Bio-efficacy of fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl mixture against weeds and its effect on productivity and profitability of soybean (Glycine max) in Central India
785 / 458
Keywords:
Fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl, Productivity, Soybean, Weeds, Weed control efficiencyAbstract
Grassy and broadleaf weeds are simultaneously growing in soybean (Glycine max L.) crop and there is a lack of herbicides to control all types of weeds in a soybean crop. Thus, a field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2017 and 2018 to evaluate efficacy of fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl mixture against weeds and consequent improvement in productivity of soybean. Bio-efficacy was evaluated with 10 weed control treatments comprising of 4-doses of fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl mixture (90+90, 110+110, 130+130 and 220+220 g/ha), alone application of imazethapyr (100 g/ha), market check – fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl (110 + 110 g/ha), combined application of imazethapyr + imazamox (35 + 35 g/ha) as early post-emergence, hand weeding twice at 15 and 30 DAS, weedfree and weedy-check, were laid-out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Application of premix fluazifop-p-butyl + fomesafen (130+130 g/ha) as early-post-emergence resulted in lower density, dry weight of all individual weeds with 99.2% weed control efficiency (WCE) and higher value of yield parameters and yield (2.01 t/ha) of soybean which was statistically at par with weed-free plots (2.04 t/ha). The higher dose of fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl (220+220 g/ha) was found effective against weeds but caused phytotoxicity to soybean crop and reduced seed yield marginally (1.98 t/ha). The fomesafen residues up to 130 g/ha dose were found below the detectable limit in the soil with zero per cent persistence at harvest. However, the highest dose of fomesafen (220 g/ha) resulted in residues in soil (0.016 μg/g) with 4.44% persistence and half-life of 13 days. These results suggested that premix
fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl at 130+130 g/ha as early-post-emergence can be safe for the application in soybean crop.
Downloads
References
Bhimwal J P, Verma A, Nepalia V and Gupta V. 2019. Bio-efficacy of different tank mix herbicides for weed control in soybean. Legume Research-An International Journal 42(3): 416–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4009
Bineet M, Anda G and Mohamed T A. 2001. Herbicide mixture in agriculture: A review. (In) Proceeding of Biennial Conference, Indian Society of Weed Science, Bangalore, 23–24 May 2001, pp. 236.
Cobucci T, Prates H T, Falcao C L M and Rezende M M V. 1998. Effect of imazamox, fomesafen and acifluorfen soil residue on rotational crops. Weed Science 46(2): 258–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500090500
Dass A, Dey Debjani, Lal S K and Rajanna G A. 2019. Tank-mix insecticide and herbicide application effects on weeds, insect-pest menace and soybean productivity in semi-arid northern plains of India. Legume Research 42(3): 385–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-3855
Johnson D H and Talbert R E. 1993. Imazaquin, chlorimuron, and fomesafen may injure rotational vegetables and sunflower. Weed Technology 7: 573–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00037362
Kadam S P, Gokhale D N, Pawar S U and Chavan R M. 2018. Efficacy of post-emergence herbicides in soybean. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(6): 456–58.
Kashyap A K, Kushwaha H S and Mishra H. 2022. Influence of weed management processes on weeds, yield and production efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Annals of Agricultural Research, New Series 43(3): 286–92.
Lal S, Kewat M L and Suryavanshi T. 2017. Weed indices are influenced by propaquizafop and imazethapyr mixture in soybean. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(8): 3109–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.372
Lodha G. 2018. ‘Evaluation of post-emergence herbicides against weeds in soybean’. M.Sc. Thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, pp. 63–64.
Malik R S, Yadav A and Malik R K. 2006. Integrated weed management in soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 38(1–2): 65–68.
Oliveira M C, Feist D, Eskelsen S, Scott J E and Knezevic S Z. 2017. Weed control in soybean with pre-emergence and post-emergence applied herbicides. Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management 3(1): 40–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2016.05.0040
Pratap V, Verma S K and Dass A. 2023. Weed growth, nutrient removal and yield of direct-seeded rice as influenced by establishment methods and chemical-cum-mechanical weed management practices. Crop Protection 163: 106100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2022.106100
Pundas, Shrivastava G K and Ratre R. 2018a. Bio-efficacy and phyto-toxicity of new herbicides against weeds in soybean. International Journal of Chemical Studies 6(2): 1815–23.
Pundas, Shrivastava G K, Thakur C L and Jangde S. 2018b. Effect of new herbicides on yield attributes and yields of soybean. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7(2): 1572–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.189
Shah M H and Pramanik K. 2020. Bio-efficacy of herbicides weed management in groundnut under lateritic soil of West Bengal. Journal of Crop and Weed 16(1): 199–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2020.v16.i1.1294
Singh D, Mir N H, Singh N and Kumar J. 2014. Promising early post-emergence herbicides for effective weed management in soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 46(2): 135–37.
Singh S P, Rawal S, Dua V K and Sharma S K. 2017. Weed control efficiency of herbicide sulfosulfuron in potato crop. Potato Journal 44(2): 110–16.
Soltani N, Shropshire C and Sikkema P H. 2017. Sensitivity of adzuki bean to acifluorfen, fomesafen, bentazon, imazethapyr and halosulfuron-methyl applied post-emergence. American Journal of Plant Sciences 8: 1092–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.85072
Yadav S L, Singh P, Dhaked U, Yadav G N, Jadon C K, Singh K, Yadav R K, Meena H, Yadav R, Samota S D and Yadav D L. 2022. Bioefficacy evaluation of new generation post emergence herbicides in Urdbean in vertisols under South Eastern Rajasthan. The Pharma Innovation Journal 11(9): 1101–04.
Zandona R R, Agostinetto D, Silva B M, Ruchel Q and Fraga D S. 2018. Interference periods in soybean crop as affected by emergence times of weeds. Planta Daninha 36: e018169361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100045
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.