Changes in edible oil preference and present-day consumption status of households : A case of Tamil Nadu state, India


Abstract views: 478 / PDF downloads: 11

EDIBLE OIL PREFERENCE AND PRESENT CONSUMPTION OF HOUSEHOLDS: A CASE OF TAMIL NADU

Authors

  • G N GOVINDARAJ University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka
  • S SURYAPRAKASH University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka
  • N SIVARAMANE University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka
  • P MURALI University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka

https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v33i3.137981

Keywords:

Consumption dynamics, Edible oil, Markov chain, Tamil Nadu state

Abstract

Traditionally, in India, a variety of edible oils are used for consumption. The type of edible oil being consumed varied across regions. While one region prefers rapeseed-mustard oil, the other region enjoys peanut, sesame and coconut oils. On the whole, rapeseed and mustard oil and peanut oil are the most popularly consumed edible oils in the country. In the study state, Tamil Nadu, the foremost edible oil consumed is peanut oil besides other oils. The technological, economic and policy changes after liberalization induced drastic changes in consumer's preference for food including edible oils. The Markov Chain Analysis for rural and urban Tamil Nadu revealed that there is a perceptible shift in edible oil consumption from traditional peanut oil to Other Edible Oils (OEO's). The possible reason for these shifts are increased urbanization and changing lifestyles, increased awareness, availability of oils in loose pack form in varied quantities available even in remote areas, change in relative prices of oils, and increased income levels ofrural and urban households. The secondary data published byNational Sample SurveyOrganisation for Tamil Nadu state did not clearly disintegrate the OEO's, primary survey was employed for this study. The results based on 1000 households revealed that the dominant edible oil consumed was non-traditional sunflower oil in both rural and urban regions. The per capita consumption of edible oils was also higher in recent years indicating higher consumption demand. The results from this study affirm that peanut oil, which was traditionally consumed by households as first preference, has been replaced by non-traditional oils like sunflower oil owing to various macroeconomic factors like price, cost of cultivation and imports. The change call for more concerted efforts to supply these non-traditional oils in the future as the demand were expected to be high. Further, it also implies need for increasing the capacities of edible oil industries as the overall consumption of edible oil is increasing over years. This study highlights the need for suitable policy options for edible oil processing and marketing specifically for sunflower oil besides traditional oils and trade on edible oils.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Damodaram T and Hegde D M 2007. Oilseeds Situation in India: A Statistical Compendium. Directorate of Oilseeds Research, Hyderabad, India.

Census of India 2001. Population projections for India and states 2001-2006. In: Report of the Technical Group on Population Projections contributed by the National Commission on Population, Office of the Registrar General and Census Commission, New Delhi. http://www.educationfor allinindia.com/Population_Projection_Report_2006.pdf. Accessed on 10 July 2012.

Census of India 2011. State of Literacy. http://censusindia. gov.in/2011-prov-results/data_files/india/Final_PPT_2011_c

hapter6.pdf. Accessed on 28 August 2014.

Govindaraj G 2010. Dynamics of edible oils in Tamil Nadu: An econometric analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.

Govindaraj G and Suryaprakash S 2013. Determinants of edible oil choice by households in Tamil Nadu India. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 52: 497-514.

Govindaraj G, Suryaprakash S and Sivaramane N 2015. Household demand and supply projections of major edible oils in Tamil Nadu State, India. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 32(1): 80-86.

Hanumantharao C H 2000. Declining demand for food grains in rural India: causes and implications. Economic and Political Weekly, January 22: 201-206.

Hegde D M 2003. Vegetable oils scenario in India: past, present and future. Renewable Energy Science Series, 12: 1-17.

Kumar P 1998. Food demand and supply projections for India. Agricultural Economics Policy Paper 98-01, Indian Agricultural Research institute, New Delhi.

Mittal S 2006. Structural shift in demand for food: projections for 2020. Working Paper 184, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi. http://www.icrier.org/pdf/WP_184.pdf.Accessed on 21 January

Pingali P 2006. Westernization of Asian diets and the transformation of food systems: Implications for research and policy. Food Policy, 32: 281-298.

Pingali P and Khwaja Y 2004. Globalisation of Indian diets and the transformation of food supply systems. Paper presented at the Inaugural Keynote address to the 17th Annual conference of the Indian Society of Agricultural Marketing, Hyderabad, 5-7 February 2004. http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/ 0708/DOC15357.pdf. Accessed on 25 August 2015.

Popkin B 1999. Urbanization, lifestyle changes and the nutrition transition. World Development, 27(11): 1905-1916.

Radhakrishan R and Venkata Reddy K 2002. Food Security and Nutrition: Vision 2020. http://planningcommission.

nic.in/reports/genrep/bkpap2020/16_bg2020.pdf.Accessed on November 2014.

Ramesh P and Murugan M 2008. Edible oil consumption in India. www.ameft.com/picture/upload /file/08.pdf. Accessed on 25 July 2013.

Regmi A and Dyck J 2001. Effects of urbanization on global food demand. In: Regmi A (Ed.) Changing Structures of Global Food Consumption and Trade. ERS WRS 01-1. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC. http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/293645/ wrs 011_1_.pdf. Accessed on 2 January 2015.

Richard B K and Mathur S 2015. Integration of mustard markets in Rajasthan State of India. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 32(2): 158-166.

Shetty P S 2002. Nutrition transition in India. Public Health and Nutrition, Feb 5(1A): 175-182. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/12027282. Accessed on 2 Febuary 2014.

Singh R P 2014. Status paper on oilseeds crops. Directorate on Oilseeds Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Hyderabad. http://nmoop.gov.in/Publication/ Status_Paper.pdf. Accessed on 10 January 2014.

Sivaramane N, Singh D R and Arya P 2009. An econometric analysis of household demand for major vegetables in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 23(1): 66-76.

Sudhakarbabu S N and Hegde D M 2011. Best management practices forincreasing productivity and resource use efficiency in oilseeds. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 28(1): 1-23.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-06-19

Published

2016-10-21

How to Cite

G N GOVINDARAJ, S SURYAPRAKASH, N SIVARAMANE, & P MURALI. (2016). Changes in edible oil preference and present-day consumption status of households : A case of Tamil Nadu state, India: EDIBLE OIL PREFERENCE AND PRESENT CONSUMPTION OF HOUSEHOLDS: A CASE OF TAMIL NADU. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v33i3.137981