Seed metering device evaluation by Grease Belt Method


Abstract views: 283 / PDF downloads: 78

Authors

  • DEVESH KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • ASHOK TRIPATHI Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh
  • OM PRAKASH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
  • PRATIBHA JOSHI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
  • KALAY KHAN Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Srinagar, Kashmir
  • MANISH KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i10.117424

Keywords:

Grease belt, Hopper levels, Laboratory test, Seed metering mechanism, Soybean planter

Abstract

Soybean [Glycine max. (L.) Merr.] serve as one of the most valuable crop in the world; not only for oil purpose italso feed for livestock and aquaculture. A simple laboratory grease belt method for soybean planter was developed fortesting and calibrating the seed metering mechanism. The study was conducted in the year 2017, in the Departmentof Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Allahabad. The main frame consists of variable speed drive, and greasecoated belt that are fitted with necessary provisions. The second frame consists of seed hopper and seed metering unit.The field and laboratory methods have been developed and used for evaluation of planter performance, each methodhaving its own advantages and shortcomings. In the present study, grease belt was used for laboratory evaluation ofwheel type seed-metering device and investigated the feeding quality, missing index, seed rate, and uniformity ofseeds in the row at various speed of grease belt. The results from grease belt methods were in good agreement andanalysis of variances showed that seed-metering device with 18 cells in 50 rpm performed better than seed-meteringdevice with 32 cells and in other speeds. Calibration of the manually operated seed-cum-fertilizer soybean planterhas been done in the laboratory. During calibration of planter, it found that there was less missing of soybean due tocircular shape of seed. Due to full hopper the pressure was high at the bottom and due to this force on seed of soybeaneasily reaches at the metering device.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adekoya Buchel. 1987. Development a cam activated precision punch planter transnational. Journal of Science and Technology.

Adekanye, Adesoye T, Akande and Mary A. 2015. Development and evaluation of a manual multi-crop planter for peasant farmers elixir agriculture 86: Retrieved from website: 'http:// www.elixirpublishers.com/#abstract_72.

Altuntas E, Ozgoz E, Taser O F and Tekelioglu O. 2006. Assessment of different types furrow openers using a full automatic planter. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 5: 537–54.

Anantachar, M Kumar P G V and Guruswamy T. 2010. Neural network prediction of performance parameters of an inclined plate seed metering device and its reverse mapping for the determination of optimum design and operational parameters. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 72(2): 87–98.

Bamgboye A I and Mofolasayo A S. 2006. Performance evaluation of a two-row okra planter. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR e-journal 8(7). Manuscript PM 06002.

Brooks D and Church B. 1987. Drill performance assessments: Changed approach. British Sugar Beet Review 50(3): 13–15.

Duke S H, L E Schrader and G M Miller. 1977. Low temperature effects on soybean mitochondrial respiration and several dehydrogenates during imbibitions and germination. Plant Physiology 60: 716–22.

Ferriss R S, R E Stuckey, M L Gleason and M R Siegel. 1987. Effects of seed quality, seed treatment, soil source, and initial soil moisture on soybean seedling performance. Physiopathology 77: 140–48.

FAO. 2009. Food security and agricultural mitigation in developing countries: options for capturing Synergies. Rome, Italy. www. fao.org/docrep/012/i1318e/i1318e00.pdf.

Gathala M K, Ladha J K, Kumar V, Saharawat Y S, Kumar V, Sharma P K, Sharma S and Pathak H. 2011. Tillage and crop establishment affects sustainability of South Asian rice–wheat system. Agronomy Journal 103: 961–71.

Gupta R K and Sayre K D. 2007. Conservation agriculture in South Asia. Journal of Agriculture Science 145: 207–14.

Gardner F P, R B Pearch and R L Mitchell. 1985. Seed and germination. (In) Physiology of Crop Plants, p 327. Gardner et al. (Eds). Iowa State University Press.

Giménez J P, Elías J Mongiardini, M Julia Althabegoiti, Julieta Covelli, J Ignacio Quelas, Silvina L, López-García and Aníbal R Lodeiro. 2009. Soybean lectin enhances biofilm formation by Bradyrhizobium japonicum in the absence of plants, International Journal of Microbiology, 2.

Hongxin I A, Lifeng L, G Lulu F and Shifa T. 2015. Study on multi-size seed-metering device for vertical plate soybean precision planter. International Journal Agriculture and Biology Engineering 8(1): 1–8.

Jasa P J and Dickey E C. 1982. Tillage factors affecting corn seed spacing, trans. American Society of Agricultural Engineering 25(6): 1516–19.

Khan K, Moses S C and Kumar A. 2015. The design and fabrication of a manually operated single row multi-crops planter. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 8: 147–58.

Kumar A. 1984. Design and fabrication of manually operated single row planter, M Sc (Agricultural Engineering) thesis, Allahabad Agricultural Institute, Allahabad, UP, (India).

Kachman S D and Smith J A. 1995. Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planters using single seed metering. Trans. American Society of Agricultural Engineering 38(2): 379–87.

Karayel D, Wiesehoff M, Özmerzi A and Müller J. 2005. Laboratory measurement of seed drill seed spacing and velocity of fall of seeds using high-speed camera systems. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 50(2): 89–96.

Leela C and M Saravana kumar. 2019. Development of electronic metering experimental test rig for maize, International journal of current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(8).

Mehta C R, Chandel N S, Senthil kumar T and Singh K K. 2014. Trends of agricultural mechanization in India, trends of agricultural mechanization in India CSAM Policy brief. 2-3.

Murray J R, N Tullberg J and Basnet B B. 2006. Planters and their components; types, attributes, functional requirements, classification and description. Australian centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) monograph-page no. 120–22.

Olajide and Manuwa. 2014. Design, fabrication and testing of a low-cost row-crop planter for peasant farmers. Proceedings of the International Soil Tillage Research Organization (ISTRO). Nigeria Symposium, Nov-, 3 - 6, Akure, Nigeria, pp. 94–100.

Oduma O, P C Eze and S N Onuoha. 2014. A survey of farm machinery utilization and maintenance in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Journal of Experimental Research 2(1): 18–25.

Pradhan S C and Ghosal M K. 2012. Design modifications of cup in cup feed metering seed drill for seed pattern characteristics study of paddy seeds. Engineering and Technology in India 3: 7–12.

Sharma D N and Mukesh S. 2013. Farm Machinery Design, 3rd edn. Jain Brothers, New Delhi, India.

Sharma P T and K N Dewangan. 2020. Design and comparative performance of shapes of positive seed knocking devices for a vertical plate seed metering mechanism. Indian Journal of Hill Farming 33(1): 164–70

Sam and Okoon. 2013. Comparative chemotaxonomic investigations on Physalis angulata Linn. and Physalis micrantha Linn.(Solanaceace). Asian Journal of Applied Sciences 1(5): 220–28.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-10-29

Published

2021-11-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, D., TRIPATHI, A., PRAKASH, O., JOSHI, P., KHAN, K., & KUMAR, M. (2021). Seed metering device evaluation by Grease Belt Method. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(10), 1443–1446. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i10.117424
Citation