Response of the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) to attractant traps in Robusta coffee plantations

JIMMY RIMBING; REITY ENGKA; SHERLIJ DUMALANG; FRANGKY RORONG

doi:10.56093/ijas.v93i5.133017

Authors

JIMMY RIMBING Faculty of Agriculture, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia
REITY ENGKA Faculty of Agriculture, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6997-2121
SHERLIJ DUMALANG Faculty of Agriculture, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3260-9908
FRANGKY RORONG Faculty of Agriculture, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-8249

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i5.133017

Keywords:

Attractants, Coffee berry borer, Robusta, Traps

Abstract

Coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari , is a big challenge for farmers worldwide. The CBB life cycle may be found in coffee beans, making attractant traps an effective management method. Furthermore, during 2021 and 2022, the attractant traps were used to examine the effect on population density in Robusta coffee plantations. The treatment consisted of Cap Tikus ethanol (local), methanol, and a mixture of Cap Tikus ethanol-methanol. The results showed that all three traps could attract female beetles, and the highest CBB population caught was in 2021. A significant mixture towards the population was 68.15±60.42 CBB/trap/7 days and 35.75±8.39 CBB/trap/7 days in 2021 and 2022. The lowest fluctuation population of beetles caught was in Cap Tikus ethanol. The population was low at the first 7 days of observation, then increased at 21 and 28 days in 2021 (418–532 CBB/7 days) and 2022 (194–294
CBB/7 days). Furthermore, the high rainfall and rainy days negatively affect the caught beetles’ population. Based on the results, the attractant traps are a method to monitor and control CBB in coffee plants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristizábal L F, Bustillo A E and Arthurs S P. 2016. Integrated pest management of coffee berry borer: Strategies from Latin America that could be useful for coffee farmers in Hawaii. Insects 7: 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/insects7010006

Castro A M, Tapias J, Ortiz A, Benavides P, Góngora C E. 2017. Identification of attractant and repellent plants to coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 164(2): 120–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12604

Dayantolis W, Ripaldi A and Supeni A. 2016. Determination of climatological normal of rainy season in Indonesia based on decadal rainfall frequency. Megasains 7(1): 25–32.

De Sausa M S, Costa J N M, Espindula M C and Silva A A. 2018. Response of Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to semiochemicals and blends using baited traps in coffee fields. Australian Journal Crop Science 12(6): 961–66 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.18.12.06.PNE1057

Dos-Santosa C A A, Trevisan H, De-carvalho A G, Plata-Rueda A, Zanuncioa J C and De-Sauzac T S. 2022. Increased capture efficiency of Scolytinae with modified semi-funnel trap model. Brazilian Journal of Biology 84: e259131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.259131

Dufour B P and Frerot B. 2008. Optimization of coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (Col., Scolytidae), mass trapping with an attractant mixture. Journal of Applied Entomology 132: 591–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01291.x

Erfandari O, Hamdani and Supriyatdi D. 2019. Diversity of intensity of pest attack coffee borrer (Hypothenemus Hampei Ferrari) on some of robusta coffee production center in Lampung Province. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan 17(3): 250–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v19i3.1523

Jaramillo J, Torto B, Mwenda D, Troeger A and Borgemeister C. 2013. Coffee berry borer joins bark beetles coffee klatch. Plos ONE 8: e74277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074277

Johnson M A and Manoukis N C. 2021. Influence of seasonal and climatic variables on coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari) flight activity in Hawaii. PLoS ONE 16(12): e0257861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257861

Margina F L, Kilambo D L, Maerere A P and Teri M. 2016. Innovative strategies for control of coffee insect pests in Tanzania. African Journals Online 22(1): 1–9.

Mathieu F, Brun LO, Marcillaud C and Frerot B. 1997. Trapping of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei Ferr. (Col. Scolytidae) within a mesh-enclosed environment: Interaction of olfactory and visual stimuli. Journal of Applied Entomology 121: 181–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1997.tb01390.x

Njihia T N, Jaramillo J, Murungi L, Mwenda D, Orindi B, Poehling H M and Torto B. 2014. Spiroacetals in the colonization behaviour of the coffee berry borer: A ‘push-pull’ system. PLoS ONE 9: e111316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111316

Pereira A E, Vilela Evaldo F, Tinoco R S, de Lima Oscar J, Fantine A K, Morais E G F and Franca C F M. 2012. Correlation between numbers captured and infestation levels of the coffee berry-borer, Hypothenemus hampei: A preliminary basis for an action threshold using baited traps. International Journal of Pest Management 58(2): 183–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2012.676219

Prakoswo D, Ariffin and Tyasmoro S Y. 2018. The analyze of agroclimate in ub forest area malang district, east Java, Indonesia. Bioscience Research 15(2): 918–23.

Rasiska S, Ariyono D and Widiantini F. 2016. Potency of distilled water of several parts of coffee plant as attractant of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei Ferr.) in laboratory. Jurnal Agrikultura 27(2): 112–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/agrikultura.v27i2.11203

Rostaman and Prakoso B. 2019. Response of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) to alcohol-based attractants on coffee crops in Banjarnegara, Indonesia. Advances in Biological Sciences Research 8: 25–28.

Sanguansuba S, Buranapanichpan S, Beaverc Roger A, Saowaphak T, Tanaka N and Kamata N. 2020. Influence of seasonality and climate on captures of wood-boring Coleoptera (Bostrichidae and Curculionidae (Scolytinae and Platypodinae)) using ethanol-baited traps in a seasonal tropical forest of northern Thailand. Journal of Forest Research 25(4): 223–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2020.1786897

Shi P, Zhong L, Sandhu H S, Ge F, Xu X and Chen W. 2011. Population decrease of Scirpophaga incertulas Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) under climate warming. Ecology and Evolution 2(1): 58–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.69

Sihaloho M R. 2019. Height and attractant traps tests to control the coffee berry borers (Hypothenemus hampei Ferr) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Tanjung Beringin, Dair Regency. Universitas Sumatera Utara. Indonesia.

Sinaga K M, Bakti D and Iskandar M. 2015. Pinem test of height and type of trap to control berry borrer (Hypothenemus hampei Ferr.) in Pearung village, Sub-district Paranginan, District Humbang Hasundutan. Online Journal of Agroecotechnology 3(3): 829–36.

Silva F C, Ventura M U and Morales L. 2006. Capture of Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in response to trap characteristics. Journal of Science Agriculture 63(6): 567–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000600010

Silva W D, Mascarin G M, Romagnoli E M and Bento J M S. 2012. Mating behavior of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Journal of Insect Behavior 25: 408–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-011-9314-4

Silva C O, Trevisan H, Souza T S and Carvalho A G. 2020. Occurrence of Scolytinae in mangrove with impact trap and in wood of five forest species. Bioscience Journal 36 (1): 256–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-47920

Uemura-lima D H, Ventura M U, Mikami A Y, Silva F C and Morales L. 2010. Ecology, behavior and bionomics: Responses of coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei Ferr. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to vertical distribution of methanol. Neotropical Entomology 39(6): 930–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2010000600013

Wermelinger B, Rigling A, Mathis D S, Kenis M and Gossner M M. 2021. Climate change effects on trophic interactions of bark beetles in Inner alpine scots pine forests. Forests 12: 136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020136

Wiryadiputra S, Cilas C and Morin J P. 2008. Effectiveness of the brocap trap in controlling the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei Ferr.) in Indonesia [PA589], ASIC, Montpellier, France.

Wiryadiputra S. 2012. Effectiveness cyantraniliprole against coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) on arabica coffee. Pelita Perkebunan 28(2): 100–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22302/iccri.jur.pelitaperkebunan.v28i2.203