Gains from Improved Technology Adoption in Disadvantaged Regions: Evidences from Bundelkhand Region


Abstract views: 149 / PDF downloads: 95 / PDF downloads: 40

Authors

  • RAKA SAXENA ICAR-NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY RESEARCH
  • VINITA KANWAL ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • MOHDARSHAD KHAN ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP), New Delhi
  • SUMAN VERMA ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP), New Delhi
  • GURURAJ B ICAR-NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY RESEARCH

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i6.101951

Keywords:

Technology adoption, High-yielding Varieties, Micro-irrigation Mechanisation, Bundelkhand

Abstract

The study explored the status and determinants of technology adoption in terms of shifting towards high yielding
varieties, micro-irrigation and mechanisation in Bundelkhand zone. The study is based on a field survey conducted
in the Jhansi district of Bundelkhand region in 2018–19. Bundelkhand is a water scarce area of the country and
needs policy interventions in the form of efficient water utilization and enhanced production. The results indicate
that despite least adoption of sprinkler in the region, micro-irrigation has resulted in water use conservation and
improved yields in comparison to conventional irrigation method. The findings revealed that age, income from
cultivation, possession of MGNREGA job card and membership of any local and village level organization had a
considerable impact on the decision to adopt improved agricultural varieties and micro-irrigation implying that the
security nets provided in any form motivates the households to adopt improved technology. Size of operated land,
income from non-agricultural activities and possession of Kisan Credit Card are the significant factors in case of
farm mechanisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Omran A M, Sheta A S, Falatah A M and Al-Harbi A R. 2005. Effect of drip irrigation on squash (Cucurbita pepo) yield and water-use efficiency in sandy calcareous soils amended with clay deposits. Agricultural Water Management 73(1): 43–55. 27

Asfaw S, Shiferaw B, Simtowe F and Lipper L. 2012. Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Food Policy 37(3): 283–95.

Awotide B A, Karimov A A and Diagne A. 2016. Agricultural technology adoption, commercialization and smallholder rice farmers’ welfare in rural Nigeria. Agricultural and Food Economics 4(1): 1–24.

Brookes G and Barfoot P. 2018. Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996–2016. GM Crops & Food 9(2): 59–89.

Çetin Ö and Uygan D. 2008. The effect of drip line spacing, irrigation regimes and planting geometries of tomato on yield, irrigation water use efficiency and net return. Agricultural Water Management 95(8): 949–58.

Chandran K M and Surendran U. 2016. Study on factors influencing the adoption of drip irrigation by farmers in humid tropical Kerala, India. International Journal of Plant Production 10(3): 347–64.

Duflo E, Kremer M and Robinson J. 2011.Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. American Economic Review 101(6): 2350–90.

El-Hendawy S E, El-Lattief E A A, Ahmed M S and Schmidhalter U. 2008. Irrigation rate and plant density effects on yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated corn. Agricultural Water Management 95(7): 836–44.

Fernandez-Cornejo J, Hendricks C and Mishra A. 2005. Technology adoption and off-farm household income: The case of herbicide-tolerant soybeans. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37(3):549–63.

Hailu B K, Abrha B K and Weldegiorgis K A. 2014. Adoption and impact of agricultural technologies on farm income: Evidence from Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics 2(1128–2016–92058): 91–106.

Matuschke I, Mishra R R and Qaim M. 2007.Adoption and impact of hybrid wheat in India. World Development 35(8): 1422–35.

Mendola M. 2007. Agricultural technology adoption and poverty reduction: A propensity-score matching analysis for rural Bangladesh. Food policy 32(3): 372–93.

Narayanamoorthy A. 2009. Drip and Sprinkler Irrigation in India: Benefits, potential and future directions. Strategic Analyses of the National River Linking Project (NRLP) of India Series 1. India’s Water Future: Scenarios and Issues, pp. 253–66.

Amarasinghe U A, Shah T and Sharma B R (Eds). International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Payero J O, Tarkalson D D, Irmak S, Davison D and Petersen J L. 2008. Effect of irrigation amounts applied with subsurface drip irrigation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency, and dry matter production in a semiarid climate. Agricultural Water Management 95(8): 895–908.

Submitted

2020-07-03

Published

2022-02-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SAXENA, R., KANWAL, V., KHAN, M., VERMA, S., & B, G. (2022). Gains from Improved Technology Adoption in Disadvantaged Regions: Evidences from Bundelkhand Region. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 92(6), 695-699. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i6.101951
Citation