EVALUATION OF ELITE SUGARCANE CLONES FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE


Abstract views: 145 / PDF downloads: 2

Authors

  • R. Gomathi Sugarcane Breeding Institute Coimbatore -641 007, Tamil Nadu, India
  • S. Vasantha Sugarcane Breeding Institute Coimbatore -641 007, Tamil Nadu, India
  • G. Hemaprabha Sugarcane Breeding Institute Coimbatore -641 007, Tamil Nadu, India
  • S. Alarmelu Sugarcane Breeding Institute Coimbatore -641 007, Tamil Nadu, India
  • R.M. Shanthi Sugarcane Breeding Institute Coimbatore -641 007, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2004-2005 crop season with seven promising midlate sugarcane varieties along with the resistant standard (Co 86032) in a strip plot design and evaluated for drought tolerance. The impact of moisture stress on various morphological characters such as plant height, leaf number, leaf area and shoot population was recorded at the termination of water stress in both normal and stressed plants. Drought treatment caused an average reduction of 27.89, 22.91, 27.43 and 17.46% in shoot population, plant height, leaf production and LAI, respectively. Co 99004 and Co 99008 transpired less water and showed relatively higher photosynthetic rate with significant improvement in growth attributes, viz. shoot population, plant height, leaf production and LAI. Yield and its parameters showed remarkable changes due to inadequate water availability during the formative phase. Water stress led to an average reduction in cane and sugar yield to the tune of 36.36% and 40.36% respectively. However, the reduction was comparatively less in Co 99004 and Co 99012 than the resistant standard (Co 86032).

References

Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Marcow I, Rodrigue SML, Ricardo CPP, Oscorio ML, Carvalloho C, Pinharo C (2002) How Plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and Growth. Ann. Bot. 89: 31-42.

Cornic G (2000). Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture not by affecting ATOP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 187-188.

Cornic C, Massacci A (1996) Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Photosynthesis and environment. Baker, N.R.(ed.). Kluwer Acad. Publishers. 347-366.

Donald CM (1968) The breeding of crop idotypes. Euphytica. 17: 385-403.

Gururaja Rao PN (1994) Adaptive response of sugarcane genotypes

to water stress. Dissertation. Madras University, India.

Gururaja Rao PN, Singh S (1989). Relationship of growth characteristics with yield and quality in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarumL.). Indian J. Plant Physiol. 32: 206-211.

Hemaprabha G, Nagarajan R, Alarmelu S (2004) Response of sugarcane genotypes to water deficit stress. Sugar Tech. 6(3): 165-168.

Hurd EA (1976) Plant breeding for drought resistance. In. (Kozlowski, T.T.ed.). Water deficit and plant growth. Academic press. New York. Pp. 317-353.

Naidu KM (1987) Potential yield in sugarcane and its realization through varietal improvement- present status and future thrusts. Sreenivasan, T.V. and Premachanadran, M.N.(eds)., Sugarcane Breeding Institute, 19-55.

Naidu KM, Venkataramana S (1989) Sugar yield and harvest index in water stressed cane varieties. Sugarcane 6: 5-7.

Sajitha B (2008) Drought responses and Osmoregulation in sugarcane: A physiological and Biochemical approach towards drought tolerance. Dissertation. Bharathiar University, India.

Sen Gupta A, Berkowitz GA, Pier PA (1989) Maintenance of photosynthesis at low leaf water potential in wheat. Plant Physiol. 89: 1358-1365.

Shih SF, Gascho GJ (1980) Relationship among stalk elongation, Leaf area and dry biomass of sugarcane. Agron. J. 72: 309-313.

Singh NB, Singh RG (1987) Growth, yield and quality of sugarcane

varieties under moisture stress. Indian. J. Plant Physiol.30:26-37.

Souza RP, Machado EC, Silva JAB, Lagoa AMM, Silveria AG (2004) Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cowpea during water stress and recovery. Env. Exp. Bot. 51: 45-56.

Vasantha S, Gururaja Rao PN, Ramanujam TR (2003) Effect of moisture stress on sucrose synthesizing enzymes in promising genotypes of sugarcane. J. Plant Bio. 30(1): 15-18.

Vasantha S, Alarmelu S, Hemeprabha G, Shanthi RM (2005) Evaluation of promising sugarcane genotypes for drought. Sugar Tech. (2& 3): 82-83.

Venkataramana S, Gururaja Rao PN, Naidu KM (1986) The effects of water stress during the formative phase on stomatal resistance and leaf water potential and its relation with yield in ten sugarcane varieties. Field Crop Res. 13: 345-355.

Venkataramana S, Shunmugasundaram S, Naidu KM (1984) Growth behavior of field grown sugarcane varieties in relation to environmental parameters and soil moisture stress. Agric. Forest. Meteorol. 31. 251-260.

Venkataramana S, Naidu KM, Sudama Singh (1987) Membrane thermostability and nitrate reductase activity in relation to water stress tolerance of young sugarcane plants. New Phytol. 107: 335-340.

Williams RF (1946) The phonology of plant growth with special reference to the concept of net assimilation rate. Ann. Bot. 10. 41-72.

Wright GC, Smith RCG, Morgan JM (1983) Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to drought stress. III. Physiological responses. Aust. Agric. Res. 34: 637-652.

Yadav RC, Prasad SR (1988) Moisture use characteristics of sugarcane genotypes under different available soil moisture regimes in alluvial entisols. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 110:5-11.

Downloads

Submitted

20-03-2020

Published

20-03-2020

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Gomathi, R., Vasantha, S., Hemaprabha, G., Alarmelu, S., & Shanthi, R. (2020). EVALUATION OF ELITE SUGARCANE CLONES FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE. Journal of Sugarcane Research, 1(1). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/JSR/article/view/99240