Impact of moisture regimes on yield and soil microbial population in pea (Pisum sativum)

Authors

  • NEHA SINGHAL Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • MUKESH SIAG Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • POONAM SHARMA Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • RAKESH SHARDA Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • HARPINDER SINGH Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i5.124626

Keywords:

Dehydrogenase activity, Irrigation, Microbial population, Moisture, Pea, Yield

Abstract

Method of application of irrigation to the crop plays one of the most crucial roles in plant growth, development and overall production of the crop. To study the effect of different types of irrigation methods on the yield of the pea (Pisum sativum L. var. PB-89) crop, a field experiment was conducted at the research farm of the Punjab Agricultural University, in the winter of 2016–17 and 2017–18. Five treatments, viz. drip irrigation on crop grown on level field (T1), drip irrigation on crop grown on ridges (T2), flood irrigation (T3) and furrow irrigation (T4) all at 100% ET level and rainfed irrigation (T5) were compared. Each method of irrigation application had a unique soil moisture pattern during the crop growing period. Soil microbial properties were also studied for different treatments and although there was non-significant difference in microbial population among treatments, there was significant difference of biological
activity of the microbes with respect to different irrigation treatments, as reflected by the recorded dehydrogenase activity of the soil.  Population of microbes was maximum at flowering stage. Yield of the crop varied significantly with the method of irrigation used. Maximum yield was obtained under drip irrigation treatment 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alagawadi A R and Gaur A C. 1988. Associative effect of Rhizobium and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria on the yield and nutrient uptake of chickpea. Plant and Soil 105(2): 241–46.

Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D and Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration- Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper no.56, Rome.

Bicer B T, Kalender A Narin and Oakar Do-an. 2004. The effect of irrigation on spring-sown chickpea. Journal of Agronomy 3(3): 154–58.

Drenovsky R E, Vo D, Graham K J and Scow K M. 2004. Soil water content and organic carbon availability are major determinants of soil microbial community composition. Microbial Ecology 48: 424–30.

Elkoca Erdal, Kantar Faik and Sahin Fikrettin. 2008. Influence of nitrogen fixing and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the nodulation, plant growth and yield of chickpea. Journal of Plant Nutrition 31: 157–71.

FAOSTAT. 2018. retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/ en/#data/QC on 22/05/2018.

Kulathunga M R D L, De Silva S H S A and Sangakkara U R. 2008. Impact of soil moisture on growth, yields and nodulation of mungbean (Vigna radiata) growing in the yala season on non calcic brown soils. Tropical Agricultural Research 20: 395–99.

Maisiri N, Senzanje A, Rockstrom J and Twomlow S J. 2005. On farm evaluation of the effect of lowcost drip irrigation on water and crop productivity compared to conventional surface irrigation system. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 30: 783–91.

Manoj, Singh R K, Singh A N, Ram H and Prasad S R. 2014. Growth, yield attributes and quality of summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.) as influenced by nitrogen and irrigation levels. Annals of Agricultural Research 35(1): 47–53.

Phene C J and Howell T A. 1984. Soil sensor control of high frequency irrigation. Transactions of the ASABE 27: 392–96.

Schnurer J, Clarholm M, Bostrom S and Rosswall T. 1986. Effects of moisture on soil microorganisms and nematodes: A field experiment. Microbial Ecology 12: 217.

Serraj R, Sinclair T R and Purcell L A. 1999. Symbiotic N2 fixation response to drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 331: 143–55.

Singh H. 2016. ‘Impact of different irrigation methods on microbial activity in summer mungbean’, pp. 49–50. MSc thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. Retrieved from http:// krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810000368

Singhal N, Sharma P, Siag M, Sharda R and Cutting N G. 2018. Impact of different irrigation methods on microbial activity in chickpea crop. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7(07): 1921–30.

Singhal N, Sharma P, Sharda R, Siag M and Cutting N G. 2021. Assessment of growth parameters and yield of pea (Pisum sativum) under different irrigation methods. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(9): 108–11.

Steenwerth K L, Jackson L E, Caldero’n F J, Scow K M and Rolston D E. 2005. Response of microbial community composition and activity in Agricultural and grassland soils after simulated rainfall. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37: 2249–62.

Tabatabai M A. 1982. Soil enzymes. Methods of Analysis, part 2, 2nd edn, pp. 903-47. Page A L, Miller R H and Keeney D R (Eds). Agronomy. ASA, SSSA, Publisher, Madison, WI.

Yang J, Zhang J, Huang Z, Zhu Q and Wang L. 2000. Remobilization of carbon reserves is improved by controlled soil-drying during grain filling of wheat. Crop Science 40: 1645–55.

Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q and Wang W. 2001. Remobilization of carbon reserves in response to water deficit during grain filling of rice. Field Crop Research 71: 47–55.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGHAL, N. ., SIAG, M. ., SHARMA, P. ., SHARDA, R. ., & SINGH, H. . (2022). Impact of moisture regimes on yield and soil microbial population in pea (Pisum sativum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 92(5), 572-576. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i5.124626
Citation