Evaluation of black gram (Vigna mungo) genepool against Callosobruchus maculatus and diversity analysis inter se

S K PANIGRAHI; K TRIPATHI; R SINGH; R KUMAR; P SANGHAMITRA; D P WANKHEDE; N SINGH; K K D DUBEY; KAVITA GUPTA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v92i7.122390

Authors

S K PANIGRAHI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
K TRIPATHI ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi
R SINGH ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi
R KUMAR ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi
P SANGHAMITRA ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha
D P WANKHEDE ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi
N SINGH ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi
K K D DUBEY Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh
KAVITA GUPTA ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi-110012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i7.122390

Abstract

The present study was carried out at ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi during 2020–21
to evaluate the differential reaction of 69 germplasm accessions representing black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] landraces and its crop wild relatives for resistance against Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) under artificial infestation et-up using ‘No-choice test’ method and analyze their genetic diversity using SSR markers. After emergence of adult beetles, the accessions were studied for the growth parameters like total oviposition, exit holes, adult emergence (AE), per cent seed weight loss (PSWL) and growth index (GI), which varied significantly. Based on the key traits, viz. AE and PSWL, the accessions were categorized into six groups, viz. immune (I), resistant (R), moderately resistant (MR), moderately susceptible (MS), susceptible (S) and highly susceptible (HS). Accessions IC259504 (Vigna vexillata) and IC424616 (Vigna mungo) were immune and resistant to bruchid infestation respectively. Moreover, the genetic diversity parameters such as allele number, PIC values and observed heterozygosity indicated considerable diversity among the accessions. The reported immune and resistant accessions could be used as donor parents in the Vigna breeding programme for transferring bruchid resistance factor(s) to agronomically superior cultivars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amusa O, Ogunkanmi L, Adetumbi J, Akinyosoye S and Ogundipe O. 2018. Genetics of bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus Fab.) resistance in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Journal of Stored Products Research 75: 18–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.11.004

Bangar P, Chaudhury A, Umdale S, Kumari R, Tiwari B, Kumar S, Gaikwad A B and Bhat K V. 2018. Detection and

characterization of polymorphic simple sequence repeats markers for the analysis of genetic diversity in Indian mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 78: 111–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2018.00013.5

Doyle J. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13–15.

Duraimurugan P, Pratap A, Singh S K and Gupta S. 2014. Evaluation of screening methods for bruchid beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis) resistance in greengram (Vigna radiata) and black gram (Vigna mungo) genotypes and influence of seed physical characteristics on its infestation. Vegetos 27(1): 60–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2229-4473.27.1.011

Eker T, Erler F, Adak A, Imrek B, Guven H, Tosun HS, Sari D, Sari H, Upadhyaya H D, Toker C and Ikten. 2018. Screening

of chickpea accessions for resistance against the pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 76: 51–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.12.007

Gediya N, Patel A, Kumar S, Kumar D, Parmar J and Patel S. 2019. Phenotypic variability, path analysis and molecular

diversity analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Vegetos 32(2): 167–80.

Giga P. 1995. Selection of oviposition sites by the cowpea weevilsCallosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic.) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 16(2): 145–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400017021

Gujar G T and Yadav T D. 1978. Feeding of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) and Callosobruchus chinensis (Linn.) in green gram. Indian Journal of Entomology 40(2): 108–12.

Gupta S and Gopalakrishna T. 2009. Genetic diversity analysis in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] using AFLP and transferable microsatellite markers from azuki bean [Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi & Ohashi]. Genome 52(2): 120–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/G08-107

Howe R W. 1971. A parameter for expressing the suitability of an environment for insect development. Journal of Stored Products Research 7(1): 63–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-474X(71)90039-7

Indhu S, Manivannan N, Mahalingam A and Kavitha Z. 2018. Variability for bruchid resistance in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 9(2):786–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2018.00097.2

IRRI. 2007. CropStat for Windows Version 7.2. International Rice Research Institute. Metro Manila, Philippines.

Jackai L and Singh S. 1988. Screening techniques for host plant resistance to cowpea insect pests. Bulletins of Tropical Grain Legume 35: 2–18

Jackai L and Asante S K. 2003. A case for the standardization of protocols used in screening cowpea, Vigna unguiculata for resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera:Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 39(3): 25–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(01)00058-3

Kaewwongwal A, Kongjaimun A, Somta P, Chankaew S, Yimram T and Srinives P. 2015. Genetic diversity of the black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] gene pool as revealed by SSR markers. Breeding science 65(2): 127–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.65.127

Liu K and Muse S V. 2005. PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21(9): 2128–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282

Nei M, Tajima F and Tateno Y. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Journal of molecular evolution 19(2): 153–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300753

Panigrahi S K, Tripathi K and Gupta K. 2021. Screening of black gram (Vigna mungo) and its crop wild relatives against Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) and correlation of resistance with seed physical parameters. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 34(3): 455–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-1926.2021.00039.5

Pavel A and Vasile C. 2012. PyElph-a software tool for gel imagesanalysis and phylogenetics. BMC bioinformatics 13(1): 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-9

Petzold-Maxwell J E, Wong S and Arellano C and Gould F. 2011. Host plant direct defence against eggs of its specialist herbivore, Heliothis subflexa. Ecological Entomology 36(6): 700–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01315.x

Pratap A, Das A, Kumar S and Gupta S. 2021. Current perspectives on introgression breeding in food legumes. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 2118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.589189

Pritchard J K, Stephens M and Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2): 945–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/155.2.945

Pyngrope A, Noren S, Wricha T, Sen D, Khanna V and Pattanayak A. 2015. Genetic diversity analysis of black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] using morphological and molecular markers. International Journal of Applied and Pure Science and Agriculture 1(8): 104–13.

Sangiri C, Kaga A, Tomooka N, Vaughan D and Srinives P. 2007. Genetic diversity of the mungbean (Vigna radiata,

Leguminosae) genepool on the basis of microsatellite analysis. Australian Journal of Botany 55(8) :837–47.

Suvan P, Patel K and Kumar S. 2020. Evaluation of SSR-based genetic diversity, protein and mineral content in black gram genotypes. Journal of King Saud University-Science 32(1): 1029–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2019.09.016

Tondonba S, Khanna V and Tejaswini V. 2018. Crossability studies and genetic diversity analysis in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] using molecular markers. Agrotechnology 7(2): 179.

Tripathi K, Chauhan S K, Gore P G, Prasad T V, Srinivasan K and Bhalla S. 2015. Screening of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] accessions against pulse-beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Legume Research-An International Journal 38(5): 675–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v38i5.5949

Tripathi K, Chauhan S K, Gore P G, Mehta P S, Bisht I S and Bhalla S. 2017. Evaluation of wheat landraces of northwestern Himalaya against rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L.) vis-a-vis physical seed parameters. Plant Genetic Resources 15(4): 321–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262115000672

Tripathy S K. 2016. Bruchid resistance in food legumes-an overview. Research Journal of Biotechnology 11:7.

Zhang H, Mittal N, Leamy L, Barazani O and Song B. 2017. Back into the wild—Apply untapped genetic diversity of wild relatives for crop improvement. Evolutionary Applications 10(1): 5–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12434