Evaluation of new yellow maize (Zea mays) inbred lines using line × tester analysis


292 / 223

Authors

  • Mohammad Reda Ismail Field Crop Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt
  • Tamer Talat El-Mouslhy Field Crop Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i3.101500

Keywords:

Broad genetic base, Combining ability, Line × tester, Topcrosses, Zea mays

Abstract

This study evaluated 20 elite yellow maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines which were crossed as female parents with three different testers as male parents, i.e. Gem. Pop. (Broad genetic base), Single cross 101 and Inbred line 100 represent (Narrow genetic base) at the Experiment Research Station of Moshtohor, Benha University, Egypt during 2014 summer. The resulting 60 top crosses with three commercial check hybrids i.e. SC.155, SC. Pioneer 3080 and TWC.352 were evaluated in a yield trail in two sowing dates during 2015 growing summer season. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was used. The data were recorded on days to anthesis (AD), maturity date (MD), leaf area of upper ear (LA), ear length (EL) and grain yield per feddan (GYPF). The results showed that, sowing dates, crosses, lines, testers except for (MD) and line × testers mean squares were significant for all traits. The parental inbred lines (L-4, L-5, L-10, L-12, L-13, L-14 and L-19) possessed high GCA effects for grain yield and (L-6, L-7, L-10 and L-11) possessed high GCA effects for earliness. These lines could be utilized as promising inbred lines in a hybridization programme to develop high yielding and early maturity maize hybrids. The seven crosses (T-1×L-7, T-1×L-13, T-1×L-17, T-2×L-4, T-2×L-5, T-2×L-10 and T-2× L-12) which had out-yielded significantly the best check SC.3080 could be utilized for future breeding work as well as for direct release after confirming the stability of their performances observed in the current study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Davis R L. 1927. Report of the plant breeding. Annual Report, Puerto Rico agricultural experiment station, pp 14–15.

El-Ghonemy M A M. 2015. Combining ability of new yellow maize inbred lines using top cross method. Egypt Journal of Plant Breeding 19(3): 903–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0031568

El-Hosary A A and El-Badawy M El M. 2005. Heterosis and combining ability in yellow corn (Zea mays L.) under two nitrogen levels. The 11th Conf. Agronomy, Agronomy Department, Faculty Agriculture, Assiut University, 89–99.

El-Hosary A A, El-Badawy M El M and Abdel-Tawab Y M. 2006. Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single cross performance using RABD and SSR markers. Egypt Journal Genetics and Cytology 35: 209–24.

Gamea H A A. 2015. Estimate of combining ability of new yellow maize inbred lines using top crosses. Egypt Journal Agricultural Research 93(2): 287–98.

Hassan M A A, El-Shenawy A A, Abo El-Haress S M and Khalil M A G. 2016. Combining ability of new yellow maize inbred lines for earliness and grain yield. Egypt Journal of Plant Breeding 20(2): 353–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0031708

Ismail M R, Abd El-Latif MS and Abd-Elaziz M A A. 2018. Combining ability analysis for some top crosses of white maize. Egypt Journal of Plant Breeding 22(5): 1003–13.

Jenkins M T. 1935. The effect of inbreeding and selection within inbred lines of maize upon the hybrids made after successive generations of selfing. Iowa State Journal of Science 3: 429–50.

Kempthorne O. 1957. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., NY, USA.

Mahmoud A A and Abd El-Azeem M E. 2004. Estimates of general and specific combining ability of some yellow maize inbred lines using top-crosses. Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor, Zagazig University 42: 427–37.

Nawar A A, El-Shamarka S A, El-Absawy E A, Ibrahim M E and Shehata M A. 1998. Estimation of genetic variation in maize population and their interaction with growing season. Minufiya Journal Agricultural Research 23(6): 1509–30.

Sprague G F. 1939. An estimation of the number of top crossed plants required for adequate representation of corn variety. Journal of American Society of Agronomy 38: 11–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1939.00021962003100010002x

Sprague G F and Tatum L A. 1942. General versus specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Journal of American Society of Agronomy 34: 923–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1942.00021962003400100008x

Steel R G and Torrie J. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA.

Downloads

Submitted

2020-06-22

Published

2020-06-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ismail, M. R., & El-Mouslhy, T. T. (2020). Evaluation of new yellow maize (Zea mays) inbred lines using line × tester analysis. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(3), 621-624. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i3.101500
Citation