Characteristic Analysis of Commercial Wound Dressings


256 / 3

Authors

  • G. KRISHNA PRASAD Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019
  • A. S. M. RAJA Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019
  • T. SENTHILKUMAR Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019
  • N. VIGNESHWARAN Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019
  • P. G. PATIL Director, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019

Keywords:

Wound, Absorbency, Dehydration, Gauze and Cotton

Abstract

In the current decade, the use of textile-based high-performance wound dressing is growing due to the demand for quick healing from the trauma, in-situ drug delivery and other functional requirements. Today different types of wound dressing materials are manufactured for different types of dressing i.e. primary, secondary, occlusive and semi-occlusive dressing. In this study, most commonly available wound dressings were evaluated and compared in vitro. Standard test methods were employed during the study to determine the absorbency, dehydration rate, mass loss (%) of dressing. It was found that the cotton non-woven based wound dressing had better absorbency than the synthetic or foam-based dressings.

References

Baranoski, S., Ayello, E. (2003) – Wound Care Essentials: Practice Principles. New York, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

BS EN 12127 (1998) –Textiles Fabrics Determination of mass per unit area using small samples, ISBN 0 580 29132 4, British Standard Institute.

BS EN 13726 (2002) – Test methods for primary wound dressings – Part 1: Aspects of absorbency, ISBN 0 580 39510 3, British Standard Institute.

Hanson, C. (1997) – Interactive wound dressings. A practical guide to their use in older patients – Drugs Aging, 11:271–284.

Moffatt, C.J., Franks, P.J., Hollinworth, H. (2002) – Understanding wound pain and trauma: an international perspective. EWMA Position Document: Pain at wound dressing changes.

Parsons, D., Bowler, P.G., Myles, V., Jones, S. (2005) – Silver antimicrobial dressings in wound management: a comparison of antibacterial, physical, and chemical characteristics – Wounds, 17(8): 222–32.

Rajendran, S. (2009) – Advanced textiles for wound care, Woodhead Publishing in Textiles.

Selvaraj Dhivya., Viswanadha Vijaya Padma., Elango Santhini. (2015) – Wound dressings – a review ­– BioMedicine, 5(4): 24-28.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-08-17

Published

2021-08-17

How to Cite

KRISHNA PRASAD, G., RAJA, A. S. M., SENTHILKUMAR, T., VIGNESHWARAN, N., & PATIL, P. G. (2021). Characteristic Analysis of Commercial Wound Dressings. Cotton Research Journal, 9(1&2). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/CoRJ/article/view/114066