Variations for physical and nutritional quality traits in advanced breeding lines of groundnut
![](/public/icon/gor.png)
![](/public/icon/pdf.png)
Variations for physical and nutritional quality traits in advanced breeding lines of groundnut
Keywords:
Groundnut, Quality traits, Oil, Protein, Soluble SugarAbstract
Eighty four advanced breeding lines of groundnut were evaluated for quality traits with four checks during summer, 2019. Three genotypes, PBS 29180, PBS 29067 and PBS 29148 recorded 80.1 g, 76.3 g, and 72.6 g hundred kernel weight, respectively. Protein content was high (33.8%) in PBS 29124 followed by PBS 29082 (32.7%) and PBS 29116 (32.3%). The oil content ranged from 45.0% (PBS 29105) to 53.1 (PBS 19031). Soluble sugar content was high (6.95%) in PBS 29116. Three genotypes viz., PBS 29079B, PBS 29148 and PBS 29180 had desired combination of traits required for confectionery purpose which can be used as donor parents in breeding program or can be released as varieties after further evaluation and validation.
Downloads
References
Asibuo J Y, Akromah R, Adu-Dapaah H K, Safo-Kantanka O. 2008. Evaluation of nutritional quality of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) from Ghana. African J Food Agric Devel. 8:133–150.
Dwivedi S L and Nigam S N 1995. Breeding for improved seed quality in groundnut (A. hypogaea L.) with special reference to export promotion: issues and opportunities. In: Status of Confectionary Groundnut Research in India and Strategies for Export Promotion (Trombay).
Kona P, Mahatma M K, Gangadhara K, Narendra Kumar, Ajay B C, Rathnakumar A L, Radhakrishnan T, Dagla M C, Lokesh Kumar and Gor H.K. 2019. Confectionery traits evaluation in advanced breeding lines (ABLs) of groundnut.4th
International Conference on Advances in Agriculture & Animal Sciences towards Global Food Security Agriculture & Animal Husbandry, 58.
Mahatma M K, Thawait L K, Bishi S K, Khatediya N, Rathnakumar A L, Lalwani H B and Misra J B 2016.
Nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of Spanish and Virginia groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.): a comparative study: Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(5): 2279-2286.