Zinc uptake in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under the influence of microbial consortia (Pusa decomposer) mediatedin situ rice straw management options


Abstract views: 208 / PDF downloads: 198

Authors

  • S M MANU ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • Y V SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • Y S SHIVAY ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • KAPILA SHEKHAWAT ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • V K SHARMA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • NAMITA DAS SAHA ICAR-Central Tobacco Research Institute, Dinhata, West Bengal image/svg+xml
  • GOVINDARAJ KAMALAM DINESH SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, Baburayanpettai, Tamil Nadu

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i5.141843

Keywords:

Aerobic rice, Paddy straw, Pusa decomposer, Wheat, Zinc uptake

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) and winter (rabi) seasons of 2019–20 and 2020–21 at research farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to study the effect of various crop establishment methods and microbial consortia (Pusa decomposer) mediated in situ rice straw management options on zinc (Zn) concentration and uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) (cv. Pusa Basmati 1509) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (cv. HD 2967). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design (SPD) with 3 replications having 2 main plot (main factor) treatments, viz. aerobic rice (AR); and conventional transplanted (CT) rice in wet season; and 7 sub- plot (sub-factor) treatments, viz. Clean cultivation (removal of paddy straw); Paddy straw incorporation (PSI); Paddy straw mulching (PSM); PSI + Pusa decomposer (PD); PSM + PD; PSI + urea @20 kg/ha; and PSI + PD + urea @10 kg/ha in dry season. Findings showed that, in rice the zinc concentration (18.51 and 20.30 mg/kg in grain; 57.02 and 57.81 mg/kg in straw) and uptake (78.38 and 89.81 g/ha in grain; 427.1 and 434.6 g/ha in straw) were significantly superior in CT rice than AR in main plots during both the years of experiments. However, sub-plot treatments were non-significant in the zinc concentration and uptake. In wheat, among in situ rice straw management options (sub- plots), paddy straw incorporation + Pusa decomposer + Urea @10 kg/ha treatment significantly resulted in higher Zn concentration (38.08 and 39.03 mg/kg in grain; 28.24 and 29.01 mg/kg in straw) and uptake (185.0 and 191.9 g/ha in grain; 234.2 and 242.6 g/ha in straw) compared to other treatments and control (clean cultivation). The principal component analysis revealed that Zn uptake positively correlated with straw and grain yields in rice and wheat. Thus, the same treatment was found to be a better option for higher Zn concentration and uptake in the rice-wheat cropping system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almagro M, Ruiz-Navarro A, Diaz-Pereira E, Albaladejo J and Martinez-Mena M. 2021. Plant residue chemical quality modulates the soil microbial response related to decomposition and soil organic carbon and nitrogen stabilization in a rainfed mediterranean agroecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 156: 108198.

Cardoen D, Joshi P, Diels L, Sarma P M and Pant D. 2015. Agriculture biomass in India, part-1: Estimation and characterization. Resource Conservation and Recycling 102: 39–48.

Choudhary A K, Sood P, Rahi and Tyagi V. 2022. Rice productivity, Zn biofortification, and nutrient-use efficiency as influenced by Zn fertilization under conventional transplanted rice and the system of rice intensification. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10: 869194.

Dhaliwal S S, Sharma V, Shukla A K, Verma V, Kaur M, Shivay Y S and Hossain A. 2022. Biofortification-A frontier novel approach to enrich micronutrients in field crops to encounter the nutritional security. Molecules 27(4): 1340.

Dinesh G K, Sharma D K, Jat S L, Bandyopadhyay K K, Srinivasa Rao C, Venkatramanan V, Kadam P V, Sinduja M, Sathya V, Sethupathi N and Bhatia A. 2023. Effect of conservation agriculture practices on carbon pools in a sandy loam soil of Indo-Gangetic plains. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 54(20): 2845–862.

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, pp. 76–83. A Willey Inter Science Publication, New York, USA.

Goswami S B, Mondal R and Mandi S K. 2020. Crop residue management options in rice-rice system: A review. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 66(9): 1218–234.

Manu S M, Singh Y V, Shivay Y S, Shukla L, Sharma V K, Saha N D, Shekhawat K, Bandopadhyay K K and Gouda H S. 2023. Nitrogen budgeting under the influence of in situ rice residue management options in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 93(2): 151–56.

Meena R K. 2015. ‘Effect of residue and nitrogen management on productivity and soil health in aerobic Basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system’. PhD Thesis, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Paul L C, Suman AA and Sultan N. 2013. Methodological analysis of principal component analysis (PCA) method. International Journal of Computational Engineering and Management 16(2): 32–38.

Prasad R, Shivay Y S, Kumar D and Sharma S N. 2006. Learning by Doing Exercises in Soil Fertility: A Practical Manual for Soil Fertility, pp. 68. Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Prasad R and Shivay Y S. 2018. Relative grain zinc loading ability of cereals (rice, wheat, maize) and a grain legume (chickpea). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(2): 307–13.

Ravindra K, Singh T and Mor S. 2019. Emissions of air pollutants from primary crop residue burning in India and their mitigation strategies for cleaner emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production 208: 261–73.

R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

Saini S and Kaur M. 2021. Nitrogen and rice straw incorporation impact Zn fractions and wheat yield in rice-wheat system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(4): 619–23.

Sandhu P S, Walia S S, Gill R S and Dheri G S. 2020. Thirty-one years study of integrated nutrient management on physico- chemical properties of soil under rice-wheat cropping system. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 51(12): 1641–657.

Saurabh K, Rao K K, Mishra J S, Kumar R, Poonia S P, Samal S K, Roy H S, Dubey A K, Choubey A K, Mondal S and Bhatt B P. 2021. Influence of tillage-based crop establishment and residue management practices on soil quality indices and yield sustainability in rice-wheat cropping system of eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil and Tillage Research 206: 104841.

Yadvinder S, Bijay S and Timsina J. 2005. Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-based cropping systems in the tropics. Advances in Agronomy 85: 269–407.

Suganya A, Saravanan A and Manivannan N. 2020. Role of zinc nutrition for increasing zinc availability, uptake, yield, and quality of maize (Zea mays L.) grains: An overview. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 51(15): 2001–021.

Tuiwong P, Lordkaew S and Prom-u-thai C. 2021. Improving grain zinc concentration in wetland and upland rice varieties grown under waterlogged and well-drained soils by applying zinc fertilizer. Agronomy 11(3): 554.

Yadvinder S, Bijay S and Timsina J. 2005. Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-based cropping systems in the tropics. Advances in Agronomy 85: 269–407.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-09-02

Published

2024-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MANU, S. M. ., SINGH, Y. V. ., SHIVAY, Y. S. ., SHEKHAWAT, K. ., SHARMA, V. K. ., SAHA, N. D. ., & DINESH, G. K. . (2024). Zinc uptake in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under the influence of microbial consortia (Pusa decomposer) mediatedin situ rice straw management options. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 94(5), 478–483. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i5.141843
Citation