Global status of lentil production with special reference to India


Abstract views: 868 / PDF downloads: 743

Authors

  • A AMARENDER REDDY ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 057, India
  • D P MALIK ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 057, India
  • MONIKA DEVI

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i4.123972

Abstract

India needs to increase it pulse production to meet the growing demand. Lentil is one of the important pulse crop grown in winter season in tropical and subtropical regions of world. The study analysed the trends in production and trade scenario in India and globally from 2000–2018 and came out with strategies for increasing production. The state-wise analysis was carried out for major producing states like Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal and Rajasthan from 2000–2019. The lentil production in the world reached around 6.33 million tonnes in 2018 with an annual growth rate of 4.4% since last 20 years. Asia alone contributed more than half of total global lentil production. The share of American and Oceania regions in global lentil production increased in recent years. There was increase in lentil yield in recent years in Africa, Asia and American regions due to adoption of improved
production technologies. India and Canada together contributed more than 50% of total world lentil production. Lentil yield was highest in Canada (1425 kg/ha), lowest in India (744 kg/ha) in 2018. The lentil production in India touched 1.47 million tonnes with larger share contributed by Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal in 2018. India is the leading importing nation sharing more than one-fourth of total world import during last five years. Adoption of drought, heat, biotic stresses tolerant high yielding cultivars are required to meet estimated demand of 2.00 million tonnes by 2030.
Keywords: Agricultural production, Economics, Legumes, Lentil, Policy Interventions, Trade

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad N, Sinha D K and Singh K M. 2018. Economic analysis of production and instability of lentil in major lentil growing states of India. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience 6(1): 593–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.6213

AICRP. 2019. All India Coordinated Research Project on Improvement of MULLaRP. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.

Chand R, Raju S S, and Reddy A A. 2015. Assessing performance of pulses and competing crops based on market prices and natural resource valuation. Journal of Food Legumes 28(4), 335–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2015.00034.8

FAOSTAT. 2019. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/, accessed on 12.1.2019.

Hasan M N, Monayem M A, Islam M S, Alam Q M and Hossain M I. 2008. Change and instability in area and production of wheat and maize in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 33(3): 409–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v33i3.1600

Joshi P K, Kishore A and Roy D. 2017. Making Pulses Affordable Again-Policy Options from the Farm to Retail in India. Economic and Political Weekly 52(1): 37–42.

Maheshawari S K, Bhat N A, Masoodi S D and Beigh M A. 2008. Chemical control of lentil wilt caused kby Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis. Annals of Plant Protection Science 16: 419–21.

Materne M and Reddy A A. 2007. Commercial cultivation and profitability. Lentil: An Ancient Crop for Modern Times, pp. 173–186. Yadav S S, McNeil D L and Stevenson Philip C (Eds). Springer Nature, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6313-8_11

Reddy A A and Reddy G P. 2010. Supply side constraints in production of pulses in India: A case Study of Lentil. Agricultural Economics Research Review 23(1): 129–36.

Downloads

Submitted

2022-05-17

Published

2022-05-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

REDDY, A. A. ., MALIK, D. P. ., & DEVI, M. . (2022). Global status of lentil production with special reference to India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 92(4), 474-479. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i4.123972
Citation