Assessment of morpho-genetic diversity of guava (Psidium guajava) hybrids and genotypes


Abstract views: 420 / PDF downloads: 157

Authors

  • NIKHIL H N ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • AMIT KUMAR GOSWAMI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • S K SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • CHAVLESH KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • SUNEHA GOSWAMI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • RAKESH SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • C BHARADWAJ ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • NAVEEN KUMAR MAURYA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i11.118576

Keywords:

Diversity analysis, Leaf lamina, Leaf shape, Neighbour-joining, Stomatal conductance, Transpiration rate

Abstract

A total of 20 diverse guava genotypes, including the newly bred hybrids were characterized using the morphological, physio-biochemical parameters and microsatellite markers at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi during 2018-19. Most of the qualitative morphological and physio-biochemical parameters had a coefficient of variation value >20%, which indicated substantial diversity. The longest leaves (14.87 cm) were recorded in Lalit, which was statistically at par with Pant Prabhat (14.67 cm), while amongst the hybrids, it is in GH 2018-10 (13.93 cm). The maximum leaf area was recorded in Pant Prabhat (60.33 cm2) while amongst hybrids it was in GH 2018-2 (53.40 cm2). The highest stomatal conductance and net photosynthetic rate was recorded in guava genotype Shweta (9.63 μmol/m2/s) (0.25 mol/m2/sec) while amongst the hybrids it was in GH 2018-8 (8.73μmol/m2/s) (0.26 mol/m2/sec), respectively. The mean genetic diversity indices, viz. major allelic frequency, number of alleles, gene diversity, heterozygosity and polymorphic information content of eight SSRs were 0.497, 3.75, 0.599, 0.071 and 0.542, respectively among the guava genotypes. Furthermore, the eight SSRs based Neighbour-joining (N-J) tree separated the newly bred guava hybrids into different clusters, clades and out-groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aebi H. 1984. Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology 105: 121–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3

Anonymous. 2018-19 (3rd Advance Estimate). National Horticulture Board. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Gurugram, Haryana, http://www.nhb.gov.in/

Castillo F J, Penel C and Greppin H. 1984. Peroxidase release induced by ozone in Sedum album leaves: involvement of Ca2+. Plant Physiology 74(4): 846–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.74.4.846

Chaves M M and Oliveira M M. 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 2365–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh269

Dhindsa R S, Plumb-Dhindsa P and Thorpe T A.1981. Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeabi l i ty and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany 32(1): 93–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/32.1.93

Dinesh M R and Vasugi C. 2010. Guava improvement in India and future needs. Journal of Horticultural Sciences 5(2): 94–108.

Doyle J J and Doyle J L. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13–15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2419362

Govaerts R, Sobral M, Ashton P, Barrie F, Holst B K, Landrum L L, Matsumoto K, Mazine F F, Lughadha E N, Proneça C and Soares-Silva L H. 2008. World checklist of Myrtaceae. Royal Botanic Gardens.

Kareem A, Jaskani M J, Mehmood A, Khan I A, Awan F S and Sajid M W. 2018. Morpho-genetic profiling and phylogenetic relationship of guava (Psidium guajava L.) as genetic resources in Pakistan. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 40(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452018069

Kumar C, Kumar R, Singh S K, Goswami A K, Nagaraja A, Paliwal R and Singh R. 2020. Development of novel g-SSR markers in guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Allahabad Safeda and their application in genetic diversity, population structure and cross species transferability studies. Plos One 15(8):e0237538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237538

Kumari S, Nagaraja A, Srivastav M, Banoth S, Mithra A C, Goswami A K and Khan Y J.2018. Diversity analysis of guava (Psidium guajava) germplasm collection. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(3): 489–97.

Liu K and Muse S V. 2005. PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21(9): 2128–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282

Ma Z, Liu S, Liang Z, Xu S and Hu W. 2020. Analysis of genetic diversity of 45 guava germplasm evaluated using SSR markers. International Journal of Fruit Science 20(3): 385–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2019.1640168

Mani A, Mishra R and Thomas G. 2011. Elucidation of diversity among Psidiums pecies using morphological and SPAR methods. Journal of Phytology 3(8): 53–61.

Methela N J, Faruk O, Islam M S and Mokter M. 2019. Morphological characterization of guava germplasm (Psidium sp.). Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 20(01): 1671–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18801/jbar.200119.203

Nogueira A M, Ferreira A, Ferreira M F and Mangaravite E. 2012. Preliminary study of wild guava from Espirito Santo and Minas Gerais by continuous descriptors. (In) III International Symposium on Guava and other Myrtaceae 959: pp 35–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.959.3

Pandey P, Kumar R, Mishra D S and Singh A. 2017. Morphological and molecular characterization of guava. International Journal of Chemical Studies 5(4): 533–38.

Pavel A B and Vasile C I. 2012. PyElph-a software tool for gel images analysis and phylogenetics. BMC Bioinformatics 13(1): 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-9

Rajan S, Misra A K and Ravishankar H. 2011. Guava Descriptors. Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow. 9p.

Rajan S H and Negi S S. 2007. Improvement of guava through breeding. Acta Horticulturae 735: 31–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.735.2

Risterucci A M, Duval M F, Rohde W and Billotte N. 2005. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from Psidium guajava L. Molecular Ecology Notes 5(4): 745–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01050.x

Ruiz D and Egea J. 2008. Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm. Euphytica 163: 143–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9640-y

Sharma A, Sehrawat S K, Singhrot R S and Ajinath T. 2010. Morphological and chemical characterization of Psidium species. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 38(1): 28–32.

Shiva B, Nagaraja A, Srivastav M, Kumari S, Goswami A K, Singh R and Arun M B.2017. Characterization of guava (Psidium guajava) germplasm based on leaf and fruit parameters. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87(5): 634–8.

Singh B P and Rana R S. 1993. Promising Fruit Introduction. Advances in Horticulture, pp 43–66. Chadha K L, Pareek OP (Eds). New Delhi: Malhotra Publishing House.

Sitther V, Zhang D, Harris D L, Yadav A K, Zee F T and Meinhardt LW. 2014. Genetic characterization of guava (Psidium guajava L.) germplasm in the United States using microsatellite markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 61(4): 829–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-014-0078-5

Solanki I S, Ahlawat V P, Charia A S, Sehrawat S K and Dahiya D S. 2011. Crop improvement scenario in guava. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science 40 (1/2): 50–8.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-12-02

Published

2021-12-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

N, N. H., GOSWAMI, A. K., SINGH, S. K., KUMAR, C., GOSWAMI, S., SINGH, R., BHARADWAJ, C., & MAURYA, N. K. (2021). Assessment of morpho-genetic diversity of guava (Psidium guajava) hybrids and genotypes. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(11), 1640–1645. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i11.118576
Citation