Artificial Neural Networks Models for the Classification of Genotypes for Rice Yield


1 / 1

Authors

  • Shavi Gupta Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology-Jammu, Jammu
  • Manish Sharma Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology-Jammu, Jammu
  • Sushil Gupta Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology-Jammu, Jammu
  • Nishant Jasrotia Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology-Jammu, Jammu
  • Bupesh Kumar Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology-Jammu, Jammu

https://doi.org/10.56093/jisas.v79i2.181858

Keywords:

Classification; Rice; Artificial Neural Network; Multilayer Perceptron; Radial basis Function; Classification ability measures.

Abstract

Artificial neural networks, or ANNs, are widely used in many scientific fields like classification, image processing, identification, and prediction. 
This research was done at the SKUAST Jammu for classification of 140 rice varieties on the basis of their yield. Classification was made in terms of 
9 morphological characters such as yield per plant, number of days for 50percent flowering, number of days for full flowering, plant height, number 
of effective tillers per plant, panicle length, grain length, grain width and ratio of grain length & grain width. The yield per plant was grouped into 
three categories and used as the response variable, while the remaining traits served as predictor variables. The rice genotypes were then classified 
according to neural networks (NN) methods Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF). The ability measures of classification 
such as Accuracy Rate, Kappa Statistics, Average Precision, Average Recall and F1 Score were used for testing samples. It is observed that RBF NN 
performed better than MLP NN for different classes of yield on the basis of classification ability measures. The variable effective number of tillers per 
plant found out to be important variable as per RBF NN whereas plant height was important variable in case of MLP NN.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen, X., Y.Xun, W.Li, and J .Zhang (2010). Combining discriminant

analysis and neuralnetworks for corn variety identification.

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 71: S48-S53.

Galdon B.R., Mendez E.M., Havel J. and Diaz C. (2010). Cluster

analysis and artificial neural networks multivariate classification

of onion Varieties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,

58(21): 11435-11440.

Gupta, S., Sharma., M., Jasrotia, N. and Mahajan, S. (2025).

Comparative analysis for classification of rice genotypes using

statistical and Artificial Neural Network models on the basis of

maturity. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications. 19(4): 1-8.

Gupta S., Sharma M., Rizvi S.E.H., Salgotra R.K., Gupta S.K.

(2023). Statistical and artificial neural network approaches for

the classification of rice genotypes based on morphological

characters. In Special proceedings society of statistics computer

and applications, 25th Annual Conference, 15–17 February 2023,

(pp. 131–137).

Harper, J.L., P.H. Lovell, and K.G. Moore (1970). The shapes and sizes

of seeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 327-356.

Jayas, D.S., J. Paliwal and N.S. Visen (2000). Multi-layer neural

networks for image analysis of agricultural products. J.

Agricultural Engineering Research. 77: 119-128.

Jasrotia, N. (2025). Scenario and Estimation of Walnut Production

through Statistical and Artificial Neural Network models. Ph.D

thesis, Sher-e- Kashmir university of Agricultural Sciences and

technology of Jammu, J&K.

Pazoki, A.R. and Z. Pazoki (2011). Classification system for rain fed

wheat grain cultivars using artificial neural network. African J.

Biotechnology. 10(41): 8031-8038.

Kumar, R. and Verma, R. (2012). Classification algorithms for data

mining: A survey.Int. J. Innov. Eng. Technol, IJIET.1(2): 7–14.

Shouche, S.P., R. Rastogi, S.G. Bhagwat, and J.K. Sainis (2001). Shape

analysis of grains of Indian wheat varieties. Computers and

Electronics in Agriculture. 33: 55-76.

Sharma M., Gupta R., Bhat A., Bhat M.I.J. and Sharma S. (2022). Price

Model for Summer and Winter Tomato Crop through Discriminant

function. Journal of Community Mobilization and sustainable

Development. Vol.1 (SSI). pp:237-245./

Downloads

Submitted

2026-07-24

Published

2026-07-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shavi Gupta, Manish Sharma, Sushil Gupta, Nishant Jasrotia, & Bupesh Kumar. (2026). Artificial Neural Networks Models for the Classification of Genotypes for Rice Yield. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 79(2), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.56093/jisas.v79i2.181858
Citation