Robust method of estimating of odd ratios in case-control association studies
246 / 211
Keywords:
Case-Control Study, Preliminary Test Estimator, Prospective Approach, Retrospective Approach, Single Nucleotide PolymorphismsAbstract
In case-control studies, association of a disease with a genetic trait can be studied in terms of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP). Prospective and retrospective likelihoods are the two common approaches used to study this association. In this paper, a method based on Preliminary test, has been proposed, which is efficient than prospective approach by exploiting model assumptions of Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) and robust against failure of model assumptions as compared to retrospective approach (2015-16). In this proposed approach, a Preliminary Test Estimator (PTE) has been suggested based on both prospective and retrospective approach for estimating of association of a disease with genetic marker. The proposed PTE has been empirically evaluated through a simulation study. The Preliminary Test Estimator developed was found to be robust against the deviation from HWE.
Downloads
References
Andersen E B. 1970. Asymptotic Properties of Conditional Maximum-Likelihood Estimators. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B 32: 283–01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00842.x
Chatterjee N, Chen Y, Luo S and Carroll R J. 2009. Analysis of Case-Control Association Studies: SNPs, Imputation and Haplotypes. Statistical Science 24(4): 489–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS297
Chatterjee N and Carroll R J. 2005. Semiparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Case-Control Studies of Gene- Environment Interactions. Biometrika 92: 399–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/92.2.399
Chen J and Chatterjee N. 2007. Exploiting Hardy– Weinberg equilibrium for efficient screening of single SNP associations from case-control studies. Human Heredity 63: 196–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000099996
Chen Y H, Chatterjee N and Carroll R J. 2009. Shrinkage estimators for robust and efficient inference in haplotype-based casecontrol studies. Journal of American Statistical Association 104: 220–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.0104
Das G and Bez K. 1995. Preliminary Test Estimators in Double Sampling with Two Auxiliary Variables. Communication in Statistics: Theory and Methods 24(5): 1211–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929508831548
Epstein M P and Satten G A. 2003. Inference on haplotype effects in case-control studies using unphased genotype data. American Journal of Human Genetics 73: 1316–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/380204
Han C P and Bancroft T A. 1968. On Pooling Means when Variance is Unknown. Journal of American Statistical Association 62: 1333–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480931
Luo S, Mukherjee B, Chen J and Chatterjee N. 2009. Shrinkage estimation for robust and efficient screening of single-SNP association from case-control genome-wide association studies. Genetic Epidemiology 33(8): 740–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20428
Mukherjee B and Chatterjee N. 2008. Exploiting gene–environment independence for analysis of case-control studies: An empirical Bayes approach to trade-off between bias and efficiency. Biometrics 64: 685–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00953.x
Prentice R L and Pyke R. 1979. Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Biometrika 66: 403–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/66.3.403
Rai A and Srivastava A K. 1998. Estimation of regression coefficient from survey data based on test of significance. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 27(3): 761–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929808832125
Satten G A and Epstein M P. 2004. Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Methods for Haplotype Inference in Case- Control Studies. Genetic Epidemiology 27: 192–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20020
Spinka C, Carroll R J and Chatterjee N. 2005. Analysis of casecontrol studies of genetic and environmental factors with missing genetic information and haplotype-phase ambiguity. Genetic Epidemiology 29: 108–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20085
Sukhatme B V and Tang V K T. 1975. Allocation in Stratified Sampling Subsequent to Preliminary Test of Significance. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 176–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1975.10480282
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.