Productivity, profitability and input-use efficiency of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) under conservation agriculture


Abstract views: 144 / PDF downloads: 62

Authors

  • SOURAV GHOSH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • T K DAS ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • NEELMANI RATHI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • K S RANA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • D R BISWAS ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i5.104383

Keywords:

Conservation agriculture, Irrigation water use efficiency, Nutrient use efficiency, Productivity, Profitability, Rice

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2016-17 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to assess the long term impact of conservation agriculture (CA) on productivity, profitability and input-use efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under a rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS). Pooled results revealed that rice grain yield under the CA-based zero till direct seeded rice (ZTDSR) + mungbean residue (MR) – zero till wheat (ZTW) + rice residue (RR) – zero tilled summer mungbean (ZTM) + wheat residue (WR) both with 100% N (4.9 t/ha) and 75% N (4.8 t/ha) was statistically comparable to the conventional practice, i.e. transplanted puddled rice (TPR) – conventional till wheat (CTW) (5.2 t/ha) and TPR – ZTW (5.4 t/ha). Although rice grain yield under ZTDSR+MR–ZTW+RR– ZTM+WR [100% N] was ~5.7% lower compared to farmers’ practice TPR–CTW, net returns of rice (₹ 41.1×103 / ha) was 119.5% higher compared to TPR-CTW, chiefly due to the lower cost of cultivation of ZT-DSR (₹ 47.5×103 / ha) as compared to CT-TPR (₹ 74.8×103 /ha). Partial factor productivity of NPK was highest under the CA treatment ZTDSR+MR–ZTW+RR–ZTM+WR [75% N] (32 kg grain/kg NPK) while ZTDSR+MR–ZTW+RR–ZTM+WR [75% N] [100% N] observed the highest irrigation water use efficiency (0.57 kg/m3). Thus, the novel CA practice ZTDSR+MR–ZTW+RR–ZTM+WR can provide comparable rice yields with higher net returns and nutrient (75% N) and irrigation use efficiencies compared to conventional farmers practice TPR–CTW and hence its adoption may be recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baghel J K, Das T K, Pankaj, Mukherjee I, Nath C P, Bhattacharyya R, Ghosh S and Raj R. 2020. Impacts of conservation agriculture and herbicides on weeds, nematodes, herbicide residue and productivity in direct-seeded rice. Soil and Tillage Research 201: 104634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104634

Bhattacharyya R, Das T K, Pramanik P, Ganeshan V, Saad A A and Sharma A R. 2013. Impacts of conservation agriculture on soil aggregation and aggregate-associated N under irrigated agroecosystem of Indo-Gangetic Plains. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 96: 185–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-013-9585-6

Bhattacharyya R, Das T K, Sudhishri S, Dudwal B, Sharma A R, Bhatia A and Singh G. 2015. Conservation agriculture effects on soil organic carbon accumulation and crop productivity under a rice–wheat cropping system in the western Indo-Gangetic Plains. European Journal of Agronomy 70: 11–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.06.006

Bhushan L, Ladha J K, Gupta R K, Singh S, Tirol-Padre A, Saharawat Y S, Gathala M and Pathak H. 2007. Saving of water and labor in a rice–wheat system with no-tillage direct seeding technologies. Agronomy Journal 99: 1288–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0227

Choudhury B U, Bouman B A M and Singh A K. 2007. Yield and water productivity of rice–wheat on raised beds at New Delhi, India Original Research Article. Field Crops Research 100: 229–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.009

Das T K, Bhattacharyya R, Sharma A R, Das S, Saad A A and Pathak H. 2013. Impacts of conservation agriculture on total soil organic carbon retention potential under an irrigated agro-ecosystem of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains. European Journal of Agronomy 51: 34-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.07.003

Das T K, Nath C P, Das S, Biswas S, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, Raj R, Singh B, Kakralia S K, Rathi N, Sharma A R, Dwivedi B S, Biswas A K and Chaudhari S K. 2020. Conservation Agriculture in rice-mustard cropping system for five years: Impacts on crop productivity, profitability, water-use efficiency, and soil properties. Field Crops Research 250: 107781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107781

Das T K, Saharawat Y S, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, Bandyopadhyay K K, Sharma A R. and Jat M L. 2018. Conservation agriculture effects on crop and water productivity, profitability and soil organic carbon accumulation under a maizewheat cropping system in the North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 215: 222–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.021

Das T K. 1999. Is transformation of weed data always necessary? Annals of Agricultural Research 20: 335–41.

Das T K. 2001. Towards better appraisal of herbicide bio-efficacy. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 71: 676–78.

Gathala M K, Kumar V, Sharma P C, Saharawat Y S, Jat H S, Singh M, Kumar A, Jat M L, Humphreys E, Sharma D K, Sharma S and Ladha J K. 2013. Optimizing intensive cereal-based cropping systems addressing current and future drivers of agricultural change in the north-western Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 177: 85–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.002

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons.

Gupta R K and Seth A. 2007. A review of resource conserving technologies for sustainable management of the rice–wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains. Crop Protection 26: 436–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.04.030

Hobbs P R. 2007. Conservation agriculture: what is it and why is it important for future sustainable food production? Journal of Agricultural Science 145: 127–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859607006892

Humphreys E, Kukal S S, Christen E W, Hira G S, Balwinder-Singh, Sudhir-Yadav and Sharma R K. 2010. Halting the ground water decline in north-west India-which crop technologies will be winners? Advances in Agronomy 109: 155–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385040-9.00005-0

Ibragimov N, Evett S, Esenbekov Y, Khasanova F, Karabaev I, Mirzaev L and Lamers J. 2011. Permanent beds vs. conventional tillage in irrigated arid central Asia. Agronomy Journal 103(4): 1002–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0111

Jat R K, Sapkota T B, Singh R G, Jat M L, Kumar M and Gupta R K. 2014. Seven years of conservation agriculture in a rice–wheat rotation of Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia: yield trends and economic profitability. Field Crops Research 164: 199–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.015

Kienzler K M, Lamers J P A, McDonald A, Mirzabaev A, Ibragimov N, Egamberdiev O, Ruzibaev E and Akramkhanov A. 2012. Conservation agriculture in Central Asia—What do we know and where do we go from here?. Field Crops Research 132: 95–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.008

Kukal S S, Hira G S and Sidhu A S. 2005. Soil matric potentialbased irrigation scheduling to rice (Oryza sativa). Irrigation Science 23: 153–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-005-0103-8

Malik R K and Yadav A. 2008. Direct-seeded rice in the Indo-Gangetic Plain: progress, problems and opportunities. Humphreys E, Roth C H (Eds), Proceedings of Permanent Beds and Rice Residue Management for Rice–Wheat Systems in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. ACIAR Workshop Proceedings No. 127, ACIAR. Canberra,Australia, pp. 124–32.

Nath C P, Das T K, Rana K S, Bhattacharyya R, Pathak H, Paul S, Meena M C and Singh S B. 2017. Weed and nitrogen management effects on weed infestation and crop productivity of wheat–mungbean sequence in conventional and conservation tillage practices. Agricultural Research 6: 33–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-017-0246-x

Saad A A, Das T K, Rana D S and Sharma A R. 2015. Productivity, resource-use efficiency and economics of maize (Zea mays)- wheat (Triticum aestivum)-greengram (Vigna radiata) cropping system under conservation agriculture in irrigated north-western Indo-Gangetic plains. Indian Journal of Agronomy 60(4): 502–10.

Sudhir-Yadav, Gill S, Humphreys E, Kukal S S and Walia U S. 2011. Effect of water management on dry seeded and puddled transplanted rice: Part 1. Crop performance. Field Crops Research 120: 112–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.002

Susha V S, Das T K, Nath C P, Pandey R, Paul S and Ghosh S. 2018. Impacts of tillage and herbicide mixture on weed interference, agronomic productivity and profitability of a maize–wheat system in the North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 219: 180–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.003

Downloads

Submitted

2020-09-04

Published

2020-09-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

GHOSH, S., DAS, T. K., RATHI, N., RANA, K. S., & BISWAS, D. R. (2020). Productivity, profitability and input-use efficiency of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) under conservation agriculture. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(5), 1004-1008. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i5.104383
Citation