Screening of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) mini-core germplasm sub-set for tolerance to wilt and pod borers
471 / 331
Keywords:
Pigeonpea, Mini-core sub-set, Host Plant Resistance, Biotic stresses’ toleranceAbstract
Biotic stresses are the major production constraints of pigeonpea crop including legume pod borer, spotted
pod borer and pod fly and Fusarium wilt which cause significant yield losses. A mini-core sub-set of pigeonpea
consisting of 146 accessions along with 4 control entries were screened against pod borer complex and wilt under field conditions in 2018 and 2019 at the research farm of ICAR of National Institute of Biotic Stress Management, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Three accessions, viz. ICP7314, ICP7426 and ICP14819 were found to be moderately resistant to pod fly. Additionally, ICP 7426 was moderately susceptible to both the Lepidoptera pod borers. Five accessions, ICP9045, ICP9414, ICP9750, ICP14900 and ICP14903 were resistant to Fusarium wilt and 9 more accessions were moderately resistant. The identified accessions can be utilized in crop improvement which may provide resistance and/or tolerance against pod borers and wilt disease.
Downloads
References
Gupta S, Rana N and Bhagat J. 2018. Screening of pigeonpea germplasms against the pod borer complex over a period of two years under field conditions. Journal of Pharmacology and Phytochemistry 7(2): 2402–05.
Kavitha Z and Vijayaraghavan C. 2017. Screening of pigeonpea genotypes against webbing caterpillar [Maruca vitrata (Geyer)] and gram pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 6(12): 3899–3907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.450
Kooner B S and Cheema H K. 2006. Evaluation of pigeopea genotypes for resistance to pod borer complex. Indian Journal of Crop Science 1(1-2): 194–96.
Mohar S, Narinder K G, Mukesh K R, Om P D and Dutta M. 2014. Pigeonpea genetic resources and its utilization in India, current status and future prospects. Journal of Plant Science Research 1(2): 107.
Murali Baskaran R K, Jain S K, Sivalingam P N, Mooventhan P, Sridhar J, Sharma K C, Kaushal P and Kumar J. 2019.
National Status of Biotic Stresses of Crops, ICAR-National Institute of Biotic stress Management, Raipur, 174 p. (ISBN: 978-81-942788-1-8).
Naresh J S, Sharma S S and Dahiya B S. 1993. Assessment of losses caused by Heliothis armigera and Melanagromyza in eight varieties of pigeonpea in Hisar. Indian Journal of Plant Protection 11: 37–39.
Obala J, Saxena R K, Singh V K, Kale S M, Garg V C V, Kumar C V S, Saxena K B, Tongoona P, Sibiya J and Varshney R K. 2020. Seed protein content and its relationships with agronomic traits in pigeonpea is controlled by both main and epistatic effects QTLs. Scientific Reports 10: 214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56903-z
Pande S, Sharma M and Guvvala G. 2013. An updated review of biology, pathogenicity, epidemiology and management of wilt disease of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Journal of Food Legumes 26(1): 1–14.
Pawar S V, Deshpande G D and Dey U. 2015. Field resistance of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] germplasm lines to Fusarium wilt disease in India. Legume Research 38(5): 658–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v38i5.5947
Reddy M V, Nene Y L, Raju T N, Kannaiyan J, Remanandan P, Mengesha M H and Amin K S. 1995. Registration of four pigeonpea germplasm lines resistant to Fusarium wilt: ICP 8863, ICP 11292, ICP 11299, and ICP 12745. Crop Science 35(2): 595-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500020063x
Sharma M, Ghosh R, Telangre R, Rathore A, Saifulla M, Mahalinga D M, Saxena D R and Jain Y K. 2016. Environmental influences on pigeonpea Fusarium udum interactions and stability of genotypes to Fusarium wilt. Frontiers of Plant Science 7: 253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00253
Sharma M, Rathore A, Naga Mangala U, Ghosh R, Sharma S, Upadhyay H D and Pande S. 2012. New sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt and sterility mosaic disease in a mini-core collection of pigeonpea germplasm. European Journal of Plant Pathology 133: 707–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-012-9949-9
Singh A K, Singh S S, Prakash V and Kumar S. 2015. Pulses production in India: Present status, bottleneck and way forward. Journal of Agricultural Search 2(2): 75–88.
Sreekanth M, Rajamani S, Koteshwararao Y and Ramana M V. 2019. Performance of genotypes against pod borers in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)]. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 7(6): 33–36
Upadhyaya H D, Reddy L J, Gowda C L L, Reddy K N and Singh S. 2006. Development of a mini core subset for enhanced and diversified utilization of pigeonpea germplasm resources. Crop Science 46(5): 2127–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0032
Yadav A S, Kumar S, Kumar N and Ram H. 2019. Pulses production and productivity: Status, potential and way forward for enhancing farmers income. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 8(4): 2315–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.270
Yohane N E, Shimelis H, Laing M, Mathew I and Shayanowako A. 2020. Phenotypic divergence analysis in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh) germplasm accessions. Agronomy 10: 1682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111682
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.