.M., Broadstone, R.V. and Martin, R.A. 2003. Laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy in nine dogs. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 39: 391-396.
Bakhtiari, J., Mokaram, S., Khalaj, A., Sharifi, D. and Tavakoli, A. 2006. Clinical evaluation of elective laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy in dog. Iranian J. Vet. Surg. 1: 15-21.
Case, J.B., Marvel, S.J., Boscan, P. and Monnet, E.L. 2011. Surgical time and severity of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy with one, two, or three instrument cannulas. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 239: 203-208.
Cassata, G., Palumbo, V.D., Cicero, L., Damiano, G., Maenza, A., Migliazzo, A. and Monte, A.I.L. 2016. Laparotomic vs laparoscopic ovariectomy:
Comparing the two methods. The ovariectomy in the bitch in laparoscopic era. Acta Biomedica 87: 271-274.
Coisman, J.G., Case, J.B., Shih, A., Harrison, K., Isaza, N. and Ellison, G. 2014. Comparison of surgical variables in cats undergoing single incision
laparoscopic ovariectomy using a LigaSure or extracorporeal suture versus open ovariectomy. Vet. Surg. 43: 38-44.
Culp, W.T., Mayhew, P.D. and Brown, D.C. 2009. The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs. Vet. Surg. 38: 811-817.
Devitt, C.M., Cox, R.E. and Hailey, J.J. 2005. Duration, complications, stress, and pain of open ovariohysterectomy versus a simple method of
laparoscopic-assisted ovariohysterectomy in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 227: 921-927.
DeTora, M. and McCarthy, R.J. 2011. Ovariohysterectomy versus ovariectomy for elective sterilisation of female dogs and cats: Is removal of the uterus necessary. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 239: 1409-1412.
Dutta, A., Maiti, S., Pillai, A.P. and Kumar, N. 2010. Evaluation of different laparoscopic sterilisation techniques in a canine birth control program. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 34: 393-402.
Dupre, G., Fiorbianco, V., Skalicky, M., Gueltiken, N., Ay, S.S. and Findik, M. 2009. Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: comparison between single portal and two portal access. Vet. Surg. 38: 818-824.
Freeman, L.J., Rahmani, E.Y., Al-Haddad, M., Sherman, S., Chiorean, M.V., Selzer, D.J. and Constable, P.D. 2010. Comparison of pain and postoperative stress in dogs undergoing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, laparoscopic, and open oophorectomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 72: 373-380.
Gauthier, O., Holopherne-Doran, D., Gendarme, T., Chebroux, A., Thorin, C., Tainturier, D. and Bencharif, D. 2015. Assessment of postoperative
pain in cats after ovariectomy by laparoscopy, median celiotomy, or flank laparotomy. Vet. Surg. 44(S1): 23-30.
Hancock, R.B., Lanz, O.I., Waldron, D.R., Duncan, R.B., Broadstone, R.V. and Hendrix, P.K. 2005. Comparison of postoperative pain after ovariohysterectomy by harmonic scalpelassisted laparoscopy compared with median celiotomy and ligation in dogs. Vet. Surg. 34: 273-282.
Maticic, D., Stejskal, M., Pecin, M., Kreszinger, M., Pirkic, B., Vnuk, D. and Rumenjak, V. 2010. Correlation of pain assessment parameters in
dogs with cranial cruciate surgery. Veterinarski arhiv 80: 597-609.
Monnet, E. and David, C.T. 2003. Laparoscopy. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 33: 1147-1163.
Naitoh, T., Garcia-Ruiz, A., Vladisavljevic, A., Matsuno, S. and Gagner, M. 2002. Gastrointestinal transit and stress response after laparoscopic vs
conventional distal pancreatectomy in the canine model. Surg. Endosc. 16: 1627-1630.
Ohlund, M., Hoglund, O., Olsson, U. and Lagerstedt, A.S. 2011. Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: A comparison of the LigaSure™ and the SonoSurg™ systems. J. Small Anim. Pract. 52: 290-294.
Ranganath, L. and Kumar, S.S.S. 2007. Comparative studies on changes in C-reactive protein, serum cortisol, blood glucose and aspartate amino
transferase level following left flank method and laparoscopic method of ovariohysterectomy in bitches. Vet. Arh. 77: 523-529.
Sherin, S., Saikia, B., Konwar, B., Ahmed, F., Chaudhary, J., Singh, D. and Lalhmangaihzuala, M. 2019. Comparison of ovariectomy by laparoscopic and conventional open method in dogs. Int. J. Livest. Res. 9: 60-67.
Smith, J.D., Allen, S.W. adn Quandt, J.E. 1999. Changes in cortisol concentration in response to stress and postoperative pain in client-owned cats and correlation with objective clinical variables. Am. J. Vet. Res. 60: 432-436.
Stedile, R., Beck, C.A.C., Schiochet, F., Ferreira, M.P., Oliveira, S.T., Martens, F.B., Tessari, J.P., Bernades, S.B.L., Oliveira, C.S., Santos, A.P., Mello, F.P.S., Alievi, M.M. and Mucillo, M.S. 2009. Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in dogs. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 29: 653-660.
Stone, E.A. 2003. Ovary and uterus. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery, Slatter, D. (Ed), 3rd edn. Elsevier Science, New York. pp 1487-1496.
Swaffield, M.J., Molloy, S.L. and Lipscomb, V.J. 2020. Prospective comparison of perioperative wound and pain score parameters in cats undergoing flank vs midline ovariectomy. J. Feline Med. Surg. 22: 168-177.
Van Goethem, B.E., Rosenveldt, K.W. and Kirpensteijn, J. 2003. Monopolar versus bipolar electrocoagulation in canine laparoscopic ovariectomy: A non-randomised, prospective, clinical trial. Vet. Surg. 32: 464-470.
Van Nimwegen, S.A., Van Swol, C.F. and Kirpensteijn, J. 2005. Neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet surgical laser versus bipolar electrocoagulation for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs. Vet. Surg. 34: 353-357.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.