Response of rabi onion (Allium cepa) to biofertilizers in a sandy loam alluvial soil

Diksha Tinna; Naveen Garg; Gulab Pandove; Sandeep Sharma; Neena Chawla; Ajmer Singh Dhatt

doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i6.104776

Authors

Diksha Tinna Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
Naveen Garg Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
Gulab Pandove Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
Sandeep Sharma Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
Neena Chawla Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
Ajmer Singh Dhatt Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i6.104776

Keywords:

Azotobacter, Bacillus, Burkholderia, Onion, Quality

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in a factorial randomized block design during rabi 2016-18 at Ludhiana. There were 14 treatments consisting of two factors. Factor I comprised two levels of inorganic fertilizers [100% RDF (recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers) and 75% RDF] and factor II consisted of six combinations of biofertilizers along with a control. The data pooled over years revealed that the utilization of various biofertilizers significantly improved the plant height, number of leaves, 20-bulb weight, bulb equatorial diameter and yield over control at both levels of inorganic fertilizers. However, the per cent increase over their respective control was higher when these biofertilizers were used with 75% RDF than with 100% RDF. Biofertilizer treatments significantly improved the ascorbic acid, total soluble solids and pyruvic acid of bulbs, reduced the physiological loss in bulb weight during storage but the differences in bulb dry matter and ash content were non-significant. The effects of all biofertilizers on soil chemical and microbiological properties were beneficial but non-significant. Two treatments, i.e. 100% RDF + T₆ (Azotobacter + Sphingobacterium + Burkholderia) and 100% RDF + T₁ (Azotobacter + Bacillus) that exhibited 11.5% and 8.6% increment in bulb yield over control (100% RDF) have been identified. Besides, three treatments, i.e. 75% RDF + T₆, 75% RDF + T₁ and 75% RDF + T5 (Azotobacter + Bacillus + Burkholderia) registered 8.3%, 7.8% and 7.3% higher bulb yield over control (100% RDF) and therefore may be recommended to save 25% inorganic fertilizers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bishnoi U. 2015. PGPR interaction: an ecofriendly approach promoting the sustainable agriculture system. Advances in Botanical Research 75: 81–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2015.09.006

Colo J, Hajnal-Jafari T I, Duric S, Stamenov D and Hamidovic S. 2014. Plant growth promotion rhizobacteria in onion production. Polish Journal of Microbiology 63(1): 83–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2014-012

Devi A K B and Ado L. 2005. Effect of fertilizers and biofertilizers on physiological growth parameters of multiplier onion (Allium cepa var. aggregatum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 75(6): 352–4.

FAOSTAT. 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations–Production Data. Available at www.fao.org/faostat Foght J and Aislabie J. 2005. Enumeration of soil microorganisms. Manual of Soil Analysis – Monitoring and Assessing Soil Bioremediation, pp 261-80. Margesin R and Schinner F (Eds). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28904-6_13

Hart F L and Fisher H J. 1971. Determination of pyruvic acid in dehydrated onion. Modern Food Analysis, pp 433-34. Springer- Verlag, New York.

Indira S and Singh S J. 2014. Effect of vermicompost and biofertilizer on yield and quality of rabi onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Puna Red. Agricultural Science Digest 34(2): 144–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0547.2014.00035.4

Jackson M L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis, pp 134-65 and 429-51. Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, India.

Ruzzi M and Aroca R. 2015. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae 196: 124–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.042

Sankar V, Veeraragavathatham D and Kannan M. 2009. Effect of organic farming practices on post harvest storage life and organoleptic quality of yellow onion (Allium cepa). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(8): 608–14.

Shinde K G, Bhalekar M N and Patil B T. 2016. Effect of organic, inorganic and biofertilizers on yield, storage quality and soil nutrient status of onion (Allium cepa L.) under vertisols of western Maharashtra. Vegetable Science 43(1): 91–95.

Talwar D, Singh K, Sardana V and Singh J. 2016. Growth, yield and quality of onion as influenced by integrated nutrient management. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 8: 2295–98.

Thangasamy A and Lawande K E. 2015. Integrated nutrient management for sustainable onion production. Indian Journal of Horticulture 72: 347–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2015.00068.7

Thangasamy A, Sankar V and Lawande K E. 2013. Effect of sulphur nutrition on pungency and storage life of short day onion (Allium cepa). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83: 1086–89.

Yeptho A K, Singh A K, Kanaujia S P and Singh V B. 2012. Quality production of kharif onion (Allium cepa) in response to biofertilizers inoculated organic manures. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 82(3): 236–40.