Conservation agriculture practices and sulphur fertilization effects on productivity and resource-use efficiency of rainfed mustard (Brassica juncea)
![](/public/icon/gor.png)
![](/public/icon/pdf.png)
Keywords:
Crop residue, Nutrient balance, oil, Sulphur, TillageAbstract
Moisture and sulphur deficiency in soil are major reasons for low productivity of mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] in rainfed semi-arid areas. To overcome this problem a field experiment was conducted during 2013-15 to find out the effect of conservation agriculture and sulphur fertilization on productivity and resource-use efficiency of mustard under rainfed conditions. Five tillage and residue management practices, i.e. conventional tillage with 0, 2 and 4 t/ha crop residue; zero tillage with 2 and 4 t/ha crop residue were allocated to main plots and four sulphur levels (0, 15, 30 and 45 kg S/ha) in sub-plots. Result showed that zero tillage with 4 t/ha crop residue produced 24.6% higher mustard seed yield than conventional tillage without residue resulted maximum net returns (44.7 × 103 ₹/ ha). Similarly, highest water use efficiency (12.7 kg/ha mm) and total nutrient uptake were also recorded in the same treatment. Increasing levels of sulphur (S) up to 45 kg/ha significantly increased seed and oil yield (37.5%). However, sulphur use efficiency was decreased with graded levels of sulphur. Conversely, higher net returns (47.6 × 103 ₹/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (1.89) were fetched with 45 kg S/ha.
Downloads
References
Baligar V C, Fagerai N K and He Z L. 2001. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 32: 921–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100104098
Choudhary M, Rana K S, Bana R S, Ghasal P C, Choudhary G L, Jakhar P and Verma R K. 2017. Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of pearl millet – mustard cropping system under conventional and conservation agriculture in rainfed semi-arid agro-ecosystem. Energy 141: 1052–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.136
Choudhary M, Rana K S, Meena M C, Bana R S, Jakhar P, Ghasal P C and Verma R K. 2019. Changes in physico-chemical and biological properties of soil under conservation agriculture based pearl millet – mustard cropping system in rainfed semi-arid region. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65: 911–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1538556
Friedrich T, Derpsch R and Kassam A. 2017. Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. In: Sustainable Development of Organic Agriculture, pp 75-90. Apple Academic Press, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315365800-4
Gupta A K and Jain N K. 2008. Sulphur fertilization in a pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)-Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) cropping system. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 54: 533–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340802280435
Jackson M.L.1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.
Jakhar P, Rana K S, Dass A, Choudhary A K, Choudhary M, Adhikary P P and Maharana J. 2018. Resource conservation practices in maize-mustard cropping system: Impact on energy, soil carbon and nutrient dynamics. Journal of Environmental Biology 39: 440–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/39/4/MRN-549
Jamal A, Moon Y S and Abdin M Z. 2010. Sulphur -a general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4: 523–29.
Jat M L, Chakraborty D, Ladha J K, Rana D S, Gathala M K, McDonald A and Gerard B. 2020. Conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification in South Asia. Nature Sustainability 3: 336–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0500-2
Messick D L. 2014. World Sulphur Outlook. Available from: http://www.firt.org/sites/default/files/DonMessick_Sulphur_Outlook. pdf
Omidi, H, Tahmasebi Z, Naghdi Badi H A, Torabi H and Miransari M. 2010. Fatty acid composition of canola (Brassica napus L.) as affected by agronomical, genotypic and environmental parameters, Comptes Rendus Biologies 333: 248–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2009.10.001
Pradhan A, Chan C, Roul P K, Halbrendt J and Sipes B. 2018. Potential of conservation agriculture (CA) for climate change adaptation and food security under rainfed uplands of India: A transdisciplinary approach. Agricultural Systems 163: 27–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.002
Prasad R and Shivay Y S. 2018. Sulphur in soil, plant and human nutrition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 88: 429–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-016-0769-0
Ranaivoson L, Naudin K, Ripoche A, Affholder F, Rabeharisoa L and Corbeels M. 2017. Agro-ecological functions of crop residues under conservation agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37: 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0432-z
Rego T J, Sahrawat K L, Wani S P and Pardhasaradhi G. 2007. Widespread deficiencies of sulfur, boron, and zinc in Indian semi-arid tropical soils: On-farm crop responses. Journal of Plant Nutrition 30: 1569–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160701615475
Valbuena D, Erenstein O, Tui S H K, Abdoulaye T, Claessens L, Duncan A J, Gérard B, Rufino MC, Teufel N, van Rooyen A and van Wijk M T. 2012. Conservation Agriculture in mixed crop–livestock systems: Scoping crop residue trade-offs in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Field Crops Research 132: 175–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.022
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.