Productivity and profitability of drip fertigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) – mungbean (Vigna radiata) – maize (Zea mays) cropping system


Abstract views: 175 / PDF downloads: 242

Authors

  • DIANA DHAYAL ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • KHAJANCHI LAL ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • VINAY KUMAR SINDHU Centre for Water Technology and Management, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab
  • MANOJ KHANNA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • SUSAMA SUDHISHRI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • MAN SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • R BHATTACHARYYA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • K G ROSIN ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • D CHAKRABORTY ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i3.133361

Keywords:

Benefit cost ratio, Cropping system, Economic viability, Sub-surface drip, Water use efficiency

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at the research farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
during 2019–20 and 2020–21 to study the productivity and economic viability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–
mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek)–maize (Zea mays L.) fertigated with 0, 60, 80, 100% recommended doses
of NPK and irrigated at 0.6 and 0.8 crop evapotranspiration (ETc) through subsurface (SSDI) and surface drip irrigation (SDI). The results were compared with the conventional practice of surface irrigation and soil application of 100% recommended doses of NPK. Grain yields of wheat, mungbean, maize and system wheat equivalent yield (SWEY) improved by 22.9, 7.2, 21.9 and 19.4%, respectively with increase in NPK fertigation doses from 60 to 100% and by 15.6, 9.2, 4.9 and 9.7% with the increase in irrigation frequency from 0.6 to 0.8 ETc. However, SDI and SSDI had equal system productivity (12.48 and 12.85 Mg/ha). The SWEY at 0.8ETc fertigated either with NPK80 or NPK100
was statistically at par (14.2–15.9 Mg/ha) with the conventional practice (14.3–15.2 Mg/ha). The cash inflow, net
income and benefit cost ratio (BCR) of the cropping system also increased successively with increase in fertigation
doses and irrigation frequency. The net income and BCR followed the order maize>wheat>mungbean. The net income under SSDI at 0.8 ETc with NPK80 or NPK100 in wheat, mungbean, maize and system was 11–13, 88–105, 1-9 and 8–14% higher than the conventional practice. At 0.8 ETc and NPK100, BCR in SSDI (1.86) was higher than in SDI
(1.71) and conventional system (1.67). 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brar A S, Buttar G S and Vashist K K. 2019. Enhancing crop and water productivity of spring maize (Zea mays) through drip fertigation. Indian Journal of Agronomy 64(1): 87–92.

Brar A S, Kaur K, Sindhu V K, Tsolakis N and Srai J S. 2022. Sustainable water use through multiple cropping systems and precision irrigation. Journal of Cleaner Production 333: 130117. doi: 10.1016/Jjclepro.130117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130117

Chen R, Cheng W, Liao J, Fan H, zheng z and Ma F. 2015. Lateral spacing in drip irrigated wheat: the effects on soil moisture, yield, and water use efficiency. Field Crops Research 179: 52–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.021

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). AQUASTAT Database. 2012. http://www.fao.org/nr/aquastat Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edn, 680 pp. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Kishore P, Chand S and Srivastava S K. 2022. Potential area of micro-irrigation and its outreach across Indian states. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 92(9): 1056–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i9.101138

Malve S H, Rao P and Dhake A. 2017. Impact of drip irrigation and N-fertigation scheduling on wheat (Triticum aestivum) under semi-arid tropical environment. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87: 580–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70091

Michael A M. 2007. Economic evaluation of irrigation projects and water pricing policy. Irrigation: Theory and Practice, pp. 695–24. Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd, Noida.

Parashar G, Singh D and Jat B L. 2017. Drip fertigation study in spring maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agricultural Engineering 10(2): 379–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAE/10.2/379-400

Patra K, Parihar C M, Nayak H S, Rana B, Singh V K, Krishnan P, Pandey R, Mandal B N, Rathi N, Meena B R, Singh L K, Sidhu H S and Jat M L. 2021. Crop performance and nitrogen use-efficiency in maize under conservation agriculture coupled with sub-surface drip fertigation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(3): 474–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i3.112544

Pramanik S, Tripathi S K, Ray R and Banerjee H. 2014. Economic evaluation of drip fertigation system in banana cv. Martaman (AAB, Silk) cultivation in new alluvium zone of West Bengal. Agricultural Economics Research Review 27(1): 103–09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0974-0279.27.1.009

Qin W, Assinck F B T, Heinen M and Oenema O. 2016. Water and nitrogen use efficiencies in citrus production: a meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 222: 103–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.052

Rana B, Parihar C M, Nayak H S, Patra K, Singh V K, Krishnan P, Pandey R, Rathi N, Meena B R, Kumar A, Gupta N, Sidhu H S and Jat M L. 2021. Optimization of N dose in rice under conservation agriculture with sub-surface drip fertigation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(4): 509–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i4.112625

Sandhu O S, Gupta R K, Thind H S, Jat M L, Sidhu H S and Singh Y. 2019. Drip irrigation and nitrogen management for improving crop yields on nitrogen use efficiency and water productivity of maize-wheat system on permanent beds in north-west India. Agricultural Water Management 219: 19–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.040

Sharma R, Kumar D S and Brar A S. 2021. Effect of drip-fertigation levels on gobhi sarson (Brassica napus) performance under Punjab conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(8): 1251–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i8.115887

Si z Y, zain M, Mehmood F, Wang G S, Gao Y and Duan A W. 2020. Effects of nitrogen application rate and irrigation regime on growth, yield, and water-nitrogen use efficiency of drip- irrigated winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management 231: 106002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106002

Singhal N, Sharma P, Sharda R, Siag M and Cutting N G. 2021. Assessment of growth parameters and yield of pea (Pisum sativum) under different irrigation methods. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(9): 1378–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i9.116093

Downloads

Submitted

2023-02-16

Published

2023-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DHAYAL, D., LAL, K., SINDHU, V. K., KHANNA, M., SUDHISHRI, S., SINGH, M., BHATTACHARYYA, R., ROSIN, K. G., & CHAKRABORTY, D. (2023). Productivity and profitability of drip fertigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) – mungbean (Vigna radiata) – maize (Zea mays) cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93(3), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i3.133361
Citation