The Planter performance under varied seed rate and nutrient management in chickpea (Cicer arietinum)


Abstract views: 79 / PDF downloads: 139

Authors

  • KARTHIKA M Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030, India
  • K BHANU REKHA Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030, India
  • K S SUDHAKAR Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030, India
  • P RAJAIAH Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030, India
  • A MADHAVI Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030, India
  • S TRIVENI Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i12.132074

Keywords:

Chickpea, Energy indicators, Input-use, Multiple indices, Yield

Abstract

A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2020–21 and 2021–22 at Agricultural Research Institute, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, Telangana to evaluate planter performance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Experiment was laid in split plot design with 4 seed rates (52, 70, 77 and 105 kg/ha) with corresponding two inter and intra row spacings (30, 40 and 7.5, 10 cm) in main plots and 7 nutrient management treatments in sub plots, viz. Absolute control, 75, 100, 125% RDF, 75% RDF + Microbial consortia (MC) – Azotobacter + Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria + Potassium releasing bacteria + Zinc solubilizing bacteria (5 kg/ha), 100% RDF + MC and 125% RDF+MC. Results revealed that miss and multiple indices were 11.31 and 10.25 and 4.89 and 4.51% for 10 cm spacing and 7.21 and 6.00 and 5.12 and 5.19% for 7.5 cm spacing during 2020–21 and 2021–22. Higher energy use efficiency (4.64), energy intensiveness (1.61 MJ/₹), net energy benefit (58106.4 MJ/ha) and energy efficiency ratio (2.37) were with 105 kg/ha seed rate and higher specific energy (8.91 MJ/ha) was with 52 kg /ha. Among nutrient management, highest energy use efficiency (4.98) and energy efficiency ratio were with absolute control while, 125% RDF + MC resulted in higher energy intensiveness (1.61 MJ/₹) and net energy benefit (54365.1 MJ/ha). Higher specific energy and agro-chemical energy ratio was with 75% RDF (7.94 MJ/ha) and 125% RDF (0.48). Among seed rate, yield (seed and haulm) and energy indices were highest with 105 kg/ ha and among nutrient management, highest yield and energy indices were with 125% RDF + MC but, on par with 100% RDF + MC and 125% RDF treatments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akcaoz H, Ozcatalbas O and Kizilay H. 2009. Analysis of energy use for pomegranate production in Turkey. Journal of Food and Agricultural Environment 7(2): 475–80.

Bhardwaj S. 2014. Mechanization of chickpea production in Andhra Pradesh: Meso and micro level analysis. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics.

Bozdogan A M. 2008. Seeding uniformity for vacuum precision seeders. Scientia Agricola 65(3): 318–22.

Bracy R P, Parish R L and Coy J E. 1999. Precision seeder uniformity varies with theoretical spacing. Horticulture Technology 9: 47–50.

Deva S and Kolhe S S. 2018. Nutrient and weed management practices effect on growth, nodulation, yield, economics and energetic of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies 5(6): 38–44.

Devasenapathy P, Senthilkumar G and Shanmugam P M. 2009. Energy management in crop production. Indian Journal of Agronomy 54(1): 80–90.

Dhimate A S, Dogra B, Dogra R, Reddy S, Srinivas I and Adake R V. 2018. Mechanization in chickpea cultivation- Current scenario and Scope. Agriculture Update 42(3): 1–11.

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. An International Rice Research Institute Book. A Wiley-Inter-Science Publication, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Katchman D S and Smith J A. 1995. Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planters using single seed metering. Transactions of the ASAE 38: 379–87.

Kepner R A, Roy Bainer and Barger E L. 1978. Principles of Farm Machinery. AVI Publishing Company, Inc. Westport, Connecticut.

Khan S, Khan M A, Hanjra M A and Mu J. 2009. Pathways to reduce the environmental footprints of water and energy input in food production. Food policy 34: 141–49.

Kitani O. 1999. CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering. ASAE Publications, St. Joseph.

Kizilaslan H. 2009. Input–output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat Province of Turkey. Applied Energy 86: 1354–58.

Kumar T M A. 2019. ‘Design and development of planter for tuberose and gladiolus crops and its performance evaluation under field condition’. PhD Thesis. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand.

Mangal M Q, Mahmood Hemat, Llah Habibu, Hamayoun Sayed, Rahim Ghafari and Mohammad Naim Jalali. 2017. Response of maize varieties under variable planting geometry in Kandahar semi- arid situation. International Journal of Applied Research 3(10): 74–78.

Mohammadi A and Omid M. 2010. Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy 87: 191–96.

Moradi M, Nematollahi A, Mousavikhaneghah A M, Pishgar- Komleh S and Rajabi M R. 2018. Comparison of energy consumption of wheat production in conservation and conventional agriculture using EDA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3424-x Morteza, Taki Hassan, Ghasemi Mobtaker and Nasim Monjezi. 2012. Energy input –output modeling and economical analyze for corn grain production in Iran. Elixir International Journal 52: 11500–05.

Nassiri S M and Singh S. 2009. Study on energy use efficiency for paddy crop using data envelopment analysis (DEA) Technique. Applied Energy 86: 1320–25.

Patil S L and Ramesha M N. 2017. Impact of improved production technologies on chickpea yields, economics and energy use in rainfed Vertisols. Legume Research: 1–8.

Patil S L, Loganandhan N, Ramesha M N, Adhikary P P and Channabasappa K. 2016. Energy consumption and sensitivity analysis of rainfed chickpea production in Vertisols of semi- arid Karnataka. Proceeding of National Academy of Sciences, India, Section B Biological. Science.

Patil S B, Mansur C P, Gaur P M, Salankinkop S R and Alagundagi S C. 2021. Planting density affected dry matter production, partitioning, and yield in machine harvestable chickpea genotypes in the irrigated ecosystem. International Journal of Plant Production 15: 29–43.

Priya R R, Krishnan R, Srinivasan K and Shanmugasundaram S. 2019. Energy production, consumption and yield of maize under different planting density and fertilizer levels. Environment and Ecology 37(3A): 881–85.

Sahay J. 2010a. Elements of Agricultural Engineering. 4th edn, pp. 283–84. Standard Publishers Distributors.

Sahay J. 2010b. Elements of Agricultural Engineering. 4th edn, pp. 234. Standard Publishers Distributors.

Sangma A S and Changade N M. 2020. Different fertilizer dose and biofertilizer inoculation’s effect on N, P and K content and uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine 7(7): 2340–48.

Sarkar D, Sankar A, Devika O S, Singh S, Parihar M, Rakshit A, Sayyed R Z, Gafur A, Ansari M J, Danish S and Fahad S. 2021. Optimizing nutrient use efficiency, productivity, energetics, and economics of red cabbage following mineral fertilization and biopriming with compatible rhizosphere microbes. Scientific reports 11(1): 1–14.

Shilpa P C, Mundinamani S M and Rudrapur S. 2017. Comparative economic analysis of chickpea cultivation in mechanized and non-mechanized farms of India. Agriculture Update 12(3): 770–76.

Singh M K, Kumar N, Verm P and Garg S K. 2012. Performance evaluation of mechanical planters for planting of chickpea and pigeonpea. Journal of Food Legumes 25(2): 131–34.

Soni P, Sinha R and Perret S R. 2018. Energy use and efficiency in selected rice-based cropping systems of the middle-Indo gangetic plains in India. Energy reports (4): 554–64.

Sujathamma P and Babu D V. 2019. Standardization of seed rate for mechanical sowing of newly released varieties of chickpea. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8(2): 1719–24.

Taheri Garav A, Asakereh A and Haghani K. 2010. Energy elevation and economic analysis of canola production in Iran a case study: Mazandaran province. International Journal of Environmental Sciences 1(2): 236–43.

Thyagaraj C R. 2012. Enhancing energy use efficiency through conservation agriculture. ICAR sponsored training course on Conservation Agriculture Strategies for Resource Conservation and Mitigation of Climate Change, CRIDA Hyderabad, September 24–30, pp. 229–40.

Tzilivakis J, Warner D J, May M, Lewis K A and Jaggard K. 2005. An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emission in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK. Agricultural Systems 85: 101–19.

Yousefi M and Damghani A M. 2012. Evaluation of energy flow and indicators of chickpea under rainfed condition in Iran. International. Journal of Farm and Allied Sciences 1(2): 57–61.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-01-06

Published

2023-12-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

M, K. ., REKHA, K. B. ., SUDHAKAR, K. S. ., RAJAIAH, P. ., MADHAVI, A. ., & TRIVENI, S. . (2023). The Planter performance under varied seed rate and nutrient management in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93(12), 1350–1355. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i12.132074
Citation