Identification of stable drought tolerant landraces of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under multiple environments

HARISH D; BHARADWAJ C; TAPAN KUMAR; PATIL B S; MADAN PAL; HEGDE V S; ASHUTOSH SARKER

doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i8.105967

Authors

HARISH D ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
BHARADWAJ C ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
TAPAN KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
PATIL B S ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
MADAN PAL ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
HEGDE V S ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
ASHUTOSH SARKER ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i8.105967

Keywords:

AMMI, Chickpea, Drought, GGE, Landraces

Abstract

Drought is a major constraint to chickpea production leading to maximum crop loss. Further the narrow genetic base of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) can be widened by crossing them to landraces and wild species of which landraces provide valuable sources for abiotic and biotic stresses. The present investigation identifies highly stable drought tolerant landraces using AMMI analysis and GGE biplot techniques. The 42 chickpea genotypes (38 chickpea landraces obtained from West Asia and North Africa (WANA) and 4 known varieties) were evaluated at two locations under randomized block design in irrigated and rainfed condition in two seasons. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and Genotype main effect and genotype × environment interaction (GGE) were employed in the evaluation of genotype. AMMI analyses decomposes SS for GEI in to 3 Interaction Principal Components(PC) of which PC1(79.6%) and PC2(17.8%) explains most of the variability. From AMMI Stability Value (ASV) the genotype G35 (IL184) and G23 (IG5895) were found most stable landraces while Yield Stability Value (YSI) ranking identified G8 (IG5856) as the best genotype, based on stability and mean yield. From GGE biplot analyses the PC1 explains 80.0% and PC2 explains 18.9% of variability. G8(IG5856) performs well under across all the environments with high mean yield. Drought Susceptible Index (DSI) indicated G8 (IG5856) and G2 (ICC4958) to have the lowest DSI at both the locations. From the above investigation the landrace IG 5856 from Jordan was found to be most drought tolerant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bharadwaj C, Srivastava R, Chauhan S K, Satyavathi C T, Kumar J, Faruqui A, Yadav S, Rizvi A H and Kumar T. 2011. Molecular diversity and phylogeny in geographical collection of chickpea (Cicersp.) accessions. J. Genet. 90: 94–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-011-0114-6

Farshadfar E and Mohammadhi J. 2013.AMMI analysis of phenotypic stability in chickpea genotypes over stress and non-stress environments. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5(3): 253–260.

Gauch H G and Zobel R W. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. (In) 'Genotype by- Environment Interaction’, pp 85-122. (Eds) Kang M S and Gauch H G. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049374.ch4

Gauch H G and Zobel R W. 1997. Identifying mega-environment and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37: 311–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020002x

Gauch H G. 2013. A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Science 53: 1860–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0241

Gauch H G.1992. ‘Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs.

Gollob H F. 1968. A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika 33: 73–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289676

Hongyu K and Garc M. 2014.Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI analysis of genotype × environment interaction. Biometrical Letters 51: 89–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2014-0007

Kanouni H, Farayedi Y, Saeid A and Sabaghpour S H. 2015. Stability analyses for seed yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in the Western cold zone of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science 7: 219–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n5p219

Kanouni. 2018. Stability of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces in National Plant Gene Bank of Iran for drylands. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 20: 387–400.

Krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J, Upadhyaya H D, Gowda C L L, Gaur P M, Singh S, Purushothaman R and Varshney R K. 2013.Partitioning coefficient – a trait that contributes to drought tolerance in chickpea. Field Crops Research 149: 354–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.022

Kumar T, Bharadwaj C, Rizvi A H and Shailesh. 2015. Chickpea landraces: a valuable and divergent source for drought tolerance. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 33(3): 1–7.

Mohammadi R, Abdulahi A, Haghparast R and Armion M. 2007. Interpreting genotype_ environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using nonparametric methods. Euphytica 157: 239–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9417-3

Neisse A C, Kirch J L and Hongyu K. 2018. AMMI and GGE Biplot for genotype × environment interaction: a medoid–based hierarchical cluster analysis approach for high–dimensional data. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2018-0008

Oliviera R L, Von Pinho G, Balestre M and Ferreira D V. 2010. Evaluation of maize hybrids and enviromental stratification by the methods AMMI and GGE-biplot. Crop Breed and Appl. Biotechnol 10: 274–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-70332010000300010

Osiru M O, Olanya O M, Adipala E, Kapinga R and Lemaga B. 2009. Yield stability analysis of Ipomoea batatus L. cultivars in diverse environments. Aust J Crop Sci. 3(4): 213–220.

Purchase J L. 1997.Parametric analysis to described G x E interaction and yield stability in winter yield. Ph D thesis, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Purchase J L, Hatting H and Van Deventer CS. 2000. Genotype_ environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa:II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 17: 101–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2000.10634878

Sumathi P, Govindaraj M and Govintharaj P. 2017. Identifying promising pearl millet hybrids using AMMI and clustering models. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 6: 1348–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.602.153

Varshney R K, Thudi M, May G D and Jackson S A. 2010. Legume genomics and breeding. (In) Janick J. Plant Breeding Reviews 33: 257–04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470535486.ch6

Yan W and Kang M S. 2003. GGE biplot analysis:Agraphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420040371

Yan W and Tinker N A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can. J. Plant Sci 86: 623–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/P05-169

Yan W, Hunt L A, Sheng Q and Szlavnics Z. 2000.Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40: 597–05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x

Zobel R W, Wright M J and Gauch H G. 1988.Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80: 388–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x