A Pioneering Approach to Population Mean Estimation Leveraging Ranked Set Successive Sampling


0 / 0

Authors

  • Kumari Priyanka Shivaji College (University of Delhi), New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/JISAS.V80I2.8

Keywords:

Ranked Set Successive Sampling; Auxiliary variable; Mean squared error; Relative efficiency.

Abstract

Ranked set sampling has been observed to be an efficient sampling method that has gained popularity in recent years. In the present work, the 
concept of ranked set sampling has been extended to successive sampling, which results in a novel sampling scheme called Ranked Set Successive 
Sampling (RSSS). The theoretical foundation of RSSS has been discussed and estimation methodologies has been modified to be applicable in 
RSSS environment for the estimation of population mean. RSSS has been considered for two successive occasions, and the estimators are proposed 
for estimating the population mean at current (second) occasion in two-occasion RSSS. The performance of the proposed estimators are examined 
through simulation-based evaluation including the real data applications as well as simulated populations. The simulation results shows that the 
concept of RSSS is practically feasible. The comparative analysis reveals that the proposed estimators under RSSS exhibit improved efficiency over 
the available similar successive sampling estimators, which may be applicable in various real-life situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnab, R., and Olaomi, J. (2015). Improved Estimation from Ranked

Set Sampling. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics

44, 1513-1525. 10.15672/HJMS.2014438213.

Dell, T.R. and Clutter, J.L. (1972) Ranked Set Sampling Theory with

Order Statistics Background. Biometrics, 28, 545-555. https://doi.

org/10.2307/2556166

Kadilar, C., Unyazici, Y. and Cingi, H. (2009). Ratio estimator for the

population mean using ranked set sampling. Statistical Papers,

50(2), 301-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00362-007-0079-y

388

Kumari Priyanka / Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics 375–388

Kumar, A., and Sinha, R.R. (2026). Enhancing Mean Estimation

Accuracy Through Optimal Auxiliary Information in Rational

Ranked Set Sampling, J Stat Theory Pract, 20, 29. https://doi.

org/10.1007/s42519-025-00530-7

Khan, L., Shabbir, J., Ubbaid, Q., and Khan, T.F. (2024). A Refinement

of Ratio Estimation in Ranked Set Sampling and Stratified Ranked

Set Sampling Approaches, VFAST Transactions on Mathematics,

12(1), 30-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.21015/vtm.v12i1.1619

Mandowara, V.L. and Mehta, N. (2013). Efficient generalized ratio-product

type estimators for finite population mean with ranked set sampling.

Australian Journal of Statistics, 42, 137-148.

McIntyre, G.A. (1952). A Method for Unbiased Selective Sampling

Using Ranked Sets. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,

3, 385-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9520385

Patterson, H. (1950). Sampling on Successive Occasions with Partial

Replacement of Units. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:

Series B, 12, 241-255.

Priyanka, K., Trisandhya, P., and Mittal, R. (2018). Dealing sensitive

characters on successive occasions through a general class of

estimators using scrambled response techniques. Metron, 76, 2023

230.

Priyanka, K., Trisandhya, P. and Kumar, A. (2023). Evaluating the effect

of measurement error under randomized response techniques of

the sensitive variable in successive sampling. Proceedings of the

National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences,

93(4), 631644. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s40010-023-00836-w

Singh, S., and Horn, S. (1998). An alternative estimator in multi-chatracter

surveys. Metrika, 48(2), 99-107.

Singh, G.N., and Priyanka, K. (2008). Search of Good Rotation Patterns

to Improve the Precisionof Estimates at Current Occasion.

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 37(3),

337348. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920701653052

Singh, G.N. and Priyanka, K. (2010). Estimation of population mean at

current occasion in presence of several varying auxiliary variates in

two-occasion successive sampling. Statistics in Transition new series

11(1), 105-126.

Singh, G.N., Pandey, M.K., Bandyopadhyay, A., Meetei, M.Z.,

Abdullah A. Zaagan, Mahnashi, Ali M., and Al-Marzouki,

S. (2025). Estimation of Population Mean Using Calibrated

Weights in Stratified Random Successive Sampling in Presence of

Incomplete Data. Journal of Mathemat-ics, https://doi.org/10.1155/

jom/6778010

Stokes, S.L. (1980). Estimation of variance using judgment ordered

ranked set samples.Biometrics, 36, 35-42.

Takahasi, K. (1970). Practical note on estimation of population means based

on samples stratified by means of ordering. Ann Inst Stat Math, 22,

421428. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506360

Takahasi, K. and Wakimoto, K. (1968). On Unbiased Estimates of the

Population Mean Based on the Sample Stratified by Means of

Ordering.Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 20,

1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02911622

Vishwakarma, G. and Singh, A. (2022). Computing the effect of

measurement errors on ranked set sampling estimators of population

mean. Concurrency Pract Expert, 34 e733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/

cpe.7333 Yu, P.L.H. and Lam, K. (1997). Regression estimator in

ranked set sampling. Biometrics. 53, 1070-1080

Downloads

Submitted

2026-07-30

Published

2026-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kumari Priyanka. (2026). A Pioneering Approach to Population Mean Estimation Leveraging Ranked Set Successive Sampling. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 80(02), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.56093/JISAS.V80I2.8
Citation