Developing teaching effectiveness framework for social sciences in agricultural universities
Abstract views: 164 / PDF downloads: 60
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i5.113072
Keywords:
Student ratings, Teaching effectiveness, Teaching effectiveness framework, Teachers’ attributesAbstract
For appropriate technology dissemination to farmers, social sciences in agriculture especially Extension Education act as a bridge connecting researchers and farmers therefore, the aim of post graduate courses at agricultural universities is to develop suitable human resource with desired competencies to enable effective extension work. As teaching effectiveness is crucial for achieving academic excellence and to inculcate desired competencies among students, the attributes of teachers contributing towards teaching effectiveness need to be analysed. This study was conducted during 2019 and examines the perception of 210 postgraduate (M Sc and Ph D) students across 10 agricultural universities of Northern India. Teachers were categorized based on scores of attributes obtained through student ratings. The association between teacher attributes and overall teaching effectiveness was calculated and finally a teaching effectiveness framework was designed based on those attributes, which were significantly associated with teaching effectiveness. It was also found that majority of students rated overall teaching effectiveness under medium category (48.09%) followed by high category (34.76%). In addition, all attributes were found to be positively correlated with overall teaching effectiveness. Out of 32 items under all attributes, 27 items which were significantly associated with teaching effectiveness were included in teaching effectiveness framework. In light of the findings, suggestions were also formulated for teachers regarding their teaching attributes as perceived by students.Downloads
References
Berk R A. 2005. Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 17(1): 48-62.
FAO. 2014. Youth and agriculture: Key challenges and concrete solutions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) and the International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD) Rome, Italy.
Ferroni M and Zhou Y. 2012. Achievements and challenges in agricultural extension in India. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 4(3): 319-46.
Fifth Dean’s Committee Report. 2017. Agricultural Education Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
Galbraith C S, Merrill G B and Kline D M. 2012. Are student evaluations of teaching effectiveness valid for measuring student learning outcomes in business related classes? A neural network and Bayesian analyses. Research in Higher Education 53(3): 353-74.
Kokate K D, Kharde P B, Patil S S and Deshmukh B A. 2016. Farmers’-led extension: experiences and road ahead. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 9(2): 18-21.
Kumar R, Hudda R S, Yadav K and Manjeet. 2018. Utilization of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) forwater management, marketing and weather forecasting. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(10): 1640-43
McGaghieW C, Bordage G and Shea J A. 2001. Problem statement, conceptual framework, and research question. Academic Medicine 76(9): 923-24.
Ponnusamy K. 2013. Impact of public private partnership in agriculture: A review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(8): 803-08.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.