Multi-trait multi environment analysis for stability in MABC lines of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
Abstract views: 210
/ 
PDF downloads: 174
Authors
-
J JORBEN
PhD scholar
-
APOORVA RAO
Research Scholar
-
C BHARADWAJ
Principal Scientist
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1651-7878
-
S D NITESH
PhD scholar
-
NEHA TIWARI
Associate Scientist
-
TAPAN KUMAR
Associate Scientist
-
D R SAXENA
scientist
-
M YASIN
scientist
-
P L SONTAKKE
Principal scientist
-
JAGDISH E JAHAGIRDAR
Principal scientist
-
V S HEGDE
Principal scientist
Keywords:
MABC, Fusarium wilt, MTSI, GGEAbstract
Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris) is a major disease that can cause up to 90% yield loss in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). The presence of 8 physiological races of Foc (0, 1A, 1B/C, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) makes it a complex task in the development of disease-resistant cultivar. Thus, Pyramiding of Foc races 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 was undertaken using WR 315 as donor and Pusa 372 as recurrent parent through Marker assisted backcross (MABC) breeding approach. A total of 20 genotypes, including 17 MABC derived lines of Pusa 372 × WR 315, susceptible parent (Pusa 372), resistant check (WR 315) and national check (JG 16) were used. Multi-location testing of advanced MABC lines at 4 different regions (Amla, Badnapur, Sehore, IARI-New Delhi) was carried out using randomised block design (RBD) in two replications during 2020–21 winter (rabi) season. Usually, multi environment testing is performed involving a single trait, which provides lower reliability in selection of lines, compared to multi-trait analysis. The present study identifies highly stable Fusarium wilt resistant lines with higher yield advantage using MTSI (Multi trait stability index) and GGE (Genotype main effect and genotype × environment interaction) biplot methodology. From GGE biplot analyses the PC1 explains 84.97% and PC2 explains 8.96% of variability. MTSI results revealed that genotype (G) 1, 4 and 3 were stable for the multiple characters studied. But, based on GGE-mean stability value G 11, 12 and 3 were identified for higher yield and better stability values. Based on MTSI and GGE, G 3 may be considered as a stable line for multiple traits including yield superiority.
Downloads
References
Allard R W and Bradshaw A D. 1964. Implications of genotype × environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop science 4(5): 503–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400050021x
Baxevanos D, Goulas C, Rossi J and Braojos E. 2008. Separation of cotton cultivar testing sites based on representativeness and discriminating ability using GGE biplots. Agronomy Journal 100(5): 1230–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0363
Benakanahalli N K, Sridhara S, Ramesh N, Olivoto T, Sreekantappa G, Tamam N, Abdelbacki A M M, Elansary H O and Abdelmohsen S A. 2021. A Framework for Identification of Stable Genotypes Based on MTSI and MGDII Indexes: An Example in Guar (Cymopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agronomy Journal 11(6): 1221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061221
Bharadwaj C, Srivastava R, Chauhan S K, Satyavathi C T, Kumar J, Faruqui A, Yadav S, Rizvi A H and Kumar T. 2011. Molecular diversity and phylogeny in geographical collection of chickpea (Cicer sp.) accessions. Journal of Genetics 90: 94–100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-011-0114-6
Blanche S B and Myers G O. 2006. Identifying discriminating locations for cultivar selection in Louisiana. Crop Science 46(2): 946–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0279
Bornhofen E, Todeschini M H, Stoco M G, Madureira A , Marchioro V S, Storck L and Benin G. 2018. Wheat yield improvements in Brazil: Roles of genetics and environment. Crop Science 58(1): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0358
Comstock R E and Moll R H. 1963. Genotype-environmentinteractions. Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding, pp. 164–196. Hanson W D, Robinson H F (Eds). National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council Publication, Washington, DC, USA
Dehghani H, Ebadi A and Yousefi A 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal 98(2): 388–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0310
Dixit G P, Srivastava A K and Singh N P 2019. Marching towards self-sufficiency in chickpea. Current Science 116(2): 239–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i2/239-242
Gauch H G and Zobel R 1996. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction. Chemical Rubber Company press, Boca Raton, Florida. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049374
Harish D, Bharadwaj C, Tapan Kumar, Patil B S, Madan Pal, Hegde V S and Ashutosh Sarker. 2020. Identification of stable drought tolerant landraces of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under multiple environments. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 90(8): 1575–81.
Haware M P and Nene Y L 1982. Races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri. Plant disease 66(9): 809–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-66-809
Lakew T, Tariku S, Alem T and Bitew M. 2014. Agronomic performances and stability analysis of upland rice genotypes in North West Ethiopia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 4(4): 1–9.
Mohammadi R and Amri A. 2012. Analysis of genotype × environment interaction in rainfed durum wheat of Iran using GGE-biplot and non-parametric methods. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 92(4): 757–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2011-133
Nitesh S D, ParashuramPatroti and Shilpa Parashuram. 2021. TraitStasts: Statistical Data Analysis for Randomized Block Design Experiments. R Package version 1.0.1.
Olivoto T and Lucio A D C. 2020. Metan: An R package for multi environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11(6): 783–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13384
Olivoto T, Lucio A D, da Silva J A, Marchioro V S, de Souza V Q and Jost E. 2019. Mean performance and stability in multi environment trials I: Combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agronomy Journal 111(6): 2949–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.03.0220
Sharma M, Ghosh R, Tarafdar A, Rathore A, Chobe D R, Kumar A V, Gaur P M, Samineni S, Gupta Om, Singh N P, Saxena D R, Sanifulla M, Pithia M S , Ghante P H, Deyanand M, Mahalinga, Upadhyay J B and Harer P N. 2019. Exploring the genetic cipher of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) through identification and multi-environment validation of resistant sources against Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris). Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 3: 78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00078
Yan W and Kang M S. 2002. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. Chemical Rubber Company press. Boca Raton, Florida. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420040371
Yan W. 2010. Optimal use of biplots in analysis of multi-location variety test data. Acta Agronomica Sinica 36(11): 1805–19.
Zuffo A M, Steiner F, Aguilera J G, Teodoro P E, Teodoro L P R and Busch A. 2020. Multi trait stability index: A tool for simultaneous selection of soya bean genotypes in drought and saline stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 206(6): 815–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12409
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.
How to Cite
