An analysis of supply response of rapeseed-mustard in different regions of Uttar Pradesh
55 / 2
Keywords:
harvest price, short-run price elasticities, irrigated area, short run, resultsAbstract
The continuing imbalance between increasing demand and slow growth in supply of oilseeds is a major
concern which needs to be addressed seriously. The increase in the production of oilseed has to come
through increase in acreage and /or productivity of the oilseeds. Uttar Pradesh is a very important state in the
country from agricultural point of view, which occupying second position in rapeseed-mustard production. In
Uttar Pradesh, an attempt was made to examine the economic factors on supply response of rapeseed mustard
in different regions, and at aggregate level. The present study evaluated the impact of price and
selected non-price factors on the area of rapeseed-mustard, and to analyse the short and long-run price
elasticities. This macro framework study used 20 years (1989–90 to 2008–09) secondary data regarding
area, productivity, farm harvest price of crops, farm harvest price of competing crops, monsoon season
rainfall, percentage irrigated area of crops, and competing crop (gram). The double log Nerlovian lagged
adjustment model used in present study postulates that the actual acreage under a crop in each period is
adjusted in a proportion to the difference between the desired acreage in the long run equilibrium, and the
actual acreage under it in the preceding year. The short-run price elasticities of acreage are directly obtained
from logarithmic form of the model function. As the value of coefficient of adjustment usually lies between
zero and one, the value of ‘B’ close to the unity indicates that the adjustment process is very fast. When the
value of ‘B’ is close to zero, the implication is that the adjustment process is very slow to the changing prices
and other non-prices factors. If the value of ‘B’ is greater than one it would mean that the farmers over adjust
to the planned acreage. Speed of adjustment implies the number of years required to realize 95 per cent of the
price effect which was estimated using the formula suggested by Krishna, (1992). The results showed that
acreage response of rapeseed-mustard to the price of rapeseed-mustard was positive and significant in all
regions of Uttar Pradesh, except Bundelkhand region. The response to the price of competing crop (gram),
however, was positive and significant only in case of Central region. The lagged yield of rapeseed-mustard
was found to be positive and significant only in Bundelkhand region. Rainfall had strong impact on acreage
under rapeseed-mustard both at aggregate and regional levels. The percentage irrigated area showed
positive and significant impact in all regions, except the Central region. The percentage irrigated area of
competing crop gram was positive and significant only in the Central region, but it was negative and
significant at state level. Lagged area under the concerned crop was positive and significant for Western,
Central, and state as a whole. In all the cases, price as well as yield risk did not play any significant role in
acreage allocation of rapeseed-mustard, except in the Central and Bundelkhand regions where the yield risk
was positive and significant. The short run price elasticities varied from region to region. The impact of prices
was the highest in the Western and lowest in the Central region. The comparative closeness of long run
elasticity to the short run elasticity in central region revealed a greater degree of adjustment in this region.
The results of speed of adjustment showed that the farmers of Central and Bundelkhand regions would take
less number of years to realize 95% of price effect as compared to the farmers of other regions.