Impact of India’s farm science centers (Krishi Vigyan Kendras) on farm households’ economic welfare: An evidence from a national farmers’ survey

ANJANI  KUMAR; A K  MISHRA; A K  SINGH; SUNIL  SAROJ; MISHA MADHAVAN  M; P K  JOSHI

doi:10.56093/ijas.v94i3.148771

Authors

ANJANI KUMAR South Asia Office of the International Food Policy Research Institute, NASC Complex, New Delhi
A K MISHRA Kemper and Ethel Marley Foundation Chair, Morrison School of Agribusiness, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona, USA
A K SINGH Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh; 4ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
SUNIL SAROJ South Asia Office of the International Food Policy Research Institute, NASC Complex, New Delhi
MISHA MADHAVAN M ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
P K JOSHI South Asia Office of the International Food Policy Research Institute, NASC Complex, New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i3.148771

Keywords:

Agricultural households, Benefit-cost ratio, Economic welfare, Farm science centers (Krishi Vigyan Kendras), Farmers

Abstract

This study examines the impact of access to India’s farm science centers (Krishi Vigyan Kendras, or KVKs) on agricultural households’ welfare using household data from the nationally representative Situation Assessment Survey of Agricultural Households conducted by India’s National Sample Survey Office in 2013. Employing different matching techniques and endogenous switching regression models, it was observed that the KVKs have a positive and statistically significant impact on agricultural households’ economic welfare, although, that impact is heterogeneous. Further, the investments made in expansion of India’s network of KVKs have been quite remunerative, as the benefit- to-cost ratio of expenditure on KVKs ranges from 8–12. Moreover, present findings suggest that expanding rural formal credit markets and promoting literacy can maximize the potential impact of KVKs on agricultural households’ economic welfare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akobundu E J, Alwang A, Essel G, Norton W and A Tegene. 2004. Does extension work? Impacts of a programme to assist limited-resource farmers in Virginia. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 26(3): 361–72.

Arouri M, C Nguyen and A B Youssef. 2015. Natural disasters, household welfare, and resilience: Evidence from rural Vietnam. World Development 70: 59–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.017

Babu S and P K Joshi. 2019. Agricultural Extension Reforms in South Asia: Status, Challenges and Policy Options. Suresh C, Babu and P K Joshi (Eds). Academic Press. Paperback ISBN: 9780128187524

Bathla S, P K Joshi and A Kumar. 2017. Revisiting investments and subsidies to accelerate agricultural income and alleviate rural poverty in India. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper 01701, Washington D C.

Benin S, E Nkonya, G Okecho, J Randriamamonjy, E Kato, G Lubade and M Kyotalimye. 2011. Returns to spending on agricultural extension: The case of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) programme of Uganda. Agricultural Economics 42(2): 249–67.

Carter D W and J W Milon. 2005. Price knowledge in household demand for utility services. Land Economics 81(2): 265–83.

Cawley A, O’Donoghue C, Heanue K, Hilliard R and M Sheehan. 2018. The impact of extension services on farm level income: An instrumental variable approach to combat endogeneity. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 1–28.

Davis K, Nkonya E, Kato E Mekonnen, D A, Odendo M, Miiro R and J Nkuba. 2012. Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural productivity and poverty in east Africa. World Development 40(2): 402–13.

Fan S, A Gulati and S Thorat. 2008. Investment, subsidies, and pro-poor growth in rural India. Agricultural Economics 39(2): 163–70.

Feder G, L J Lau and R H Slade. 1987. Does agricultural extension pay? The training and visit system in north-west India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69: 677–86.

Heckman J J, J L Tobias and E J Vytlacil. 2001. Four parameters of interest in the evaluation of social programmes. Southern Economic Journal 68(2): 210–33.

Imbens G W and J M Wooldridge. 2009. Recent developments in the econometrics of programme development. Journal of Economic Literature 47(1): 5–86.

Joshi P K, P Kumar and S Parappurathu. 2015. Public investment in agricultural research and extension in India. European Journal of Development Research 27: 438–51.

Kumar A, A K Mishra, S Saroj and P K Joshi. 2017. Institutional versus non-institutional credit to agricultural households in India: Evidence on impact from a National Farmers’ Survey. Economic Systems 41: 420–32.

Kumar A, S Saroj, H Takeshima and P K Joshi. 2018. Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from a panel data analysis of smallholder dairy farmers in Bihar, India. Food Policy 75: 24–36.

Li X, C Gan and B Hu. 2011. The welfare impact of microcredit on rural households in China. Journal of Socio-economics 40(4): 404–11. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2011.04.012

Maddala G S and F D Nelson. 1975. Switching regression models with exogenous and endogenous switching. (In) Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Washington, DC: Business and Economics Section, Vol. 5, pp. 423–26.

NILERD (National Institute of Labour Economics Research and Development). 2015. KVKs : Impact on dissemination of improved practices and technologies. Indian Council of Agricultural Research–sponsored project report. http://iamrindia.gov.in/writereaddata/uploadfile/kvk0final0report020150december022_1648.pdf

O’Donoghue C and T Hennessy. 2015. Policy and economic change in the agri-food sector in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review 46: 315–37.

Verhofstadt E and M Maertens. 2014. Can Agricultural Cooperatives Reduce Poverty? Heterogeneous impact of cooperative membership on farmer’s welfare in Rwanda. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 37(1): 86–106.

Wooldridge J M. 2007. Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. Journal of Econometrics 141(2): 1281–301.

Wooldridge J M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.

Wossen T, T Abdoulaye, A Alene, G M Haile, S Feleke, A Olanrewaju and V Manyong. 2017. Impact of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare. Journal of Rural Studies 54: 223–33.