Stability analysis under diverse environments of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) genotypes by AMMI model


362 / 227

Authors

  • PREETI YADAV CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India
  • S K TEHLAN CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India
  • MANOJ KUMAR N CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i3.101464

Keywords:

AMMI, Biplot, Environment, Fenugreek

Abstract

Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) is one of the most important seed spices crop in the world. India being one of the largest fenugreek producing country, has released many varieties, but within few years of release, many of these are no longer under cultivation owing to inconsistent performance in diverse environments, however, some of the varieties which depicted stable performance are under cultivation. This study aimed to evaluate the adaptability and yield stability of different fenugreek genotypes using AMMI model. Total 60 elite fenugreek genotypes were evaluated under six environments during rabi 2015–16 and 2016–17 seasons at Vegetable Research Farm, CCS HAU, Hisar. AMMI model was employed to assess the magnitude of genotype × environment (GE) interaction and stability of genotypes across environments. Analysis of variance for seed yield clearly indicates that the mean sum of square for genotypes is significant, suggesting broad range of diversity among the genotypes. The environmental variances are highly significant for most of the characters. G × E mean sum of square was significant for seed yield (q/ha) which indicates that the performance of genotypes that was differential over the environments. The proportion of sum of square for G × E interaction for seed yield was 80.94%. The genotype, viz. JFg 240, HM 346, HM 258, NDM 20, NDM 13 and RM 28 exhibited stable performance over all environments for seed yield. The environments E4 (4 Nov 2016), E3 (28 Nov, 2015) and E2 (15 Nov, 2015) were the main contributors to the phenotypic stability of the genotypes and E2 and E5 are the favourable environments for obtaining higher seed yield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balapure M M, Mhase L B, Kute N S and Pawar V Y. 2016. AMMI analysis for stability of chickpea. Legume Research 39(2): 301–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9432

Brandiej E and Meverty B E. 1994. Genotype × environmental interaction and stability of seed yield of oil rapeseed. Crop Science 18: 344–53.

Crossa J, Gauch H G and Zobel R W. 1990.Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of two international maize cultivar trials.Crop Science 30: 493–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030003x

Darai R, Sarker A, Sah R P, Pokhrel K and Chaudhary R.2017. AMMI biplot analysis for genotype × environment interaction on yield trait of high Fe content lentil genotypes in Terai and mid-hill environment of Nepal. Annals of Agricultural & Crop Sciences 2(1): 1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26420/annagriccropsci.2017.1026

Duarte J B and Vencovsky R. 1999. Genotype × environment interaction: an introduction to AMMI analysis = Interaçãogenótipos × ambientes: umaintrodução à análise AMMI. SociedadeBrasileira de Genética, RibeirãoPreto, SP, Brazil (in Portuguese). 60p.

Ebdon J S and Gauch H G. 2002. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance Trials: II. Cultivar recommendations. Crop Science 42: 497–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.4970

Eberhart S A and Russell W A. 1966.Stability parameters for comparing varieties.Crop Science 6: 36-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x

Heidari Shadi, Azizineahad Reza and Haghparast Reza. 2016. Yield stability analysis in advanced durum wheat genotypes by using AMMI and GE biplot models under diverse environment. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding76(3): 274–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2016.00042.0

Meena M R, Karuppiayan R, Ram Bakshi, Kumar Ravinder and Kulshreshtha N. 2017. Genotypes × environment interactions and stability analysis of sugarcane clones (Saccharum spp.) by AMMI model in sub-tropical regions of India. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 77(4): 540–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2017.00071.2

Meena Kumar Suresh, Sastry Divakara E V, Rajput S S and Pandey Yogesh. 2015. Stability of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes for terminal heat and water stress. Legume Research 38(5): 589–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v38i5.5934

Purchase J L, Hatting H, and Van Deventer C S. 2000. Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 17:101–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2000.10634878

Samonte S O P, Wilson L T, McClung A M and Medley J C. 2005.Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Crop Science 45: 2414–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0627

Yan W, Hunt L A, Sheng Q and Szlavnics Z. 2000.Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40: 597–605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x

Zobel R W, Wright M J and Gauch H G. 1988.Statistical analysis of yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80: 388–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x

Downloads

Submitted

2020-06-22

Published

2020-06-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

YADAV, P., TEHLAN, S. K., & N, M. K. (2020). Stability analysis under diverse environments of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) genotypes by AMMI model. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(3), 528-532. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i3.101464
Citation