Wider area validation and economic analysis of adaptable IPM technology in bell pepper (Capsicum annum)


Abstract views: 115 / PDF downloads: 48

Authors

  • H R SARDANA National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Pusa campus, New Delhi 110012
  • M N BHAT National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Pusa campus, New Delhi 110012
  • MUKESH SEHGAL National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Pusa campus, New Delhi 110012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i2.15300

Keywords:

henopodium album, Correlation, Genetic advance, Germplasm, Heritability, Path co-efficient analysis

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in bell pepper (Capsicum annum var. frutescens L.) during 2007–10 at Daha-Jagir, Karnal, Haryana with a view to study the validation and economic viability of adaptable IPM technology in a farmers’ participatory approach. The IPM technology for bell pepper crop comprising raising healthy nursery using soil solarization and mixing of Trichoderma harzianum (c.f.u. 2 × 109) along with FYM (@ 10 g/ 100 g FYM/m2); seedling dip in Pseudomonas fluorescence, installation of delta traps @ 2/acre, one or two sprays of neem (Neem Baan @ 10 ml/litre) against aphids in early stages, erection of pheromone traps @ 5/ha, application of spinosad 45 SC @ (75 g ai/ha or 0.5 ml/litre) for thrips, collection and destruction of borers and disease affected fruits, five releases of egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis based on pheromone monitoring, two sprays of HaNPV 250 LE/ha in evenings with UV protectant, one spray of ecofriendly emmamectin benzoate 5 WDG @ 0.25 g/lit of water, two to three need based sprays of chemical pesticides like indoxacarb 14.5 SP @ 500 g ai/ha or rynaxpyr 18.5 SC @ 3.5 ml /litre of water and carbendazim + mancozeb 75 SP @ 0.2% etc. was very effective in reducing the incidence of pests and minimizing the yield losses. The adoption of IPM technology resulted in reducing the number of chemical  sprays to 4–5 from 12–14 in non-IPM fields with higher fruit yields of 14.07–24.35 and 21.63 tonnes/ha in IPM and 12.20, 15.58 and 18.0 tonnes/ha in non-IPM fields and with higher CBR of 1:1.99, 1:3.29 and 1:2.81 in IPM than 1:1.48, 1:1.70 and 1:2.30 in non-IPM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chakraborti S. 2001. Neem based integrated schedule for the control of vectors causing apical leaf curling in chilli. Pest Management and Economic Zoology 8: 79–84.

George S. 2006. ‘Role of vermicompost, vermiwash and other organics in the management of thrips and mites in chilli’. MSc Ag thesis, University of Agricultural Science, Dharwad, Karnataka.

Krishna Kumar N K. 1995. Yield loss in chilli and sweet pepper due to Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystem 1: 61–9.

Krishna Kumar N K and Srinivasan K. 1994. Pest management in solanaceous crop. Annual Report 1994–95, 55pp. IIHR, Bangalore.

Krishna Kumar N K, Aradhya M, Deshpande A A, Anand N and Ramachandar P R. 1996. Screening of chilli and sweet pepper germplasm for resistance to chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood. Euphytica 89: 319–24.

Sardana H R and Sehgal Mukesh 2008. Integrated pest management strategies for bell pepper. Extension folder. National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi.

Sorensen K A. 2005. Vegetable insect pest management. www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts//ent/notes/Vegetables/veg37.html-11k

Sunitha T R. 2007. ‘Insect pests of Capsicum annum var. frutescense and their management’. MSC thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka.

Varghese T S and Giraddi R S. 2005. Integration of neem cake in the plant protection schedule for thrips and mite management in chilli (cv. Byadagi). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciencies 154–6.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-02-07

Published

2012-02-07

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

SARDANA, H. R., BHAT, M. N., & SEHGAL, M. (2012). Wider area validation and economic analysis of adaptable IPM technology in bell pepper (Capsicum annum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(2), 186–9. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i2.15300
Citation