The chemical characteristics, In-vitro digestibility and Rumen fermentation of durum and bread wheat straw varieties as potential feed for ruminants
17 / 1
Abstract
Wheat straw is one of the abundant agricultural residues used on large scale for ruminant fodder. To supply farmers with high-quality straws, the current study was carried out to evaluate durum and bread wheat straw varieties with regard to their chemical composition, in vitro digestibility, and rumen fermentation parameters. The samples were subjected to the estimation of protein, total ash, crude fiber, and fiber fractions. The mineral content was analyzed by using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. In vitro digestibility and rumen fermentation parameters were also assessed using standard methods. Results showed that HI-8759, a bio-fortified durum variety released for the central zone, has significantly higher CP than HI-8713 and less NDF, ADF, and cellulose compared to HI-8713, HI-8737, and HI-8663. HI 8777, another bio-fortified durum wheat variety found for the peninsular zone, contains higher IVDMD and IVOMD than UAS 428. Similarly, WB 02, a bio-fortified bread wheat variety has higher CP levels than HI 1633 and HI 1605. Furthermore it contains more IVDMD, IVOMD, and ME than HI 1544. Overall, the cellulose content is higher (P<0.01) in durum compared to bread wheat straw. In vitro digestibility revealed that durum wheat straw varieties have significantly higher TGP, IVDMD, IVOMD, and ME than bread wheat varieties, indicating that durum wheat is more digestible. 1000 grain weight is positively correlated to straw NDF, cellulose, total gas production, ME, acetate, propionate, butyrate and TVFA concentrations. As a result, bio-fortified straw is an important livestock feeding.
Downloads
References
Ali, N. and Singh, M. 2003. ‘In sacco nutritional evaluation of wheat straw varieties’, Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 3, 67–74.
Álvarez, C., Mullen, A.M., Pojić, M., Dapčević Hadnađev, T.D. and Papageorgiou, M. 2021. ‘Classification and target compounds’, in Charis, M. and Galanakis, E. (eds.) Food waste recovery – processing technologies, industrial techniques, and applications. Academic Press, 21–49. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-820563-1.00024-X.
AOAC International. 2012. Official methods of analysis. 19th edn. Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Biradar, S.S., Naik, R.V., Hanchinal, R.R., Patil, B.N., Kalappanavar, I.K. and Desai, S.A. 2012. ‘A high yielding durum wheat variety UAS 428 released for cultivation to areas of Peninsular India’, Green Farming, 6(3), 580–582.
Chatrath, R., Tiwari, V., Gupta, V., Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., Mishra, C.N., Venkatesh, K., Saharan, M.S., Singh, G., Tyagi, B.S., Tiwari, R., Sharma, I., Prakash, O. and Singh, G.P. 2018. ‘WB 2: A high yielding bread wheat variety for irrigated timely sown conditions of North Western Plains Zone of India’, Wheat and Barley Research, 10(1), 40–44.
Cottyn, B.G. and Boucque, C.V. 1968. ‘Rapid method for the gas chromatographic determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid’, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 16, 105–107.
Dai, J., Bean, B., Brown, B., Bruening, W., Edwards, J., Flowers, M., Karow, R., Lee, C., Morgan, G., Ottman, M., Ransom, J. and Wiersma, J. 2016. ‘Harvest index and straw yield of five classes of wheat’, Biomass and Bioenergy, 85, 223–227. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.023.
Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. 2022. Agricultural statistics at a glance, 2022. Wheat: Area, production and yield during 2020–21. Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, 53.
Divya, A., Prasad, S.V.S., Singh, J.B., Phuke, R.M., Singh, A.K., Sharma, K.C. and Upendra, S. 2022. ‘Pusa Mangal (HI8713): A durum wheat variety boosting economy and nutritional security of central zone wheat farmers’, Indian Farming, 2–5.
Giridhar, K. and Anandan, S. 2013. ‘Remote sensing techniques for estimation of crop residues and biomass from grasslands’, in Sampath, K.T., Ghosh, J. and Bhatta, R. (eds.) Animal nutrition & reproductive physiology (recent concepts). Delhi: Satish Serial Publishing House, 547–556.
Joshi, A.K., Kumar, U., Mishra, V.K., Chand, R., Chatrath, R., Naik, R., Biradar, S., Singh, P.R., Budhlakoti, N., Devulapalli, R. and Blümmel, M. 2019. ‘Variations in straw fodder quality and grain–straw relationships in a mapping population of 287 diverse spring wheat lines’, Field Crops Research, 243, 107627.
Keno, M.T., Tolemariam, T., Demeke, S., Wamatu, J., Alkhtib, A. and Janssens, G.P.J. 2021. ‘Effect of barley variety on feed intake, digestibility, body weight gain and carcass characteristics in fattening lambs’, Animals (Basel), 11(6), 1773.
Mann, D.L., Goode, L. and Pond, K.R. 1987. ‘Voluntary intake, gain, digestibility, rate of passage and gastro-intestinal tract fill in tropical and temperate breeds of sheep’, Journal of Animal Science, 64, 880–886.
Menke, K.H. and Steingass, H. 1988. ‘Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid’, Animal Research and Development, 28, 7–55.
Pandey, H.N., Bhawsar, R.C., Samdur, M.Y., Prasad, S.V.S., Mishra, A.N., Varma, P.K., Singh, A.K. and Kantwa, S.R. 2008. ‘Notification of bread wheat variety HI 1544 (Purna)’, Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 68–225.
Patil, D.T., Kanaujia, J.K., Todwal, S. and Kushwaha, D.S. 2020. ‘Assessment of wheat variety HI-1605 under limited irrigation conditions in Sehore District of Madhya Pradesh’, Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 9, 16–20.
Prasad, S.V.S. and Prakasha, T.L. 2020. ‘Wheat varieties identified for release’, Madhya Bharat Wheat News, 6(2), 1–9.
Rao, S.B.N., Suman, K., Chirravuri, C.N., Sundaram, R.M., Nalina, M., Chandrasekharaiah, M., Parthipan, S. and Soren, N.M. 2022. ‘Nutritional evaluation of different rice (Oryza sativa) straw of bio-fortified varieties, bio-fortified breeding lines and breeding lines’, Indian Journal of Animal Science, 92, 390–393.
Schiere, J.B., Joshi, A.L., Seetharam, A., Oosting, S.J., Goodchild, A.V., Deinum, B. and Van Keulen, H. 2004. ‘Review paper: Grain and straw for whole plant value, implications for crop management and genetic improvement strategies’, Experimental Agriculture, 40, 277–294.
Sohane, R.K. and Singh, M. 2000. ‘Genetic variability and prediction of nutritive value of rice straw of different cultivars’, Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 17, 271–278.
Vadiveloo, J. 1992. ‘Varietal differences in the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of rice straw’, Journal of Agricultural Science, 119(1), 27–33. doi:10.1017/S0021859600071513.
Van Soest, P.J. 2006. ‘Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality – Review’, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 130, 137–171.
Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. 1991. ‘Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition’, Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597.
Vaswani, S., Kumar, R., Roy, D. and Kumar, M. 2013. ‘In vitro evaluation of wheat straw varieties for chemical composition, gas production and digestibility’, Indian Journal of Animal Research, 47, 555–557.
Wang, X., Zengling, Y., Yang, Z., Liu, X., Huang, G., Xiao, W. and Han, L. 2020. ‘The composition characteristics of different crop straw types and their multivariate analysis and comparison’, Waste Management, 110, 87–97. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.018.
Additional Files
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright remains with the society and author jointly. However, material can be used for research, teaching and to achieve goals of the society.