A Stochastic Frontier Production Function to Measure the Technical Efficiency of the Farmer of Apple (Malus Pumila) Production and Productivity
9 / 13
Keywords:
Technical efficiency, Stochastic frontier function (SFF), Constraints, Simple size.Abstract
This paper estimates the Technical Efficiency (T.E.) of an apple-producing farmer in Jubbal and Kotkhai tahsil of Shimla district, using a stochastic Cobb-Douglas (CD) production frontier function. A stochastic frontier production function can be used for panel data of firms. The non-negative technical inefficiency effects are assumed to function firm-specific variables and vary over time. They are believed to be independently distributed as truncations of normal distributions with constant variance. The result shows the mean technical efficiency of Jubbal and Kotkhai tahsil Farmer is 66% and 70%. The mean technical efficiency is high for Kotkhai Farmer compared to Jubbal Farmer. Therefore, it is concluded that Kotkhai’s farmers are more technically efficient than Jubbal with the same input. This suggests that Jubbal Farmer can potentially increase their productivity through more efficient use of information.
Downloads
References
Bagi, F.S. 1982. A relationship between farm size and technical efficiency in West Tennessee Agriculture. South Journal of Agricultural Economics. 14, 139-144.
Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. 1993. A Stochastic Frontier Production Function Incorporating a Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects: Working Paper in Econometrics and Applied Statistics. No 69. Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale.
Cobb, C.W. and P.H. Douglas. 1928. A theory of production. American Economic Review 18(1), 139-165.
Coelli T., Rahman S. and Thirtle C. 2002. Technical, allocative, cost and scale efficiencies in Bangladesh rice cultivation: A nonparametric approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 53, 607-626. 1 1 5.
Edeh, H.O., and Awoke, M.U. 2011. Technical Efficiency Analysis of Improved Cassava Farmers in Abakalili Local Government Area of Ebonyi State: A Stochastic Frontier Approach. AJPS, 4(2), 53‑56.
Farrell, M.J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120, pp. 253-90.
Garrett E.H., Woodworth R.S. (1969). Statistics in psychology and education. Vakils, Feffer and Simons Pvt. Ltd., Bombay, Pp. 329.
Kalirajan K. and Shand R.T. 1985. Education and agricultural productivity types: A quantitative analysis of Tamil Nadu rice farming. The Journal of Development Studies. 21, 232-243.
Kumar S. Singh K. and Tewari S.C. 1999. Problems and Constraints in Production and Marketing of High-value Crops in Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Agricultural Development and Policy, 11(2), 23-31.
Kumbhakar, S.C., Lien, G. and Hardaker, J.B. 2011. Technical Efficiency in Competing Panel Data Models: A Study of Norwegian Grain Farming. Paper Presented at the EAAE 2011 Congress: Change and Uncertainty, Challenges for Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, Aug 30 to Sept 2, 2011, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, PP. 1-12.
Nasiri, S.M. and Singh, S. 2010. A Comparative Study of Parametric and Non- Parametric Energy Use Efficiency on Paddy Production. JUST, 12(4), 391-399.
Onumah, E.E and Acquah, H.D. 2010. Frontier Analysis of Aquaculture Farms in the Southern Farms of Ghana. WSJ, 9(7), 826-835.
Oyewo, I.O. 2011. Technical Efficiency of Maize Production in Oyo State. JEFF, 3(4), 211-216.
Timmer, P., 1971, “Using a Probabilistic Frontier Production Function to Measure Technical Efficiency,” Journal of Political Economy,79, pp. 776-794.
Verma P.K. and Gupta S.P. 2008. Constraints in Production and Marketing of Summer Fruit and Vegetable Crops in Mahanadi River bed area of Raipur district. Journal of Soils and Crops, 2008, 18(2), 298‑300.
Villano, R., Mehrabi, B.H. and Fleming, E. 2010. When is Metafrontier Analysis Appropriate? An Example of Varietal Differences in Pistachio Production in Iran. JUST, 12(4), 379-389.