Managing Higher Vertebrate Pest Problem in Indian Agriculture: Time to Rethink

OPINION PAPER


58 / 35

Authors

  • Vipin Chaudhary Principal Scientist and In-Charge, All India Network Project (AINP) on Vertebrate Pest Management, ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v64i3.168758

Abstract

Indian agriculture is facing growing challenge from the higher vertebrate pests as they cause widespread damage to agricultural crops and thereby affect the food security of the country. Crop raiding by different wild animals particularly, Monkeys (Macaca sp.); Hanuman langur (Presbytis entellus), Elephant (Elephas maximus), Blue bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus), Sambar deer (Cervus unicolor), Black buck (Antilope cervicapra), Chinkara (Gazellaga zellabennetti), Wild boar (Sus scrofa), peacock/parakeets, porcupine (Hystrix indica) etc. has been widely reported from all over the country (Agrawal et al., 2016). Wild boars and nilgai are responsible for large scale crop damages annually in some states like Bihar, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh (Manral et al., 2016). Despite having tremendous impact on agricultural productivity and rural livelihoods, their management is still constraint by legal, socio-cultural, weak institutional coordination, and a lack of effective, science-based interventions. This article highlights the current management strategies, identifies the critical constraints and presents the acceptable solutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrawal, P. K., Verghese, A, Krishna, S. R., Subaharan, K. 2016. Human Animal Conflict in Agro-Pastoral Context: Issues & Policies. Publisher Indian Council of Agricultural Research New Delhi. Pp56.

Anwar, R., Saralch, H.S., Kumar, A. 2015. Human-Wildlife Conflict: Issues Versus Mitigation. Indian Forester 141 (12): 1305-1314.

Baishya, A., Rao, T.K.S., Singh, A. K., Parmer, A. 2025. Human-Wildlife Conflict and Management with Special Reference to India. Annual Research & Review in Biology 40(5): 133-144.

Barua, M., Bhagwat, S. A., & Jadhav, S. 2013. The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biological Conservation 157: 309–316.

Chauhan, N.P.S., Singh R. 1990. Crop damage by over-abundant populations of nilgai and blackbuck in Haryana (India) and its management. Proc. Vertebrate Pest Control Conference, Red Lion Inn, Sacramento, California, U.S.A., pp. 218-220.

Chhangani, A. K., Mohnot, S. M. 2004. Crop raid by hanuman langur Semnopithecus entellus in and around Aravallis, (India) and its management. Primate Report, 6(9): 35–47.

Manral, U., Sengupta, S., Hussain, S. A., Rana, S., Badola, R. 2016. Human Wildlife Conflict in India: A Review of Economic Implication of Loss and Preventive Measures. Indian Forester 142 (10): 928-940.

MoEFCC. (2016). Notification under Section 62 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 – Declaration of certain wild animals as vermin. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India.

Reddy, G.V., Singh, A., Sharma, S. 2017. Human–wildlife conflict and compensation schemes: A case study from India. Journal of Wildlife Research 9(1), 35–42.

Reddy, P. A., Charoo, S. A. 2016. Wildlife conflict mitigation in India: Policy, management, and research. ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife & Protected Areas 18(1), 11–20.

Reddy, P., Singh, A., Sharma, S. 2021. Community perspectives in mitigating wild animal conflict in India. Journal of Wildlife and Ecology 9(2), 17–26.

Sekhar, N. U. 1998. Crop and livestock depredation caused by wild animals in protected areas: The case of Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan. Environmental Conservation 25(2): 160–171.

Sukumar, R. (2006). A brief review of the status, distribution and biology of wild Asian elephants Elephas maximus. International Zoo Yearbook 40: 1–8.

Downloads

Submitted

08-07-2025

Published

01-10-2025

How to Cite

Chaudhary, V. (2025). Managing Higher Vertebrate Pest Problem in Indian Agriculture: Time to Rethink: OPINION PAPER. Annals of Arid Zone, 64(3), 309-312. https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v64i3.168758
Citation