Effect of grass-based cropping systems on carbon sequestration under changing climate scenario


Abstract views: 351 / PDF downloads: 111

Authors

  • B L KUMHAR College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur 482 004, India
  • K K AGRAWAL College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur 482 004, India
  • H K RAI College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur 482 004, India
  • A AHIRWAL College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur 482 004, India
  • H P MEENA Agricultural Research Station, Agriculture University, Kota
  • RAJENDRA KUMAR YADAV Agricultural Research Station, Agriculture University, Kota
  • B D YADAV Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i10.117512

Keywords:

Carbon sequestration potential, Carbon stocks, Climate change, Cropping systems

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted during two consecutive years of 2018-19 and 2019-20 entitled "Effect of grass-based cropping systems on soil health improvement in terms of carbon sequestration under changing climate scenario". Pearl millet napier hybrid sole crop was exhibited significantly higher total dry biomass 52.20 t/ha, above ground carbon 18.45 Mg/ha, below ground carbon 5.54 Mg/ha, total above and below ground carbon 23.99 Mg/ ha, above ground CO2 sequestration 67.71 Mg/ha, below ground CO2 sequestration 20.32 Mg/ha and total above and below ground CO2 sequestration 88.02 Mg/ha during experimentation. PN hybrid in paired rows + rice bean - Egyptian clover noted higher soil organic carbon stock 14.75, 12.68 and 10.03 Mg/ha, soil CO2 sequestration 54.17, 46.52 and 36.79 Mg/ha at 0-15, 15-30 and 30- 45 cm soil depth respectively, total carbon stock 57.96 Mg/ha, total CO2 sequestration 212.70 Mg/ha, and carbon credit ₹ 49264 /ha/yr over guinea grass sole crop. Among the different grass based cropping systems maximum total carbon stock and total CO2 sequestration under PN hybrid in paired rows + ricebean - Egyptian clover but pearl millet napier (PN) hybrid sole higher fodder carbon stock and fodder CO2 sequestration over guinea grass sole crop for soil health improvement under present scenario of climate change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajit, Dhyani, S K, Handa A K, Newaj R, Chavan S B, Alam B, Prasad R, Ram A, Rizvi R H, Jain A K, Uma, Tripathi D, Shakhela R R, Patel A G, Dalvi V V, Saxena A K, Parihar, A K S, Backiyavathy M R, Sudhagar R J, Bandeswaran C and Gunasekaran S. 2017. Estimating carbon sequestration potential of existing agroforestry systems in India. Agroforest System 91: 1101–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9986-z

Allen S E, Grimshaw H M and Rowland A P. 1986. Chemical Analysis. Method in Plant Ecology, pp 285–344. P D Moore and Chapman (Eds), America: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Bhardwaj A K, Rajwar D, Mandal U K, Ahamad S, Kaphaliya B, Minhas P S, Prabhakar M, Banyal R, Singh R, Chaudhari S K and Sharma P C. 2019. Impact of carbon inputs on soil carbon fractionation, sequestration and biological responses under major nutrient management practices for rice-wheat cropping systems. Scientific Reports 9: 91–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45534-z

Chatterjee D, Kuotsu R, Merasenla A, Saha S, Ray S K and Ngachan S V. 2019. Does rise in temperature adversely affect soil fertility, carbon fractions, microbial biomass and enzyme activities under different land uses. Current Science 116(25): 2044–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i12/2044-2054

Dabin Z, Pengwei Y, Na Z, Weidong C, Suiqi Z, Yangyang L, Donglin H, Bingnian Z, Zhaohui W and Yajun G. 2019. Building up the oil carbon pool via the cultivation of green manure crops in the Loess Plateau of China. Geoderma 337: 425–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.053

Fornara D, Olave R and Higgins A. 2020. Evidence of low response of soil carbon stocks to grassland intensification. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 287: 106705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106705

Jain N K, Meena H N, Yadav R S and Jat R S. 2018. Biomass production, carbon sequestration potential and productivity of different peanut (Arachis hypogaea) based cropping systems and their effect on soil carbon dynamics. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(7): 1044–53.

Kane D. 2015. Carbon sequestration potential on agricultural lands a review of current science and available practices. National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, p 35.

Kumar B T N and Babalad H B. 2018. Soil organic carbon, carbon sequestration, soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, and soil enzymatic activity as influenced by conservation agriculture in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) + soybean (Glycine max L.) intercropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(4): 553–58.

Kumhar B L, Agrawal K K, Jha A K and Rai H K. 2020a. Variability of soil infiltration rate in different grass based cropping system in Central India. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences 8 (4): 109-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8230

Kumhar B L, Agrawal K K and Jha A K. 2020b. Weed screening in grass based cropping system in Central India. Journal of Biotechnology and Crop Science 9(14): 94–99.

Kundu C K, Das H and Ghosh P K. 2019. Soil organic carbon sequestration potential and economic profitability of perennial forage crops under different mulching environments. Range Management & Agroforestry 40(1): 83–88.

Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123: 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032

Ledo A, Smith P, Zerihun A, Whitaker J, Vicente J L V, Qin Z, McNamara N P, Zinn Y L, Llorente M, Liebig M, Kuhnert M, Dondini M, Don A, Pines E D, Datta A, Bakka H, Eduardo A and Jon H. 2020. Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops. Global Change Biology : 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15120

Mondal M, Das T K, Thomas P, Mishra A K, Bandyopadhyay K K, Aggarwal P and Chakraborty D. 2019. Effect of conservation agriculture on soil hydro-physical properties, total and particulate organic carbon and root morphology in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 89(1): 46–55.

Nishanth B, Rajkumar J S I, Meenakshi S S, Sivakumar T, Sankaran V M and Thanga T V. 2013. Sequestration of atmospheric carbon through forage crops cultivated in Ramayanpatti, Tirunelveli District, Tamilnadu, India. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences 1(3): 11–14.

Pearson T R, Brown S L and Birdsey R A. 2007. Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon, general technical report, USAID forest service, pp 1-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-18

Sarvade S, Upadhyay V B and Agrawal S B. 2019. Quality fodder production through silvo-pastoral system: a review. Agroforestry for Climate Resilience and Rural Livelihood: 345–59.

Sathiya B K and Babu C. 2016. Perennial forages as a tool for sequestering atmospheric carbon by best management practices for better soil quality and environmental safety. Forage Research 42 (3): 149–57.

Soni M L, Yadava N D, Beniwal R K, Singh J P, Kumar S and Birbal. 2013. Grass based strip cropping systems for controlling soil erosion and enhancing system productivity under drought situations of hot arid western Rajasthan. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistics Sciences 9(2): 685–92.

Tanwar S P S, Kumar P, Verma A, Bhatt R K, Singh A, Lal K, Patidar M and Mathur B K. 2019. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in the Indian arid zone. Current Science 117(12): 2014–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v117/i12/2014-2022

Downloads

Submitted

2021-11-02

Published

2021-11-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMHAR, B. L., AGRAWAL, K. K., RAI, H. K., AHIRWAL, A., MEENA, H. P., YADAV, R. K., & YADAV, B. D. (2021). Effect of grass-based cropping systems on carbon sequestration under changing climate scenario. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(10), 1482–1486. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i10.117512
Citation